Bioavailability of methionine hydroxy analog-free acid relative to DL-methionine in broilers

Animal Science Journal

Volumn 77, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 427-439

  Payne, Robert L ^a   Lemme, Andreas ^a   Seko, Hiroaki ^b   Hashimoto, Yasushi ^c   Fujisaki, Hirokazu ^c   Koreleski, Jerzy ^d   Swiatkiewicz, Sylwester ^d   Szczurek, Witold ^d   Rostagno, Horatio ^e  

^a EVONIK INDUSTRIES AG   (Germany)

^b Degussa Japan Co Ltd   (Japan)

^c Japan Scientific Feeds Association   (Japan)

^d Experimental Station Brzezie   (Poland)

^e FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF VIÇOSA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Amino acid; Bioefficacy; Broiler; Exponential regression; Methionine sources

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746578455     PISSN: 13443941     EISSN: 17400929     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2006.00369.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). 2003. Official Methods of Analysis, 17th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA.
2. Aviagen. 2002. Ross 308 Broiler Performance Objectives. Aviagen, Huntsville, AL.
3. Cobb-Vantress. 2003. Cobb 500 Broiler Performance. Cobb-Vantress, Siloam Springs, AR.
4. de Schutte JB, Jong J. 1996. Biological efficacy of DL-methionine hydroxy analog-free acid compared to DL-methionine in broiler chicks as determined by performance and breast meat yield. Agrobiological Research 49, 74-82.
5. Drew MD, Van Kessel AG, Maenz DD. 2003. Absorption of methionine and 2-hydroxy-4-methylthiobutanoic acid in conventional and germ-free chickens. Poultry Science 82, 1149-1153.
6. Esteve-Garcia E, Austic RE. 1993. Intestinal absorption and renal excretion of dietary methionine sources by the growing chicken. Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 4, 576-587.
7. Esteve-Garcia E, Llaurado L. 1997. Performance, breast meat yield and abdominal fat deposition of male broiler chickens fed diets supplemented with DL-methionine or DL-methionine hydroxy analog free acid. British Poultry Science 38, 397-404.
8. Hoehler D, Lemme A, Marvil D, Waldroup PW. 2004. Estimation of relative effectiveness of methionine sources in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 83, 1769-1770.
9. Hoehler D, Lemme A, Roberson K, Turner K. 2005. Impact of methionine sources on performance in turkeys. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 14, 296-305.
10. Huyghebaert G. 1993. Comparison of DL-methionine and methionine hydroxy analog-free acid in broilers by using multi-exponential regression models. British Poultry Science 34, 351-359.
11. Jansman AJM, Kan CA, Wiebenga J. 2003. Comparison of the biological efficacy of DL-methionine and hydroxy-4-methyl-thiobutanoic acid (HMB) in pigs and poultry. Documentation Report No. 29. Centraal Veevoederbureau (CVB, Central Bureau for Livestock Feeding), Lelystad, The Netherlands.
12. Japan Chicken Association. 1967. Chicken Sales Standard/Chicken Dealing Standard. Japan Chicken Association, Tokyo.
13. Lemme A, Hoehler D, Brennan JJ, Mannion PF. 2002. Relative effectiveness of methionine hydroxy analog compared to DL-methionine in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 81, 838-845.
14. Lemme A, Petri A. 2003. The effectiveness of liquid methionine hydroxy analogue relative to DL-methionine - a scientific review. Amino News 4, 1-10.
15. Lewis AJ, Baker DH. 1995. Bioavailability of D-amino acids and DL-hydroxy methionine. In: Ammerman CB, Baker DH, Lewis AJ (eds), Bioavailability of Nutrients for Animals: Amino Acids, Minerals, and Vitamins, p. 67. Academic Press, New York.
16. 14C-labelled DL-methionine and DL-methionine hydroxy analog Ca-salt. Archives of Animal Nutrition 49, 113-124.
17. Littell RC, Henry PR, Lewis AJ, Ammermann CB. 1997. Estimation of relative bioavailability of nutrients using SAS procedures. Journal of Animal Science 75, 2672-2683.
18. +-dependent systems in the brush border membrane of the chick intestinal epithelium. Journal of Nutrition 126, 529-536.
19. Maenz DD, Engele-Schaan CM. 1996a. Methionine and 2-hydroxy-4- methylthiobutanoic acid are partially converted to nonabsorbed compounds during passage through the small intestine and heat exposure does not affect small intestinal absorption of methionine sources in broiler chicks. Journal of Nutrition 126, 1438-1444.
20. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan. 1997. Japanese Feeding Standard for Poultry. Japan Livestock Industry Association, Tokyo.
21. National Agricultural Research Organization. 2001. Standard Tables of Feeding Composition in Japan. Japan Livestock Industry Association, Tokyo.
22. Naumann C, Bassler R, Seibold R, Barth C. 1997. Methodenbuch Band III. VDLUFA-Verlag, Darmstadt, Germany.
23. Nufer HL. 1955. Preparation of Methionine Analogues. United States Patent No. 3 272 860. Monsanto Company, St. Louis, MO.
24. Okuno Y, Matsuda A, Morimoto H, Takagi H. 1989. Biological Efficacy of Liquid Methionine Hydroxy Analogue Free Acid in 7-18-Day-Old and 42-54-Day-Old Broilers. Japan Poultry Science Association Autumn Meeting, Kagawa.
25. Rodehutscord M, Pack M. 1999. Estimates of essential amino acid requirements from dose-response studies with rainbow trout and broiler chicken: Effect of mathematical model. Archives of Animal Nutrition 52, 223-244.
26. Rostagno HS, Barbosa WA. 1995. Biological efficacy and absorption of DL-methionine hydroxy analog free acid compared to DL-methionine in chickens as affected by heat stress. British Poultry Science 36, 303-312.
27. Saunderson CL. 1991. Metabolism of methionine and its nutritional analogs. Poultry International 30, 34-38.
28. Smulikowska S, Rutkowski A. 2005. Zalecenia Żywieniowe I Wartość Pokarmova Pasz. Normy Żywienia Drobiu. Instytut Fizjologii i Żywienia Zwierzat im, Jana Kielanowskiego.
29. Statistical Analysis Software (SAS). 1990. SAS/STAT User's Guide: Statistics. Release 6.08. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
30. Steel RGD, Torrie JH. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: a Biochemical Approach, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York.
31. Thomas OP, Tamplin C, Crissey SD, Bossard E, Zuckerman A. 1991. An evaluation of methionine hydroxy analog free acid using a nonlinear (exponential) bioassay. Poultry Science 70, 605-610.
32. Uzu G. 1983. Comparison of nutritional efficacy of DL-methionine and its hydroxy analog free acid in broilers. Rhône-Poulenc Feed Additives Development 125 (Poultry 255), 33.
33. Uzu G. 1985. Nutritional efficacy of 'Methionine hydroxy analog acid': Comparison with pure and diluted DL Methionine. In: Proceedings of the 5th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, pp. 148-149, Jerusalem.
34. van Weerden EJ van, Schutte JB, Bertram HL. 1992. Utilization of the polymers of methionine hydroxy analogue free acid (MHA-FA) in broiler chicks. Archives Geflügelk 56, 63-68
35. Vieira S, Hoehler D, Lemme A, Pophal S, Ebert A, Eichner G. 2004. Comparison of methionine sources based on an equimolar trial design with broiler chickens in Brazil (Abstract). Poultry Science 83 (Suppl. 1), 430-431.
36. Wallis IR. 1999. Dietary supplements of methionine increase breast meat yield and decrease abdominal fat in growing broiler chickens. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 39, 131-141.