Contingency fit, institutional fit, and firm performance: A metafit approach to organization-environment relationships

Organization Science

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1040-1054

  Volberda, Henk W ^a   van der Weerdt, Niels ^a   Verwaal, Ernst ^b   Stienstra, Marten ^a   Verdu, Antonio J ^c  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^c MIGUEL HERNÁNDEZ UNIVERSITY   (Spain)

Author keywords

Contingency fit; Environmental turbulence; External legitimacy; Firm performance; Institutional environment; Institutional fit; Metafit; Organization design; Organizational effectiveness; Organizational field; Quasi fit; Task environment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867037077     PISSN: 10477039     EISSN: 15265455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0687     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Anderson, J. C., D. W. Gerbing. 1988. Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach. Psych. Bull. 103(3) 411-42
2. Argyris, C., D. A. Schon. 1978. Organizational Learning: A Theory in Action Perspective. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
3. Ashby, W. R. 1956. An Introduction to Cybernetics. Chapman & Hall, London.
4. Bagozzi, R. P., Y. Yi, L. W. Phillips. 1991. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(3) 421-45
5. Barreto, I., C. W. F. Baden-Fuller. 2006. To conform or to perform? Mimetic behaviour, legitimacy-based groups and performance consequences. J. Management Stud. 43(7) 1559-158
6. Bate, P. 1984. The impact of organizational culture on approaches to organizational problem-solving. Organ. Stud. 5(1) 43-6
7. Baum, J. A. C., C. Oliver. 1991. Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(2) 187-218
8. Bentler, P. M., D. G. Bonett. 1980. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psych. Bull. 88(3) 588-606
9. Birkinshaw, J., R. Nobel, J. Ridderstråle. 2002. Knowledge as a contingency variable: Do the characteristics of knowledge predict organization structure? Organ. Sci. 13(3) 274-289
10. Blau, P. M. 1970. A formal theory of differentiation in organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 35(2) 201-218
11. Boiral, O. 2003. ISO 9000: Outside the iron cage. Organ. Sci. 14(6) 720-737
12. Bourgeois, L. J., III. 1980. Performance and consensus. Strategic Management J. 1(3) 227-248
13. Briggs, S. R., J. M. Cheek. 1988. On the nature of self-monitoring: Problems with assessment, problems with validity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 54(4) 663-678
14. Burns, T., G. M. Stalker. 1961. The Management of Innovation. Tavistock, London.
15. Burton, R. M., B. Obel. 2004. Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: The Dynamics of Fit. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
16. Burton, R. M., J. Lauridsen, B. Obel. 2002. Return on assets loss from situational and contingency misfits. Management Sci. 48(11) 1461-1485
17. Burton, R. M., J. Lauridsen, B. Obel. 2003. Erratum: Return on assets loss from situational and contingency misfits. Management Sci. 49(8) 1119
18. Burton, R. M., B. H. Erikson, D. D. Håkonsson, T. Knudsen, C. C. Snow, eds. 2008. Designing Organizations: 21st Century Approaches. Springer, New York.
19. Camerer, C., A. Vepsalainen. 1988. The economic efficiency of corporate culture. Strategic Management J. 9(S1) 115-126
20. Carroll, G. R. 1993. A sociological view on why firms differ. Strategic Management J. 14(4) 237-249
21. Child, J., L. Chung, H. Davies. 2003. The performance of crossborder units in China: A test of natural selection, strategic choice and contingency theories. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 34(3) 242-25 Quart 54(3) 413-45
22. Deephouse, D. L. 1999. To be different, or to be the same? It's a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management J. 20(2) 147-166
23. Dess, G. G., R. B. Robinson Jr. 1984. Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management J. 5(3) 265-273
24. Dill, W. R. 1958. Environments as an influence on managerial autonomy. Admin. Sci. Quart. 2(4) 409-443
25. DiMaggio, P. J. 1991. Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: U.S. art museums, 1920-1940. W. W. Powell, P. J. DiMaggio, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 267-92
26. DiMaggio, P. J., W. W. Powell. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2) 147-60
27. Dobrev, S. D., G. R. Carroll. 2003. Size (and competition) among organizations: Modeling scale-based selection among automobile producers in four major countries, 1885-1981. Strategic Management J. 24(6) 541-58
28. Donaldson, L. 1987. Strategy and structural adjustment to regain fit and performance: In defense of contingency theory. J. Management Stud. 24(1) 1-24
29. Donaldson, L. 2001. The Contingency Theory of Organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
30. Donaldson, L. 2008a. Resolving the conflict between contingency and institutional theories of organizational design. R. M. Burton, B. H. Erikson, D. D. Håkonsson, T. Knudsen, C. C. Snow, eds. Designing Organizations: 21st Century Approaches. Springer, New York, 21-4
31. Donaldson, L. 2008b. The conflict between contingency and institutional theories of organizational design. R. M. Burton, B. H. Erikson, D. D. Håkonsson, T. Knudsen, C. C. Snow, eds. Designing Organizations: 21st Century Approaches. Springer, New York, 3-20
32. Drazin, R., A. H. Van de Ven. 1985. Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30(4) 514-39
33. Duncan, R. B. 1972. Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainties. Admin. Sci. Quart. 17(3) 313-27
34. Emery, F. E., E. Trist. 1965. The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations 18(1) 21-31
35. Fines, C. H. 1998. Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage. Perseus, Reading, MA.
36. Fornell, C., D. F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18(1) 39-50
37. Glick, W. H. 1985. Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Acad. Management Rev. 10(3) 601-16
38. Greening, D. W., B. Gray. 1994. Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Acad. Management J. 37(3) 467-98
39. Greenwood, R., C. R. Hinings. 1996. Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Acad. Management Rev. 21(4) 1022-054
40. Griliches, Z. 1957. Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica 25(4) 501-22
41. Gupta, P. P., M. W. Dirsmith, T. J. Fogarty. 1994. Coordination and control in a government agency-Contingency and institutional theory perspectives on GAO audits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(2) 264-84
42. Hair, J. F., Jr., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, W. C. Black. 1998 Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
43. Hambrick, D. C. 1983. Some tests of the effectiveness and functional attributes of Miles and Snow's strategic types. Acad. Management J. 26(1) 5-26
44. Haunschild, P. R., A. S. Miner. 1997. Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3) 472-500
45. Heugens, P. M. A. R., M. W. Lander. 2009. Structure! Agency! (and other quarrels): A meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization. Acad. Management J. 52(1) 61-85
46. Hickson, D. J., D. S. Pugh, D. C. Pheysey. 1969. Operations technology and organization structure: An empirical reappraisal. Admin. Sci. Quart. 14(3) 378-97
47. Hill, T. 1983. Production/Operations Management: Text and Cases. Prentice Hall, New York.
48. Hitt, M. A., L. Bierman, K. Shimizu, R. Kochhar. 2001. Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Acad. Management J. 44(1) 13-28
49. Hofer, C. W. 1975. Toward a contingency theory of business strategy. Acad. Management J. 18(4) 784-10
50. Hofstede, G., B. Neuijen, D. D. Ohayv, G. Sanders. 1990. Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(2) 286-16
51. Hrebiniak, L. G., W. F. Joyce. 1985. Organizational adaptation: Strategic choice and environmental determinism. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30(3) 336-49
52. wg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. J. Appl. Psych. 78(2) 306-09
53. Jaworski, B. J., A. K. Kohli. 1993. Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. J. Marketing 57(3) 53-70
54. Jones, A. P., L. A. Johnson, M. C. Butler, D. S. Main. 1983 Apples and oranges: An empirical comparison of commonly used indices of interrater agreement. Acad. Management J. 26(3) 507-19
55. Kondra, A. Z., C. R. Hinings. 1998. Organizational diversity and change in institutional theory. Organ. Stud. 19(5) 743-67
56. Kraatz, M. S., E. J. Zajac. 1996. Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: The causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(5) 812-83
57. Lawrence, P. R., J. W. Lorsch. 1967. Organization and Environment. Division of Research, Harvard Business School, Boston.
58. Lee, J., D. Miller. 1996. Strategy, environment and performance in two technological contexts: Contingency theory in Korea. Organ. Stud. 17(5) 729-75
59. Levinthal, D. A. 1991. Organizational adaptation and environmental selection-Interrelated processes of change. Organ. Sci. 2(1) 140-14
60. Levitt, B., J. G. March. 1988. Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14 319-33
61. Lewin, A. Y., H. W. Volberda. 1999. Prolegomena on coevolution: A framework for research on strategy and new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. 10(5) 519-53
62. Lindell, M. K., C. J. Brandt. 2000. Climate quality and climate consensus as mediators of the relationship between organizational antecedents and outcomes. J. Appl. Psych. 85(3) 331-34
63. March, J. G. 1981. Footnotes to organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 26(4) 563-57
64. Meyer, J. W., B. Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2) 340-36
65. Mintzberg, H. 1979. The Structuring of Organizations. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
66. Nadkarni, S., V. K. Narayanan. 2007. Strategic schemas, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The moderating role of industry clockspeed. Strategic Management J. 28(3) 243-27
67. Nunnally, J. 1967. Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.
