The role of competitive inhibition and top-down feedback in binding during object recognition

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 3, Issue JUN, 2012, Pages

  Wyatte, Dean ^a   Herd, Seth ^a   Mingus, Brian ^a   O'Reilly, Randall ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Binding; Competitive inhibition; Computational model; Feedback; Object recognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867129274     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00182     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Bar, M., Kassam, K., Ghuman, A., Boshyan, J., and Schmidt, A. (2006). Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 449-454.
2. Beck, D. M., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., and Lavie, N. (2001). Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 645-650.
3. Boehler, C. N., Schoenfeld, M. A., Heinze, H. J., and Hopf, J. M. (2008). Rapid recurrent processing gates awareness in primary visual cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 8742-8747.
4. Bressler, S. L., Tang, W., Sylvester, C. M., Shulman, G. L., and Corbetta, M. (2008). Top-down control of human visual cortex by frontal and parietal cortex in anticipatory visual spatial attention. J. Neurosci. 28, 10056-10061.
5. Brincat, S. L., and Connor, C. E. (2006). Dynamic shape synthesis in posterior inferotemporal cortex. Neuron 49, 17-24.
6. Bundesen, C., Habekost, T., and Kyllingsbaek, S. (2005). A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology. Psy-chol. Rev. 112, 291-328.
7. Buzsaki, G., and Draguhn, A. (2004). Neuroscience neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. Science 304, 1926-1938.
8. Carandini, M., and Heeger, D. (2012). Normalization as a canonical neural computation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 51-62.
9. Delorme, A., and Thorpe, S. (2001). Face identification using one spike per neuron: resistance to image degradations. Neural. Netw. 14, 795-803.
10. Desimone, R., and Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 193-222.
11. Fahrenfort, J. J., Scholte, H. S., and Lamme, V. A. F. (2007). Masking disrupts reentrant processing in human visual cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19, 1488-1497.
12. Felleman, D. J., and van Essen, D. C. (1991). Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 1, 1-47.
13. Gray, C. M., König, P., Engel, A. K., and Singer, W. (1989). Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties. Nature 338, 334-337.
14. Hegde, J., and van Essen, D. C. (2004). Temporal dynamics of shape analysis in macaque visual area v2. J. Neurophysiol. 92, 3030-3042.
15. Hegde, J., and van Essen, D. C. (2006). Temporal dynamics of 2d and 3d shape representation in macaque visual area v4. Vis. Neurosci. 23, 749-763.
16. Herd, S. A., Banich, M. T., and O'Reilly, R. C. (2006). Neural mechanisms of cognitive control: an integrative model of Stroop task performance and fMRI data. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18, 22-32.
17. Johnson, J. S., and Olshausen, B. A. (2005). The recognition of partially visible natural objects in the presence and absence of their occluders. Vision Res. 45, 3262-3276.
18. Juan, C., Tiangang, Z., Hua, Y., and Fang, F. (2010). Cortical dynamics underlying face completion in human visual system. J. Neurosci. 30, 16692-16698.
19. Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., and Jessell, T. M. (1995). Essentials of Neural Science and Behavior. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.
20. Kobatake, E., and Tanaka, K. (1994). Neuronal selectivities to complex object features in the ventral visual pathway. J. Neurophysiol. 71, 856-867.
21. Koivisto, M., Railo, H., Revonsuo, A., Vanni, S., and Salminen-Vaparanta, N. (2011). Recurrent processing in v1/v2 contributes to categorization of natural scenes. J. Neurosci. 31, 2488-2492.
22. Kourtzi, Z., and Connor, C. E. (2010). Neural representations for object perception: structure, category, and adaptive coding. Annu. Rev. Neu-rosci. 34, 45-67.
23. Kourtzi, Z., and Kanwisher, N. (2001). Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science 293, 1506-1509.
24. Kovacs, G., Vogels, R., and Orban, G. A. (1995). Selectivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons for partially occluded shapes. J. Neurosci. 15, 1984-1997.
25. Lamme, V. A. (2003). Why visual attention and awareness are different. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 7, 12-18.
26. Lerner, Y., Harel, M., and Malach, R. (2004). Rapid completion effects in human high-order visual areas. Neu-roimage 21, 516-526.
27. Lerner, Y., Harel, M., and Malach, R. (2004). Rapid completion effects in human high-order visual areas. Neu-roimage 21, 516-526.
28. Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., and Poggio, T. (1995). Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Curr. Biol. 5, 552-563.
29. Masquelier, T., and Thorpe, S. J. (2007). Unsupervised learning of visual features through spike timing dependent plasticity. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3, e31. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030031
30. Maunsell, J. H. R., and Treue, S. (2006). Feature-based attention in visual cortex. Trends Neurosci. 29, 317-322.
31. Miller, E. K., and Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function.Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 167-202.
32. Mountcastle, V. B. (1997). The columnar organization of the neocortex. Brain 120(Pt 4), 701-722.
33. Nielsen, K. J., Logothetis, N. K., and Rainer, G. (2006). Dissociation between local field potentials and spiking activity in macaque inferior temporal cortex reveals diagnosticity-based encoding of complex objects. J. Neurosci. 26, 9639-9645.
