Structured learning from partial annotations

Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2012

Volumn 2, Issue , 2012, Pages 1519-1526

  Lou, Xinghua ^a   Hamprecht, Fred A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCAVE-CONVEX PROCEDURE; EMPIRICAL COMPARISON; GROUND TRUTH; OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; STRUCTURED LEARNING; TRAINING SETS; VARIABLE NUMBER;

BENCHMARKING; FORESTRY; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

TREES (MATHEMATICS);

FORESTRY; MATHEMATICS; TREES;

EID: 84867130315     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Altun, Y., McAllester, D., and Belkin, M. Maximum margin semi-supervised learning for structured variables. In NIPS, 2006.
2. Bakir, G., Hofmann, T., Schoelkopf, B., Smola, A. J., Taskar, B., and Vishwanathan, S.V.N. Predicting Structured Data. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006.
3. Cour, T., Sapp, B., and Taskar, B. Learning from Partial Labels. JMLR, 12:1225-1261, 2011.
4. Do, C. B., Le, Q., Teo, C. H., Chapelle, O., and Smola, A. Tighter bounds for structured estimation. In NIPS, 2008.
5. Fernandes, E. and Brefeld, U. Learning from partially annotated sequences. In ECML/PKDD, 2011.
6. Girshick, R. B., Felzenszwalb, P. F., and McAllester, D. Object Detection with Grammar Models. In NIPS, 2011.
7. Jie, L. and Orabona, F. Learning from Candidate Labeling Sets. In NIPS, 2010.
8. Jin, R. and Ghahramani, Z. Learning with Multiple Labels. In NIPS, 2002.
9. Kiwiel, K. C. Proximity control in bundle methods for convex nondifferentiable minimization. Math Program, 46(1):105-122, 1990.
10. Lee, C. H., Wang, S., Jiao, F., Schuurmans, D., and Greiner, R. Learning to model spatial dependency: Semi-supervised discriminative random fields. In NIPS, 2006.
11. Lou, X. and Hamprecht, F. A. Structured learning for cell tracking. In NIPS, 2011.
12. McAllester, D. and Keshet, J. Generalization Bounds and Consistency for Latent Structural Probit and Ramp Loss. In NIPS, 2011.
13. McAllester, David, Hazan, Tamir, and Keshet, Joseph. Direct loss minimization for structured prediction. In NIPS, 2010.
14. Sontag, D., Meshi, O., Jaakkola, T. S., and Globerson, A. More data means less inference: A pseudo-max approach to structured learning. In NIPS, 2010.
15. Teo, C. H., Vishwanthan, S. V. N., Smola, A. J., and Le, Q. V. Bundle methods for regularized risk minimization. JMLR, 11:311-365, 2010.
16. Tsochantaridis, I., Joachims, T., Hofmann, T., and Altun, Y. Large Margin Methods for Structured and Interdependent Output Variables. JMLR, 6(2):1453, 2006.
17. Vedaldi, A. and Zisserman, A. Structured output regression for detection with partial truncation. In NIPS, 2009.
18. Wang, Y. and Mori, G. A discriminative latent model of object classes and attributes. In ECCV, 2010.
19. Xu, L., Wilkinson, D., Southey, F., and Schuurmans, D. Discriminative unsupervised learning of structured predictors. In ICML, 2006.
20. Yu, C. N. J. and Joachims, T. Learning Structural SVMs with Latent Variables. In ICML, 2009.
21. Yuille, A. L. and Rangarajan, A. The Concave-Convex Procedure. Neural Comput, 15(4):915-936, 2003.
22. Zhang, T. Statistical Analysis of Some Multi-category Large Margin Classification Methods. JMLR, 5:1225-1251, 2004.
23. Zhu, L. L., Chen, Y., Yuille, A., and Freeman, W. Latent hierarchical structural learning for object detection. In CVPR, 2010.
24. Zien, A., Brefeld, U., and Scheffer, T. Transductive support vector machines for structured variables. In ICML, 2007.