68. Orru, M., N. W. Biggart, G. G. Hamilton. 1991. Organizational isomorphism in East Asia. W. W. Powell, P. J. DiMaggio, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 361-38
69. Ouchi, W. G. 1979. A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Sci. 25(9) 833-84
70. Parker, S. C., A. van Witteloostuijn. 2010. A general framework for estimating multidimensional contingency fit. Organ. Sci. 21(2) 540-55
71. Pennings, J. M. 1987. Structural contingency theory: A multivariate test. Organ. Stud. 8(3) 223-24
72. Perrow, C. 1967. A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 32(2) 194-20
73. Podsakoff, P. M., D. W. Organ. 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management 12(4) 531-55
74. Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, J. Y. Lee, N. P. Podsakoff. 2003 Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5) 879-90
75. Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Free Press, New York.
76. Priem, R. L. 1994. Executive judgment, organizational congruence, and firm performance. Organ. Sci. 5(3) 421-43
77. Pugh, D. S., D. J. Hickson, C. R. Hinings, K. M. Macdonald, C. Turner, T. Lupton. 1963. A conceptual scheme for organizational analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 8(3) 289-31
78. Roth, K., A. J. Morrison. 1992. Business-level competitive strategy: A contingency link to internationalization. J. Management 18(3) 473-48
79. Scott, W. R. 2001. Institutions and Organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
80. Scott, W. R. 2003. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
81. Siggelkow, N. 2001. Evolution toward fit. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1) 125-15
82. Smith, K. G., J. P. Guthrie, M.-J. Chen. 1989. Strategy, size and performance. Organ. Stud. 10(1) 63-8
83. Thompson, J. D. 1967. Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.
84. Tolbert, P. S., L. G. Zucker. 1983. Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935. Admin. Sci. Quart. 28(1) 22-3
85. Tolbert, P. S., L. G. Zucker. 1996. The institutionalization of the institutional field. S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, W. R. Nord, eds. Handbook of Organization Studies. Sage, London, 175-19
86. Tosi, H. L., Jr., J. W. Slocum Jr. 1984. Contingency theory: Some suggested directions. J. Management 10(1) 9-2
87. Van de Ven, A. H. 1979. Review of Organizations and Environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(2) 320-32
88. Van de Ven, A. H., R. Drazin. 1985. The concept of fit in contingency theory. B. M. Staw, L. L. Cummings, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 7. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 333-36
89. Van de Ven, A. H., D. L. Ferry. 1980. Measuring and Assessing Organizations. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
90. Venkatraman, N. 1989. Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Management Sci. 35(8) 942-96
91. Venkatraman, N., J. E. Prescott. 1990. Environment-strategy coalignment: An empirical test of its performance implications. Strategic Management J. 11(1) 1-2
92. Volberda, H. W. 1996. Toward the flexible form: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Organ. Sci. 7(4) 359-37
93. Volberda, H. W. 1998. Building the Flexible Firm: How to Remain Competitive. Oxford University Press, New York.
94. Volberda, H. W., A. Y. Lewin. 2003. Co-evolutionary dynamics within and between firms: From evolution to co-evolution. J. Management Stud. 40(8) 2111-213
95. Volberda, H. W., N. J. Foss, M. A. Lyles. 2010. Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organization field. Organ. Sci. 21(4) 931-95
96. Von Bertalanffy, L. 1951. General system theory: A new approach to unity of science. Human Biol. 23(4) 303-36
97. Washington, M., M. J. Ventresca. 2004. How organizations change: The role of institutional support mechanisms in the incorporation of higher education visibility strategies, 1874-1995. Organ. Sci. 15(1) 82-9
98. Weick, K. E. 1979. The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd ed. Random House, New York.
99. Wicks, D. 2001. Institutionalized mindsets of invulnerability: Differentiated institutional fields and the antecedents of organizational crisis. Organ. Stud. 22(4) 659-69
100. Williams, C. 2008. Comparing evolutionary and contingency theory approaches to organizational structure. R. M. Burton, B. H. Erikson, D. D. Håkonsson, T. Knudsen, C. C. Snow, eds. Designing Organizations: 21st Century Approaches. Springer, New York, 41-5
101. Woodward, J. 1965. Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, London.
102. Zajac, E. J., M. S. Kraatz, R. K. F. Bresser. 2000. Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: A normative approach to strategic change. Strategic Management J. 21(4) 429-45
103. Zeithaml, V. A., P. R. Varadarajan, C. P. Zeithaml. 1988. The contingency approach: Its foundations and relevance to theory building and research in marketing. Eur. J. Marketing 22(7) 37-6
104. Zucker, L. G. 1977. The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 42(5) 726-74
105. Zucker, L. G. 1987. Institutional theories of organization. Annual Rev. Sociol. 13 443-46