34. O'Reilly, R. C. (1996). Biologically plausible error-driven learning using local activation differences: the generalized recirculation algorithm. Neural Comput. 8, 895-938.
35. O'Reilly, R. C., Busby, R. S., and Soto, R. (2003)."Three forms of binding and their neural substrates: alternatives to temporal synchrony,"in The Unity of Consciousness: Binding, Integra-tion, and Dissociation, ed. A. Cleeremans (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 168-192.
36. O'Reilly, R. C., Herd, S. A., and Pauli, W. M. (2010). Computational models of cognitive control. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 20, 257-261
37. O'Reilly, R. C., and Munakata, Y. (2000). Computational Explorations in Cog-nitive Neuroscience: Understanding the Mind by Simulating the Brain. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
38. Raffone, A., and Wolters, G. (2001). A cortical mechanism for binding in visual working memory. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 13, 766-785.
39. Reynolds, J. H., and Chelazzi, L. (2004). Attentional modulation of visual processing. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 611-647.
40. Reynolds, J. H., and Desimone, R. (1999). The role of neural mechanisms of attention in solving the binding problem. Neuron 24, 111-125.
41. Riesenhuber, M., and Poggio, T. (1999a). Are cortical models really bound by the "binding problem?" Neuron 24, 87-93.
42. Riesenhuber, M., and Poggio, T. (1999b). Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 1199-1204
43. Riesenhuber, M., and Poggio, T. (2002). Neural mechanisms of object recognition. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 12, 162-168.
44. Roland, P. (2010). Six principles of visual cortical dynamics. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 4:28. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2010.00028
45. Rolls, E. T., and Stringer, S. M. (2006). Invariant visual object recognition: a model, with lighting invariance. J. Physiol. Paris 100, 43-62.
46. Rust, N. C., and Dicarlo, J. J. (2010). Selectivity and tolerance ("invariance") both increase as visual information propagates from cortical area v4 to it. J. Neurosci. 30, 12978-12995.
47. Scannell, J., Blakemore, C., and Young, M. P. (1995). Analysis of connectivity in the cat cerebral cortex. J. Neurosci. 15, 1463-1483.
48. Serre, T., Kreiman, G., Kouh, M., Cadieu, C., Knoblich, U., and Poggio, T. (2007). A quantitative theory of immediate visual recognition. Prog. Brain Res. 165, 33-56.
49. Shadlen, M. N., and Movshon, J. A. (1999). Synchrony unbound: a critical evaluation of the temporal binding hypothesis. Neuron 24, 67-77.
50. Simons, D. J., and Rensink, R. A. (2005). Change blindness: past, present, and future. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 9, 16-20.
51. Singer, W. (1993). Synchronization of cortical activity and its putative role in information processing and learning. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 55, 349-374.
52. Singer, W. (1999). Neuronal synchrony: a versatile code for the definition of relations? Neuron 24, 49-65.
53. Singer, W., and Gray, C. M. (1995). Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 555-586
54. Sporns, O., Honey, C. J., and Kotter, R. (2007). Identification and classification of hubs in brain networks. PLoS ONE 2, e1049. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001049
55. Sporns, O., and Zwi, J. D. (2004). The small world of the cerebral cortex. Neuroinformatics 2, 145-162.
56. Sugase-Miyamoto, Y., Matsumoto, N., and Kawano, K. (2011). Role of temporal processing stages by inferior temporal neurons in facial recognition. Front. Psychol. 2:141. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00141
57. Swadlow, H., and Gusev, A. (2002). Receptive-field construction in cortical inhibitory interneurons. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 403-404.
58. Tamura, H., and Tanaka, K. (2001). Visual response properties of cells in the ventral and dorsal parts of the macaque inferotemporal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 11, 384-399.
59. Tanaka, K. (1996). Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 19, 109-139.
60. Thompson, K. G., Biscoe, K.L., and Sato, T. R. (2005). Neuronal basis of covert spatial attention in the frontal eye field. J. Neurosci. 25, 9479-9487.
61. Tompa, T., and Sary, G. (2010). A review on the inferior temporal cortex of the macaque. Brain Res. Rev. 62, 165-182.
62. Treisman, A. (1996). The binding problem. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 6, 171-178.
63. Treisman, A. (1999). Solutions to the binding problem: progress through controversy and convergence. Neu-ron 24, 105-125.
64. Uhlhaas, P. J., Pipa, G., Lima, B., Melloni, L., Neuenschwander, S., Nikolic, D., and Singer, W. (2009). Neural synchrony in cortical networks: history concept and current status. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 3:17. doi:10.3389/neuro.07.017.2009
65. Ungerleider, L. G., and Bell, A. H. (2011). Uncovering the visual "alphabet": advances in our understanding of object perception. Vision Res. 51, 782-799.
66. Vanrullen, R. (2007). The power of the feed-forward sweep. Adv. Cogn. Psychol. 3, 167-176.
67. Vanrullen, R.(2009). Bindinghardwired vs.on-demandfeatureconjunctions. Vis. Cogn. 17, 103-119.