Methionine-hydroxy analogue was found to be significantly less bioavailable compared to dl-methionine for protein deposition in growing pigs

Animal

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 61-66

  Shoveller, A K ^a,c   Moehn, S ^a   Rademacher, M ^b   Htoo, J K ^b   Ball, R O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b EVONIK DEGUSSA GMBH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bioavailability; Indicator oxidation; Methionine; Methionine hydroxy analogue; Pig

Indexed keywords

SUIDAE;

EID: 76849089336     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731109990917     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ball RO and Bayley HS 1986. Influence of dietary protein concentration on the oxidation of phenylalanine by the young pig. British Journal of Nutrition 55, 651-658.
2. Batterham ES 1992. Availability and utilization of amino acids for growing pigs. Nutrition Research Reviews 5, 1-18.
3. Bertolo RF, Moehn S, Pencharz PB and Ball RO 2005. Estimate of the variability of the lysine requirement of growing pigs using the indicator amino acid oxidation technique. Journal of Animal Science 83, 2535-2542.
4. Commission Directive 1998. Establishing community methods for the determination of amino-acids, crude oils and fats, and olanquindox in feeding stuff and amending Directive 71/393/EEC, annex part A. Determination of Amino Acids. Official Journal of the European Communities L257, 14-23.
5. Commission Directive 2000. Establishing community methods for the determination of vitamin A, vitamin E and tryptophan, annex part C. Determination of Tryptophan. Official Journal of the European Communities L174, 45-50.
6. Dilger RN and Baker DH 2008. Cyst(e)ine imbalance and its effect on methionine precursor utilization in chicks. Journal of Animal Science 86, 1832-1840.
7. Drew MD, van Kessel AG and Maenz DD 2003. Absorption of methionine and 2-hydroxy-4-methylthiobutanoic acid in conventional and germ-free chickens. Poultry Science 82, 1149-1153.
8. Elango R, Ball RO and Pencharz PB 2008. Indicator amino acid oxidation: concept to application. Journal of Nutrition 138, 243-246.
9. Gaines AM, Yi GF, Ratcliff BW, Srichana P, Kendall DC, Allee GL, Knight CD and Perryman KR 2005. Estimation of true ileal digestible sulfur amino acid:lysine in 8- to 26-kg nursery pigs. Journal of Animal Science 83, 2527-2534.
10. Jansman AJM, Kan CA and Wiebenga J 2003. Comparison of the biological efficacy of DL-methionine and HMB (hydroxy-4-methylthiobutanoic acid) in pigs and poultry. CVB - documentatierapport Nr. 29, The Netherlands.
11. Kim BG, Lindemann MD, Rademacher M, Brennan JJ and Cromwell GL 2006. Efficacy of DL-methionine hydroxy analog free acid and DL-methionine as methionine sources for pigs. Journal of Animal Science 84, 104-111.
12. Knight DC, Atwell CA, Wuelling CW, Ivey FJ and Dibner JJ 1998. The relative effectiveness of 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio) butanoic acid and dl-methionine in young swine. Journal of Animal Science 76, 781-787.
13. Littell RC, Henry PR, Lewis AJ and Ammerman CB 1997. Estimation of relative bioavailability of nutrients using SAS procedures. Journal of Animal Science 75, 2672-2683.
14. Littell RC, Lewis AJ and Henry PR 1995. Statistical evaluation of bioavailability assays. In Bioavailability of nutrients for animals - amino acids, minerals, and vitamins (ed. CB Ammerman, DH Baker and AJ Lewis), pp. 5-33.
15. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, USA.
16. Llames CR and Fontaine J 1994. Determination of amino acids in feeds: collaborative study. Journal of Association of Official Analytical Chemists International 77, 1362-1402.
17. Maenz DD and Engele-Schaan CM 1996a. Methionine and 2-hydroxy-4 methylthiobutanoic acid are transported by distinct Na1- dependent and H1-dependent systems in the brush border membrane of the chick intestinal epithelium. Journal of Nutrition 126, 529-536.
18. Maenz DD and Engele-Schaan CM 1996b. Methionine and 2-hydroxy-4- methylthiobutanoic acid are partially converted to nonabsorbed compounds during passage through the small intestine and heat exposure does not affect small intestinal absorption of methionine sources in broiler chicks. Journal of Nutrition 126, 1438-1444.
19. Malik G, Hoehler D, Rademacher M, Drew MD and Van Kessel AG 2009. Apparent absorption of methionine and 2-hydroxy-4-methylthiobutanoic acid from the gastrointestinal tract of conventional and gnotobiotic pigs. Animal 3, 1378-1386.
20. Moehn S, Bertolo RFP, Pencharz PB and Ball RO 2004. Indicator amino acid oxidation responds rapidly to changes in lysine or protein intake in growing and adult pigs. Journal of Nutrition 134, 836-841.
21. Moehn S, Bertolo RFP, Pencharz PB and Ball RO 2005. Development of the indicator amino acid oxidation to determine the availability of amino acids for pigs. Journal of Nutrition 135, 2866-2870.
22. National Research Council (NRC) 1998. Nutrient requirements of swine, 10th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
23. Nufer HL 1955. Preparation of methionine analogues. United States Patent No.3 272 860. Monsanto Company, St. Louis, MO, USA.
24. Reifsnyder DH, Young CT and Jones EE 1984. The use of low protein liquid diets to determine the methionine requirement and the efficacy of methionine hydroxy analogue for the three week old pig. Journal of Nutrition 114, 1705-1715.
25. Römer A and Abel HJ 1999. Effects of -methionine hydroxyanalogue (MHA) or -methionine (-Met) on N-retention in broiler chickens and pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 81, 193-203.
26. Roth FX and Kirchgessner M 1986. Relative biological efficacy of methionine hydroxy analogue-free acid for growing pigs. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 55, 93-100.
27. Saunderson CL 1991. Metabolism of methionine and its nutritional analogs. Poultry International 30, 34-38.
28. van Weerden EJ, Schutte JB and Bertram HL 1992. Utilization of the polymers of methionine hydroxy analog free acid (MHA-FA) in broiler chicks. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 56, 63-68.
29. VDLUFA. 1997. Bestimmung von DL-2-Hydroxy-4-methyl- mercaptobuttersäure nach Hydrolyse (Gesamt MHAR), Methode 4.11.4 Methodenbuch Band III. Die chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln, 4th Supplement. VDLUFA-Verlag, Darmstadt, Germany.
30. Walz OP and Pallauf J 1996. Wirkungsvergleich von DL-Methionin und Methionin-Hydroxyanalog in Rationen mit Ackerbohnen und Erbsen bei Ferkeln und Mastschweinen. VDLUFA-Schriftenreihe 44, Kongressband, Trier, pp. 155-158 (in German).
31. Yi GF, Gaines AM, Ratliff BW, Srichana P, Allee GL, Perryman KR and Knight CD 2006. Estimation of the true ileal digestible lysine and sulfur amino acid requirement and comparison of the bioefficacy of 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)- butanoic acid and DL-methionine in eleven- to twenty-six-kilogram nursery pigs. Journal of Animal Science 84, 1709-1721.
32. Zello GA, Wykes LJ, Pencharz PB and Ball RO 1995. Recent advances in methods of assessing the dietary amino acid requirements for adult humans. Journal of Nutrition 125, 2907-2915.
33. Zimmermann B, Mosenthin R, Rademacher M, Lynch PB and Esteve-Garcia E 2005. Comparative studies on the relative efficacy of DL-methionine and liquid methionine hydroxy analogue in growing pigs. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 18, 1003-1010.