Impact of Polymers on Texture Properties of Cosmetic Emulsions: A Methodological Approach

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 392-402

  Gilbert, Laura ^a   Picard, Celine ^a   Savary, Geraldine ^a   Grisel, Michel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU HAVRE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPRESSION FORCE; COSMETIC CREAMS; DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS; FRAME OF REFERENCE; HYDROPHILIC POLYMERS; HYDROXYPROPYL GUARS; METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH; O/W EMULSIONS; OIL-IN-WATER EMULSIONS; SENSORY PANELS; SYNTHETIC POLYMERS; TEXTURE PROPERTIES; TEXTURING AGENTS;

EMULSIFICATION; EMULSIONS; NATURAL POLYMERS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; TEXTURES;

POLYMERS;

CERATONIA SILIQUA; CYAMOPSIS TETRAGONOLOBA;

EID: 84867199676     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: 1745459X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/joss.12001     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ASTM Standard E1490. 1992, 1997. Standard Practice for Descriptive Skinfeel Analysis of Creams and Lotions. ASTM International, ed. West Conshohocken, PA.
2. Carey, J.M., Moran, B., Shuster, F. and Vondruska, B. 2008. A new formulator's tool for customizing sensory properties. Cosmet. Toiletries 123, 57-66.
3. Civille, G.V. and Dus, C.A. 1991. Evaluating tactile properties of skincare products: A descriptive analysis technique. Cosmet. Toiletries 106, 83-88.
4. Close, J.-A. 1994. Men's skin care. Cosmet. Toiletries 109, 61-65.
5. Couronne, T. 1997. A study of assessors' performance using graphical methods. Food Qual. Prefer. 8, 359-365.
6. Dooley, L.M., Adhikari, K. and Chambers, E., IV. 2009. A general lexicon for sensory analysis of texture and appearance of lip products. J. Sensory Studies 24, 581-600.
7. Goldemberg, R.L. and De La Rosa, C.P. 1971. Correlation of skin feel emollients to their chemical structure. J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 22, 635-654.
8. Landa, P., Lam, F., Rothman, R., Howard, D. and Gestmann, A. 2004. Glycerin and hydroxyethyl urea: Comparing two skin moisturizers. Cosmet. Toiletries 119, 79-88.
9. Lee, I.-S., Yang, H.-M., Kim, J.-W., Maeng, Y.-J., Lee, C.-W., Kang, Y.-S., Rang, M.-J. and Kim, H.-Y. 2005. Terminology development and panel training for sensory evaluation of skin care products including aqua cream. J. Sensory Studies 20, 421-433.
10. Loden, M., Olsson, H., Skare, L. and Axell, T. 1992. Instrumental and sensory evaluation of the frictional response of the skin following a single application of five moisturizing creams. J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 43, 13-20.
11. Meilgaard, M., Civille, G.V. and Carr, B.T. 2006. Sensory Evaluation Techniques, 4th Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
12. Moravkova, T. and Stern, P. 2011. Rheological and textural properties of cosmetic emulsions. Appl. Rheol. 21(3), 35200, 1-6.
13. Muñoz, A.M. and Civille, G.V. 1992. The spectrum descriptive analysis method. In Manual on Descriptive Analysis Testing for Sensory Evaluation, ( R.C. Hootman, ed.) pp. 22-33, ASTM press, Philadelphia, PA.
14. Muñoz, A.M. and Civille, G.V. 1998. Universal, product and attribute specific scaling and the development of common lexicons in descriptive analysis. J. Sensory Studies 13, 57-75.
15. Parente, M.E., Gambaro, A. and Ares, G. 2008. Sensory characterization of emollients. J. Sensory Studies 23, 149-161.
16. Parente, M.E., Ares, G. and Manzoni, A.V. 2010. Application of two consumer profiling techniques to cosmetic emulsions. J. Sensory Studies 25, 685-705.
17. Parente, M.E., Gambaro, A. and Solana, G. 2005. Study of sensory properties of emollients used in cosmetics and their correlation with physicochemical properties. J. Cosmet. Sci. 56, 175-182.
18. Parente, M.E., Manzoni, A.V. and Ares, G. 2011. External preference mapping of commercial antiaging creams based on consumers' responses to a check-all-that-apply question. J. Sensory Studies 26, 158-166.
19. Rawling, A.V. 2006. Ethnic skin types: Are there differences in skin structure and function? Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 28, 79-93.
20. Salka, B.A. 1997. Choosing emollients. Cosmet. Toiletries 112, 101-106.
21. Schwartz, N.O. 1975. Adaptation of the sensory texture profile method to skin care products. J. Texture Studies 6, 33-42.
22. Stone, H. and Sidel, J.L. 1985. Sensory Evaluation Practices, Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
23. Stone, H., Sidel, J., Oliver, S., Woolsey, A. and Singleton, R.C. 1974. Sensory evaluation by quantitative descriptive analysis. Food Technol. 28, 24-34.
24. Szczesniak, A.S. 1963. Classification of textural characteristics. J. Food Sci. 28, 385-389.
25. Wiechers, J.W. 1999. Comparing instrumental and sensory measurements of skin moisturization. Cosmet. Toiletries 114, 29-34.
26. Wiechers, J.W. and Wortel, V.A.L. 2000. Making sense of sensory data. Cosmet. Toiletries 115, 37-45.
27. Wortel, V.A.L. and Wiechers, J.W. 2000. Skin sensory performance of individual personal care ingredients and marketed personal care products. Food Qual. Prefer. 11, 121-127.