Visualizing the third dimension in virtual training environments for neurologically impaired persons: Beneficial or disruptive?

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Van Den Hoogen, Wouter ^a   Feys, Peter ^b   Lamers, Ilse ^b   Coninx, Karin ^c   Notelaers, Sofie ^c   Kerkhofs, Lore ^d   Ijsselsteijn, Wijnand ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b PHL University College   (Belgium)

^c HASSELT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^d Rehabilitation and MS Centre Overpelt   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; FEMALE; HAND; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; ROBOTICS;

ADULT; AGED; ARM; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR SKILLS; MOVEMENT; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASES; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; ROBOTICS; STROKE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VISION, BINOCULAR;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84867016588     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-73     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Sensorimotor training in virtual reality: a review. Adamovich SV, Fluet GG, Tunik E, Merians AS, NeuroRehabilitation 2009 25 29 44 19713617
2. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. Holden MK, Cyberpsychol Behav 2005 8 187 211 discussion 212-219 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.187 15971970 (Pubitemid 40847797)
3. Virtual reality and disability: emergence and challenge. Rizzo A, Disabil Rehabil 2002 24 567 10.1080/09638280110111315
4. Virtual Reality in Brain Damage Rehabilitation: Review. Rose FD, Brooks BM, Rizzo AA, Cyberpsychol Behav 2005 8 241 262 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.241 15971974 (Pubitemid 40847801)
5. Virtual Environment Applications for Neuropsychological Assessment and Rehabilitation. Rizzo AA, Buckwalter JG, van der Zaag C, Handbook of Virtual Environments New York: L.A: Earlbaum, Stanney K, 2002 1027 1064
6. The effect of the GENTLE/s robot-mediated therapy system on arm function after stroke. Coote S, Murphy B, Harwin W, Stokes E, Clin Rehabil 2008 22 395 405 10.1177/0269215507085060 18441036 (Pubitemid 351833329)
7. Robot-Assisted Therapy for Long-Term Upper-Limb Impairment after Stroke. Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, Haselkorn JK, Wittenberg GF, Federman DG, Ringer RJ, Wagner TH, Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Bever CT, Bravata DM, Duncan PW, Corn BH, Maffucci AD, Nadeau SE, Conroy SS, Powell JM, Huang GD, Peduzzi P, N Engl J Med 2010 362 1772 1783 10.1056/NEJMoa0911341 20400552
8. Robot-Based Rehabilitation of the Upper Limbs in Multiple Sclerosis: Feasibility and Preliminary Results. Carpinella I, Cattaneo D, Abuarqub S, Ferrarin M, J Rehabil Med 2009 41 966 970 10.2340/16501977-0401 19841825
9. The Armeo Spring as training tool to improve upper limb functionality in multiple sclerosis: a pilot study. Gijbels D, Lamers I, Kerkhofs L, Alders G, Knippenberg E, Feys P, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011 8 5 10.1186/1743-0003-8-5 21261965
10. Computerized Arm Training Improves the Motor Control of the Severely Affected Arm After Stroke. Hesse S, Werner C, Pohl M, Rueckriem S, Mehrholz J, Lingnau Ml, Stroke 2005 36 1960 1966 10.1161/01.STR.0000177865.37334.ce 16109908 (Pubitemid 41266534)
11. Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008 22 111 121 17876068 (Pubitemid 351287594)
12. Diagnosis and rehabilitation of patients with hemispatial neglect using virtual reality technology. Baheux K, Yoshizawa M, Tanaka A, Seki K, Handa Y, Proceedings of 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society San Francisco, CA, USA: IEEE 2004 4908 4911 (Pubitemid 40034958)
