Prosthetic valves in adult patients with congenital heart disease: Rationale and design of the Dutch PROSTAVA study

Netherlands Heart Journal

Volumn 20, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 419-424

  Freling, H G ^a,g   van Slooten, Y J ^a,g   van Melle, J P ^a   Mulder, B J M ^b   van Dijk, A P J ^c   Hillege, H L ^a   Post, M C ^d   Sieswerda, G T ^e   Jongbloed, M R M ^f   Willems, T P ^a   Pieper, P G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d ST ANTONIUS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^f LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^g ROYAL NETHERLANDS ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Congenital heart disease; Functional outcome; Prosthesis patient mismatch; Prosthetic heart valve; Quality of life; Valvular heart disease

Indexed keywords

AMINO TERMINAL PRO BRAIN NATRIURETIC PEPTIDE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CARDIOPULMONARY EXERCISE TEST; CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART MUSCLE OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; HEART RHYTHM; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL HISTORY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREVALENCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SHORT FORM 36; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84867082490     PISSN: 15685888     EISSN: 18766250     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12471-012-0308-4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Marelli AJ, Mackie AS, Ionescu-Ittu R, et al. Congenital heart disease in the general population: changing prevalence and age distribution. Circulation. 2007;115:163-72.
2. Drenthen W, Boersma E, Balci A, et al. Predictors of pregnancy complications in women with congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:2124-32.
3. Rahimtoola SH. Choice of prosthetic heart valve in adults an update. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2413-26.
4. Tasca G, Mhagna Z, Perotti S, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on cardiac events and midterm mortality after aortic valve replacement in patients with pure aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2006;113:570-6.
5. Karamlou T, Jang K, Williams WG, et al. Outcomes and associated risk factors for aortic valve replacement in 160 children: a competing-risks analysis. Circulation. 2005;112:3462-9.
6. Masuda M, Kado H, Ando Y, et al. Intermediate-term results after the aortic valve replacement using bileaflet mechanical prosthetic valve in children. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;34:42-7.
7. Oosterhof T, Meijboom FJ, Vliegen HW, et al. Long-term followup of homograft function after pulmonary valve replacement in patients with tetralogy of Fallot. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1478-84.
8. Akins CW, Miller DC, Turina MI, et al. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:732-8.
9. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1131-41.
10. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Prosthesis-patient mismatch in the mitral position: old concept, new evidences. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:1405-8.
11. Loup O, von Weissenfluh C, Gahl B, et al. Quality of life of grown-up congenital heart disease patients after congenital cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;36:105-11.
12. Moons P, Van Deyk K, De Geest S, et al. Is the severity of congenital heart disease associated with the quality of life and perceived health of adult patients? Heart. 2005;91:1193-8.
13. Pieper PG, Balci A, Van Dijk AP. Pregnancy in women with prosthetic heart valves. Neth Heart J. 2008;16:406-11.
14. Pieper PG. Expected and unexpected cardiac problems during pregnancy. Neth Heart J. 2008;16:403-5.
15. Masuda M, Kado H, Tatewaki H, et al. Late results after mitral valve replacement with bileaflet mechanical prosthesis in children: evaluation of prosthesis-patient mismatch. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:913-7.
16. Tasca G, Brunelli F, Cirillo M, et al. Impact of valve prosthesispatient mismatch on left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:505-10.
17. Waterbolk TW, Hoendermis ES, den Hamer IJ, et al. Pulmonary valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis. Promising results of 28 procedures in patients with congenital heart disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;30:28-32.
18. Stulak JM, Dearani JA, Burkhart HM, et al. The increasing use of mechanical pulmonary valve replacement over a 40-year period. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:2009-15.