Search and Validation of Acidity References in Sensory Evaluation of Pepper

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 384-391

  Torre, Paloma ^a   Arana, Inés ^a   Ortigosa, María ^a   Ibáñez, Francisco C ^a  

^a PUBLIC UNIVERSITY OF NAVARRE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROL PROCEDURES; INTERLABORATORY TESTS; PROTECTED DESIGNATION OF ORIGINS; SENSORY EVALUATION; SENSORY PANELS; SENSORY QUALITIES; TECHNICAL COMPETENCE; VEGETABLE FOOD;

ACCREDITATION; QUALITY CONTROL;

QUALITY ASSURANCE;

CAPSICUM;

EID: 84867213175     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: 1745459X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/joss.12003     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Baldwin, E.A., Goodner, K. and Plotto, A. 2008. Interaction of volatiles, sugars, and acids on perception of tomato aroma and flavor descriptors. J. Food Sci. 73, 294-307.
2. Bett-Garber, K.L., Lea, J.M., Champagne, E.T. and Mcclung, A.M. 2012. Whole-grain rice flavor associated with assorted bran colors. J. Sensory Studies 27, 78-86.
3. Dessirier, J.M., O'mahony, M., Iodi-Carstens, M. and Carstens, E. 2000. Sensory properties of citric acid: Psychophysical evidence for sensitization, self-desensitization, cross-desensitization and cross-stimulus-induced recovery following capsaicin. Chem. Senses 25, 769-780.
4. Diamond, J. and Lawless, H.T. 2001. Context effects and reference standards with magnitude estimation and the labeled magnitude scale. J. Sensory Studies 16, 1-10.
5. Drobna, Z., Wismer, W.V. and Goonewardene, L.A. 2004. Selection of an astringency reference standard for the sensory evaluation of black tea. J. Sensory Studies 19, 119-132.
6. Eggink, P.M., Maliepaard, C., Tikunov, Y., Haanstra, J.P.W., Bovy, A.G. and Visser, R.G.F. 2012. A taste of sweet pepper: Volatile and non-volatile chemical composition of fresh sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum) in relation to sensory evaluation of taste. Food Chem. 132, 301-310.
7. Hongsoongnern, P. and Chambers, E.I.V. 2008. A lexicon for texture and flavor characteristics of fresh and processed tomatoes. J. Sensory Studies 23, 583-599.
8. ISO. 1993. Sensory analysis - general guidance for the selection, training and monitoring of assessors - part 1: Selected assessors. ISO 8586-1.1993. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
9. ISO. 1996. General requirements for bodies operating product certification systems. ISO/IEC Guide 65.1996. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
10. ISO. 2003. Sensory analysis - guidelines for the use of quantitative response scales. ISO 4121. 2003. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
11. ISO. 2005a. General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO/IEC 17025.2005. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
12. ISO. 2005b. Sensory analysis - methodology - general guidance. ISO 6658.2005. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
13. ISO. 2007. Sensory analysis - general guidance for the design of test rooms. ISO 8589. 2007. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
14. ISO. 2008. Sensory analysis - general guidance for the selection, training and monitoring of assessors - part 2: Expert sensory assessors. ISO 8586-2.2008. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
15. Jeon, S.Y., O'mahony, M. and Kim, K.O. 2004. A comparison of category and line scales under various experimental protocols. J. Sensory Studies 19, 49-66.
16. Koppel, K. and Chambers, E.I.V. 2010. Development and application of a lexicon to describe the flavor of pomegranate juice. J. Sensory Studies 25, 819-837.
17. Koppel, K., Timberg, L., Salumets, A. and Paalme, T. 2011. Possibility for a strawberry jam sensory standard. J. Sensory Studies 26, 71-80.
18. Lawless, A. and Malone, G.J. 1986. The discriminative efficiency of common scaling methods. J. Sensory Studies 1, 85-98.
19. Lee, H.J., Kim, K.O. and O'mahony, M. 2001. Effects of forgetting on various protocols for category and line scales of intensity. J. Sensory Studies 16, 327-342.
20. Leksrisompong, P.P., Whitson, M.E., Truong, V.D. and Drake, M.A. 2012. Sensory attributes and consumer acceptance of sweet potato cultivars with varying flesh colors. J. Sensory Studies 27, 59-69.
21. Park, J.Y., Jeon, S.Y., O'mahony, M. and Kim, K.O. 2004. Induction of scaling errors. J. Sensory Studies 19, 261-271.
22. Park, J.Y., O'Mahony, M. and Kim, K.O. 2007. "Different-stimulus" scalingerrors; effects of scalelength. Food Qual. Prefer. 18, 362-368.
23. Pérez-Elortondo, F., Ojeda, M., Albisu, M., Salmerón, J., Etayo, I. and Molina, M. 2007. Food quality certification: An approach for the development of accredited sensory evaluation methods. Food Qual. Prefer. 18, 425-439.
24. Serrano, M., Zapata, P.J., Castillo, S., Guillén, F., Martínez-Romero, D. and Valero, D. 2010. Antioxidant and nutritive constituents during sweet pepper development and ripening are enhanced by nitrophenolate treatments. Food Chem. 118, 497-503.
25. Stevens, S. 1969. Sensory scales of taste intensity. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 6, 302-308.
26. Talavera-Bianchi, M., Chambers, E.I.V. and Chambers, D.H. 2010. Lexicon to describe flavor of fresh leafy vegetables. J. Sensory Studies 25, 163-183.
27. Thurgood, J.E. and Martini, S. 2010. Effects of three emulsion compositions on taste thresholds and intensity ratings of five taste compounds. J. Sensory Studies 25, 861-875.