13. Virtual reality and haptics as an assessment device in the postacute phase after stroke. Broeren J, Björkdahl A, Pascher R, Rydmark M, Cyberpsychol Behav 2002 5 207 211 10.1089/109493102760147196 12123242 (Pubitemid 34760851)
14. Game design in virtual reality systems for stroke rehabilitation. Goude D, Björk S, Rydmark M, Stud Health Technol Inform 2007 125 146 148 17377254
15. Development of a 3D immersive videogame to improve arm-postural coordination in patients with TBI. Ustinova KI, Leonard WA, Cassavaugh ND, Ingersoll CD, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011 8 61 10.1186/1743-0003-8-61 22040301
16. Spatial Judgments with Monoscopic and Stereoscopic Presentation of Perspective Displays. Yeh Y-Y, Silverstein LD, Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 1992 34 583 600
17. Effectiveness of stereoscopic displays in medicine: a review. van Beurden M, IJsselsteijn W, Juola J, 3D Research 2012 3 1 13
18. The Importance of Stereo and Eye-Coupled Perspective for Eye-Hand Coordination in Fish Tank VR. Arsenault R, Ware C, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 2004 13 549 559 10.1162/1054746042545300 (Pubitemid 39580069)
19. Effects of Stereoscopic Presentation, Image Motion, and Screen Size on Subjective and Objective Corroborative Measures of Presence. IJsselsteijn WA, de Ridder H, Freeman J, Avons SE, Bouwhuis D, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 2001 10 298 311 10.1162/105474601300343621
20. Range and variability in gesture-based interactions with medical images: do non-stereo versus stereo visualization elicit different types of gestures? van Beurden MHPH, IJsselsteijn WA, IEEE VR workshop on medical virtual environments MA, USA: Walthamm 2010
21. Visual Discomfort and Visual Fatigue of Stereoscopic Displays: A Review. Lambooij M, IJsselsteijn WA, Fortuin M, Heynderickx I, J Imaging Sci Technol 2009 53 030201 14 10.2352/J.ImagingSci.Technol.2009.53.3.030201
22. Multiple sclerosis and neuro-ophthalmologic manifestations. Cerovski B, Vidović T, Petricek I, Popović-Suić S, Kordić R, Bojić L, Cerovski J, Kovacević S, Coll Antropol 2005 29 Suppl 1 153 158 16193701 (Pubitemid 41265123)
23. Ocular manifestations of multiple sclerosis. Chen L, Gordon LK, Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2005 16 315 320 10.1097/01.icu.0000179804.49842.e2 16175046 (Pubitemid 41400289)
24. Stroke and Visual Rehabilitation. Khan S, Leung E, Jay W, Top Stroke Rehabil 2008 15 27 36 10.1310/tsr1501-27 18250071 (Pubitemid 351160089)
25. Improving outcome in stroke patients with visual problems. Jones SA, Shinton RA, Age Ageing 2006 35 560 565 10.1093/ageing/afl074 16820528 (Pubitemid 44614149)
26. Cognitive impairment after stroke: frequency, patterns, and relationship to functional abilities. Tatemichi TK, Desmond DW, Stern Y, Paik M, Sano M, Bagiella E, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994 57 202 207 10.1136/jnnp.57.2.202 8126506 (Pubitemid 24050461)
27. Data Management for Multimodal Rehabilitation Games. Notelaers S, De Weyer T, Raymaekers C, Coninx K, Bastiaens H, Lamers I, 2010 Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA) Bilbao: IEEE 2010 137 141
28. Effects of shading and droplines on object localization in virtual rehabilitation for patients with neurological conditions. van den Hoogen WM, Lamers I, Baeten K, Coninx K, Feys P, Notelaers S, Kerhofs L, IJsselsteijn WA, Proceedings of 2011 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR) Zurich, Switzerland: IEEE 2011 1 6
29. Arm and hand skills: training preferences after stroke. Timmermans AAA, Seelen HAM, Willmann RD, Bakx W, de Ruyter B, Lanfermann G, Kingma H, Disabil Rehabil 2009 31 1344 1352 10.1080/09638280902823664 19479535
30. Evaluating stereoscopic displays: both efficiency measures and perceived workload sensitive to manipulations in binocular disparity. van Beurden MHPH, IJsselsteijn WA, de Kort YAW, Proceedings of SPIE 7863 San Francisco, California: SPIE 2011 786316 786317