Comparison of radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 69, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 815-820

  Jaffe, Ronen ^a   Hong, Tony ^a   Sharieff, Waseem ^b   Chisholm, Robert J ^a   Kutryk, Michael J B ^a   Charron, Thierry ^a   Cheema, Asim N ^a  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Angioplasty; Elderly; Vascular complications

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; ANTICOAGULANT AGENT; FIBRINOGEN RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT HEPARIN;

AGED; ANGINA PECTORIS; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CANNULATION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; FLUOROSCOPY; GERIATRIC PATIENT; HEMATOMA; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY FAILURE; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; OCTOGENARIAN; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RADIAL ARTERY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; STROKE; THROMBOSIS; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR ACCESS;

AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; COHORT STUDIES; CONTRAST MEDIA; EARLY AMBULATION; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; FLUOROSCOPY; HEMATOMA; HEMORRHAGE; HUMANS; KIDNEY DISEASES; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; ODDS RATIO; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIAL ARTERY; REGISTRIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34249897540     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21021     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W, Howard VJ, Rumsfeld J, Manolio T, Zheng ZJ, Flegal K, O'Donnell C, Kittner S, Lloyd-Jones D, Goff DC Jr, Hong Y, Adams R, Friday G, Furie K, Gorelick P, Kissela B, Marler J, Meigs J, Roger V, Sidney S, Sorlie P, Steinberger J, Wasserthiel-Smoller S, Wilson M, Wolf P. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2006 update: A report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2006;113:e85-e151.
2. Graham MM, Ghali WA, Faris PD, Galbraith PD, Norris CM, Knudtson ML. Survival after coronary revascularization in the elderly. Circulation 2002;105:2378-2384.
3. TIME Investigators. Trial of invasive versus medical therapy in elderly patients with chronic symptomatic coronary-artery disease (TIME): A randomised trial. Lancet 2001;358:951-957.
4. Pfisterer M. Long-term outcome in elderly patients with chronic angina managed invasively versus by optimized medical therapy: Four-year follow-up of the randomized Trial of Invasive versus Medical therapy in Elderly patients (TIME). Circulation 2004;110:1213-1218.
5. Batchelor WB, Anstrom KJ, Muhlbaier LH, Grosswald R, Weintraub WS, O'Neill WW, Peterson ED. Contemporary outcome trends in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: Results in 7,472 octogenarians. National Cardiovascular Network Collaboration. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:723-730.
6. Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Abizaid A, Saucedo JF, Mehran R, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Satler LF, Leon MB. Influence of patient age on acute and late clinical outcomes following Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent implantation. Am J Cardiol 2000;85:338-343.
7. Chauhan MS, Kuntz RE, Ho KL, Cohen DJ, Popma JJ, Carrozza JP Jr, Baim DS, Cutlip DE. Coronary artery stenting in the aged. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:856-862.
8. Piper WD, Malenka DJ, Ryan TJ Jr, Shubrooks SJ Jr, O'Connor GT, Robb JF, Farrell KL, Corliss MS, Hearne MJ, Kellett MA Jr, Watkins MW, Bradley WA, Hettleman BD, Silver TM, McGrath PD, O'Mears JR, Wennberg DE. Predicting vascular complications in percutaneous coronary interventions. Am Heart J 2003;145:1022-1029.
9. Kobayashi Y, Mehran R, Mintz GS, Dangas G, Moussa I, Lansky AJ, Stone GW, Moses JW, Leon MB. Comparison of in-hospital and one-year outcomes after multiple coronary arterial stenting in patients ≥80 years old versus those <80 years old. Am J Cardiol 2003;92:443-446.
10. Klein LW, Block P, Brindis RG, McKay CR, McCallister BD, Wolk M, Weintraub W. Percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians in the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry: Development of a nomogram predictive of in-hospital mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:394-402.
11. Assali AR, Moustapha A, Sdringola S, Salloum J, Awadalla H, Saikia S, Ghani M, Hale S, Schroth G, Rosales O, Anderson HV, Smalling RW. The dilemma of success: Percutaneous coronary interventions in patients ≥75 years of age-successful but associated with higher vascular complications and cardiac mortality. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;59:195-199.
12. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: The access study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:1269-1275.
13. Rao AK, Pratt C, Berke A, Jaffa A, Ockene I, Schreiber TL, Bell WR, Knatterud G, Robertson TL, Terrin ML. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial - Phase I: Hemorrhagic manifestations and changes in plasma fibrinogen and the fibrinolytic system in patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and streptokinase. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;11:1-11.
14. Choussat R, Black A, Bossi I, Fajadet J, Marco J. Vascular complications and clinical outcome after coronary angioplasty with platelet IIb/IIIa receptor blockade. Comparison of transradial vs transfemoral arterial access. Eur Heart J 2000;21:662-667.
15. Klinke WP, Hilton JD, Warburton RN, Warburton WP, Tan RP. Comparison of treatment outcomes in patients ≥80 years undergoing transradial versus transfemoral coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2004;93:1282-1285.
16. Louvard Y, Benamer H, Garot P, Hildick-Smith D, Loubeyre C, Rigattieri S, Monchi M, Lefevre T, Hamon M. Comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary angiography and angioplasty in octogenarians (the OCTOPLUS study). Am J Cardiol 2004;94:1177-1180.
17. Lawton JS, Barner HB, Bailey MS, Guthrie TJ, Moazami N, Pasque MK, Moon MR, Damiano RJ Jr. Radial artery grafts in women: Utilization and results. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:559-563.
18. Fukuda N, Iwahara S, Harada A, Yokoyama S, Akutsu K, Takano M, Kobayashi A, Kurokawa S, Izumi T. Vasospasms of the radial artery after the transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. Jpn Heart J 2004;45:723-731.
19. Gwon HC, Doh JH, Choi JH, Lee SH, Hong KP, Park JE, Seo JD. A 5Fr catheter approach reduces patient discomfort during transradial coronary intervention compared with a 6Fr approach: A prospective randomized study. J Interv Cardiol 2006;19:141-147.
20. Ikari Y, Nagaoka M, Kim JY, Morino Y, Tanabe T. The physics of guiding catheters for the left coronary artery in transfemoral and transradial interventions. J Invasive Cardiol 2005;17:636-641.
21. Dana A, Barbeau GR. The use of multiple "buddies" during transradial angioplasty in a complex calcified coronary tree. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006;67:396-399.
22. Kawashima O, Endoh N, Terashima M, Ito Y, Abe S, Ootomo T, Ogata K, Honda H, Takizawa K, Miyazaki Y, Sugawara D, Komatsu M, Sawazi Y, Ozaki T, Uchimuro T, Meguro T, Isoyama S. Effectiveness of right or left radial approach for coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;61:333-337.