Sensory attributes and consumer acceptance of sweet potato cultivars with varying flesh colors

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 59-69

  Leksrisompong, P P ^a   Whitson, M E ^a   Truong, V D ^a,b   Drake, M A ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLOR HOMOGENEITY; CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE; MOUTHFEEL; SENSORY ATTRIBUTES; SENSORY CHARACTERISTICS; SWEET POTATO; SWEET TASTE; VISUAL APPEARANCE; VISUAL CUES; WHITE POTATOES;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; SUGARS; TEXTURES; VISUALIZATION;

COLOR;

DAUCUS CAROTA; IPOMOEA BATATAS; PRUNUS ARMENIACA; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 84856446452     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: 1745459X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2011.00367.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. FAOSTAT. 2008. Food and Agriculture Organization Statistical Production Yearbook. 2007-2008, FAO, Rome, Italy.
2. GIUSTI, M.M. and WROLSTAD, R.E. 2003. Review: Acylated anthocyanins from edible sources and their applications in food systems. Biochem. Eng. J. 14, 217-225.
3. KANO, M., TAKAYANAGI, T., HARADA, K., MAKINO, K. and ISHIKAWA, F. 2005. Antioxidative activity of anthocyanins from purple sweet potato, Ipomoera batatas cultivar Ayamurasaki. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 69, 979-988.
4. LAWLESS, H.T. and HEYMANN, H. 1998. Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices, International Thomson Publishing, Chapman and Hall, New York, NY.
5. LEIGHTON, C.S., SCHOENFELDT, H.C. and KRUGER, R. 2010. Quantitative descriptive sensory analysis of five different cultivars of sweetpotato to determine sensory and textural profiles. J. Sensory Studies 25, 2-18.
6. McEWAN, J.A. 1996. Preference mapping for product optimixation. In Multivariate Analysis of Data in Sensory Science (T. Næs and E. Risvik, eds.) pp. 71-101, Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
7. MEILGAARD, M.C., CIVILLE, G.V. and CARR, B.T. 2007. Sensory Evaluation Techniques, 4th Ed., pp. 189-253, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
8. SUDA, I., OKI, T., MASUDA, M., KOBAYASHI, M., NISHIBA, Y. and FURUTA, S. 2003. Physiological functionality of purple-fleshed sweetpotatoes containing anthocyanins and their utilization in foods. Jpn. Agric. Res. Q. 37, 167-173.
9. TOMLINS, K., RWIZA, E., NYANGO, A., AMOUR, R., NGENDELLO, T., KAPINGA, R., REES, D. and JOLLIFFE, F. 2004. The use of sensory evaluation and consumer preference for the selection of sweetpotato cultivars in East Africa. J. Sci. Food Agric. 84, 791-799.
10. TRUONG, V.D. and AVULA, R.Y. 2010. Sweet potato purees and powders for functional food ingredients. In Sweet Potato: Post Harvest Aspects in Food (R.C. Ray and K.I. Tomlins, eds.) pp. 117-161, Nova Science Publishers, Inc, New York, NY.
11. TRUONG, V.D. and WALTER, W.M., JR 1994. Physical and sensory properties of sweetpotato puree texturized with cellulose derivatives. J. Food Sci. 59, 1175-1180.
12. TRUONG, V.D., WALTER, W.M., JR and HAMANN, D.D. 1997. Relationship between instrumental and sensory parameters of cooked sweetpotato texture. J. Texture Studies 28, 163-185.
13. TRUONG, V.D., AVULA, R.Y., PECOTA, K. and YENCHO, C.G. 2011. Sweetpotatoes. In Handbook of Vegetables and Vegetable Processing (N.K. Sinha, ed.) pp. 717-737, Wiley-Blackwell, Ames, IA.
14. WALTER, W.M., JR 1987. Effect of curing on sensory properties and carbohydrate composition of baked sweetpotatoes. J. Food Sci. 52, 1026-1029.