Limitations and information needs for engineered nanomaterial-Specific exposure estimation and scenarios: Recommendations for improved reporting practices

Journal of Nanoparticle Research

Volumn 14, Issue 9, 2012, Pages

  Clark, Katherine ^a,b   Van Tongeren, Martie ^c   Christensen, Frans M ^d,e   Brouwer, Derk ^f   Nowack, Bernd ^g   Gottschalk, Fadri ^g   Micheletti, Christian ^d,h   Schmid, Kaspar ^c   Gerritsen, Rianda ^f   Aitken, Rob ^c   Vaquero, Celina ⁱ   Gkanis, Vasileios ^j   Housiadas, Christos ^j   De Ipĩa, Jesús María López ⁱ   Riediker, Michael ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR WORK AND HEALTH   (Switzerland)

^b LKC   (Switzerland)

^c INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^d JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^e COWI ^*  (Denmark)

^f TNO   (Netherlands)

^g SWISS FEDERAL LABORATORIES FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

^h Veneto NanoTech SCpA   (Italy)

ⁱ TECNALIA RESEARCH AND INNOVATION   (Spain)

^j INSTITUTE OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY   (Greece)

more..

Author keywords

Environmental and health effects; Exposure assessment; Modeling; Nanomaterials; REACH; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

HEALTH RISKS; MODELS; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; OXIDE MINERALS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

CHEMICALS REGULATION; ENGINEERED NANOMATERIALS; ENVIRONMENTAL AND HEALTH EFFECTS; ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASE; EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT; NANO-TITANIUM DIOXIDE; OCCUPATIONAL SAMPLING; REACH;

RISK PERCEPTION;

CARBON; NANOMATERIAL; SILVER; SILVER NANOPARTICLE; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; ZINC OXIDE;

AEROSOL; ARTICLE; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASE; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; LIFE CYCLE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NANOENGINEERING; NANOFABRICATION; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT;

EID: 84866994183     PISSN: 13880764     EISSN: 1572896X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-012-0970-x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Auffan M, Pedeutour M, Rose J, Masion A, Ziarelli F, Borschneck D, Chaneac C, Botta C, Chaurand P, Labille J, Bottero JY (2010) Structural degradation at the surface of a TiO2-based nanomaterial used in cosmetics. Environ Sci Technol 44:2689-2694
2. Balbus JM, Maynard AD, Colvin VL, Castranova V, Daston GP, Denison RA, Dreher KL, Goering PL, Goldberg AM, Kulinowski KM, Monteiro-Riviere NA, Oberdorster G, Omenn GS, Pinkerton KE, Ramos KS, Rest KM, Sass JB, Silbergeld EK, Wong BA (2007) Meeting report: Hazard assessment for nanoparticles-report from an interdisciplinary workshop. Environ Health Perspect 115:1654-1659
3. Borm PJ, Robbins D, Haubold S, Kuhlbusch T, Fissan H, Donaldson K, Schins R, Stone V, Kreyling W, Lademann J, Krutmann J, Warheit D, Oberdorster E (2006) The potential risks of nanomaterials: A review carried out for ecetoc. Part Fibre Toxicol 3:11
4. Bouwmeester H, Lynch I, Marvin HJ, Dawson KA, Berges M, Braguer D, Byrne HJ, Casey A, Chambers G, Clift MJ, Elia G, Fernandes TF, Fjellsbo LB, Hatto P, Juillerat L, Klein C, Kreyling WG, Nickel C, Riediker M, Stone V (2011) Minimal analytical characterization of engineered nanomaterials needed for hazard assessment in biological matrices. Nanotoxicology 5:1-11
5. Boxall ABA, Chaudhry Q, Jones A, Jefferson B, Watts CD (2008) Current and future predicted environmental exposure to engineered nanoparticles. