Comparison between radial and femoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients aged 80 years or older

Journal of Interventional Cardiology

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 513-517

  Hu, Fenghuan ^a   Yang, Yuejin ^a   Qiao, Shubin ^a   Xu, Bo ^a   Liu, Haibo ^a   Wu, Yongjian ^a   Chen, Jue ^a   You, Shijie ^a   Chen, Jilin ^a   Gao, Runlin ^a  

^a FUWAI HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CANNULATION; CARDIOVASCULAR PROCEDURE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; FEMALE; FEMORAL APPROACH; HEART DEATH; HEART INFARCTION; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOBILIZATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIAL APPROACH; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VASCULAR ACCESS; VASCULAR DISEASE;

AGE FACTORS; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; PATIENT CARE; RADIAL ARTERY; SAFETY; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84867099195     PISSN: 08964327     EISSN: 15408183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2012.00732.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W, et al,. A report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2006; 113: e85-e151.
2. Graham MM, Ghali WA, Faris PD, et al,. Survival after coronary revascularization in the elderly. Circulation 2002; 105: 2378-2384.
3. TIME Investigators. Trial of invasive versus medical therapy in elderly patients with chronic symptomatic coronary artery disease (TIME): A randomised trial. Lancet 2001; 358: 951-957.
4. Pfisterer M,. Long-term outcome in elderly patients with chronic angina managed invasively versus by optimized medical therapy: Four-year follow-up of the randomized Trial of Invasive versus Medical therapy in Elderly patients (TIME). Circulation 2004; 110: 1213-1218.
5. Bathelor WB, Anstom KJ, Muhlbaier LH,. et al. Contemporary outcome trends in elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: Results in 7472 octogenarians. National Cardiovascular Network Collaboration. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 723-730.
6. Klein LW, Block P, Brindis RG, et al,. Percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians in the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry: Development of a nomogram predictive of in hospital mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 394-402.
7. Assali AR, Moustapha A, Sdringola S, et al,. The dilemma of success: Percutaneous coronary interventions in patients ≥75 years of age-successful but associated with higher vascular complications and cardiac mortality. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003; 59: 195-199.
8. Kjemeneij F, Laaman GJ, Odekerken -, et al,. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: The access study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 1269-1275.
9. Choussat R, Black A, Bossi I, et al,. Vascular complications and clinical outcome after coronary angioplasty with platelet IIb/IIIa receptor blockade. Comparison of transradial vs. transfemoral artery access. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 662-667.
10. Shibata Y, Doi O, Goto T, et al,. New guiding catheter for trans-radial percutaneous coronary angoplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998; 43: 344-351.
11. Yang CH, Guo BF, Yip HK, et al,. Bilateral cardiac catheterization: The safety and feeasibility of a superficial forearm venous and transradial arterial approach. Int Heart J 2006; 47: 21-27.
12. Wu CJ, Hung Wc, Chen SM, et al,. Feasibility and safety of transradial artery approach for selective cerebaal angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2005; 66: 21-26.
13. Valsecchi O, Vassileva A, Musumeci G, et al,. Failure of trans-radial approach during coronary interventions: Anatomic considerations. Cather Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 67 (6): 870-878.
14. Amoroso G, Laarman GJ, Kiemeneij F, et al,. Overview of the transradial approach in percutaneous coronary intervention. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2007; 8 (4): 230-237.
15. Ziakas A, Klinke P, Mildenberger R, et al,. Safety of same day discharge radial PCI in patients under and over 75 years of age. Int Heart J 2007; 48 (5): 569-578.
16. Daham JB, Ven Buuren F,. Transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: Indication, success rates clinical outcome. Indian Heart J 2010; 62 (3): 218-220.
17. Jaffe R, Hong T, Sharieff W, et al,. A comparison of radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 69: 815-820.
18. Lawton JS, Barner HB, Bailey MS, et al,. Radial artery grafts in women: Utilization and results. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80: 559-563.
19. Fukuda N, Iwahara S, Harada A, et al,. Vasospasms of the radial artery after the transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. Jpn Heart J 2004; 45: 723-731.
20. Gwon HC, Doh JH, Choi JH, et al,. A 5Fr catheter approach reduces patient discomfort during transradial coronary intervention compared with a 6Fr approach: A prospective randomized study. J Interv Cardiol 2006; 19: 141-147.