Bioavailability of methionine hydroxy analog-calcium salt relative to dl-methionine to support nitrogen retention and growth in starter pigs

Animal

Volumn 6, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1750-1756

  Opapeju, F O ^a   Htoo, J K ^b   Dapoza, C ^c   Nyachoti, C M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b EVONIK INDUSTRIES AG   (Germany)

^c Evonik Degussa International AG   (Spain)

Author keywords

biological efficacy; dl methionine; methionine hydroxy analog calcium salt; N balance; pigs

Indexed keywords

2 HYDROXY 4 METHYLTHIOBUTYRIC ACID; ALPHA-HYDROXY-GAMMA-METHYLMERCAPTOBUTYRIC ACID; DRUG DERIVATIVE; METHIONINE; NITROGEN;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; BIOAVAILABILITY; DIET; DIET SUPPLEMENTATION; FEMALE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MALE; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SWINE; URINE;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL AVAILABILITY; DIET; DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS; FEMALE; MALE; METHIONINE; NITROGEN; SWINE;

PIERIS BRASSICAE; SUIDAE; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84867079333     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731112000869     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Baker DH 1994. Utilization of precursors for L-amino acids. In Amino acids in farm animal nutrition (ed. JPF D'Mello), pp. 37-64. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
2. Boebel KP and Baker DH 1982. Efficacy of the calcium salt and free acid forms of methionine hydroxy analog for chicks. Poultry Science 61, 1167-1175.
3. Brown JA and Cline TR 1974. Urea excretion in pig: an indicator of protein quality and amino acid requirements. Journal of Nutrition 104, 542-545.
4. Christensen AC, Anderson JO and Dobson DC 1980. Factors affecting efficacy of methionine hydroxy analog for chicks fed amino acid diets. Poultry Science 59, 2480-2484.
5. Chung TK and Baker DH 1992. Utilization of methionine isomers and analogs by the pig. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 72, 185-188.
6. Commission Directive 1998. Establishing community methods for the determination of amino-acids, crude oils and fats, and olanquindox in feeding stuff and amending Directive 71/393/EEC, annex part A. Determination of amino acids. Official Journal of the European CommunitiesL257, 14-23.
7. Commission Directive 2000. Establishing community methods for the determination of vitamin A, vitamin E and tryptophan, annex part C. Determination of tryptophan. Official Journal of the European Communities L 174, 45-50.
8. Dilger RN and Baker DH 2008. Cyst(e)ine imbalance and its effect on methionine precursor utilization in chicks. Journal of Animal Science 86, 1832-1840.
9. Drew MD, van Kessel AG and Maenz DD 2003. Absorption of methionine and 2-hydroxy-4-methylthiobutanoic acid in conventional and germ-free chickens. Poultry Science 82, 1149-1153.
10. Elwert C, Fernandes ED and Lemme A 2008. Biological effectiveness of methionine hydroxy-analogue calcium salt in relation to DL-methionine in broiler chickens. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 21, 1506-1515.
11. Feng Z, Qiao S, Ma Y, Wang X, Li X and Thacker PA 2006. Efficacy of methionine hydroxyl analog and DL-methionine as methionine sources for growing pigs. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 5, 135-142.
12. Huyghebaert G 1993. Comparison of DL-methionine and methionine hydroxy analog-free acid in broilers by using multi-exponential regression models. British Poultry Science 34, 351-359.
13. Kim BG, Lindemann MD, Rademacher M, Brennan JJ and Cromwell GL 2006. Efficacy of DL-methionine hydroxy analog free acid and DL-methionine as methionine sources for pigs. Journal of Animal Science 84, 104-111.
14. Knight CD, Atwell CA, Wuelling CW, Ivey FJ and Dibner JJ 1998. The relative effectiveness of 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio) butanoic acid and DL-methionine in young swine. Journal of Animal Science 76, 781-787.
15. Lingens G and Molnar S 1996. Studies on metabolism of broilers by using 14C-labelled DL-methionine and DL-methionine hydroxyl analogue Ca-salt. Archives of Animal Nutrition 49, 113-124.
16. Littell RC, Lewis AJ and Henry PR 1995. Statistical evaluation of bioavailability assays. In Bioavailability of nutrients for animals-amino acids, minerals, and vitamins (ed. CB Ammerman, DH Baker and AJ Lewis), pp. 5-33. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, USA.
17. Littell RC, Henry PR, Lewis AJ and Ammerman CB 1997. Estimation of relative bioavailability of nutrients using SAS procedures. Journal of Animal Science 75, 2672-2683.
18. Llames CR and Fontaine J 1994. Determination of amino acids in feeds: collaborative study. Journal of Association of Official Analytical Chemists International 77, 1362-1402.
19. Malik G, Hoehler D, Rademacher M, Drew MD and Van Kessel AG 2009. Apparent absorption of methionine and 2-hydroxy-4-methylthiobutanoic acid from gastrointestinal tract of conventional and gnotobiotic pigs. Animal 3, 1378-1386.
20. National Research Council (NRC) 1998. Nutrient requirements of swine, 10th edition. NRC, Washington, DC, USA.
21. Otto ER, Yokoyama M, Ku PK, Ames NK and Trottier NL 2003. Nitrogen balance and ileal amino acid digestibility in growing pigs fed diets reduced in protein concentration. Journal of Animal Science 81, 1743-1753.
22. Payne RL, Lemme A, Seko H, Hashimoto Y, Fujisaki H, Koreleski J, Swiatkiewicz S, SzczurekWand Rostagno H 2006. Bioavailability of methionine hydroxy analoguefree acid relative to DL-methionine in broilers. Animal Science Journal 77, 427-439.
23. Rademacher M, Sauer WC and Jansman AJM 2001. Standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in pigs. Evonik Degussa, Germany.
24. Reifsnyder DH, Young CTand Jones EE 1984. The use of low protein liquid diets to determine the methionine requirement and the efficacy of methionine hydroxy analogue for the three-week old pig. Journal of Nutrition 114, 1705-1715.
25. Roemer A and Abel HJ 1999. Effects of-methionine hydroxy analogue (MHA) or-methionine (-Met) on N-retention in broiler chickens and pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 81, 193-203.
26. Scott HM, KellyMand Huston RL 1966. L-methionine versus methionine hydroxy analogue in basal diets containing either isolated soybean protein or crystalline amino acids. Poultry Science 45, 1123 (Abstract).
27. Shoveller AK, Moehn S, Rademacher M, Htoo JK and Ball RO 2010. Methioninehydroxy analogue was found to be significantly less bioavailable compared to DL-methionine for protein deposition in growing pigs. Animal 4, 61-66.
28. VDLUFA 1997. Bestimmung von DL-2-Hydroxy-4-methyl-mercaptobuttersä ure nach Hydrolyse (Gesamt MHAR), Methode 4.11.4 Methodenbuch Band III. Die chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln, 4th Supplement. VDLUFA-Verlag, Darmstadt, Germany.
29. Yi GF, Gaines AM, Ratliff BW, Srichana P, Allee GL, Perryman KR and Knight CD 2006. Estimation of the true ileal digestible lysine and sulfur amino acid requirement and comparison of the bioefficacy of 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio) butanoic acid and DL-methionine in eleven-to twenty-six-kilogram nursery pigs. Journal of Animal Science 84, 1709-1721.
30. Zimmermann B, Mosenthin R, Rademacher M, Lynch PB and Esteve-Garcia E 2005. Comparative studies on the relative efficacy of DL-methionine and liquid methionine hydroxy analogue in growing pigs. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 18, 1003-1010.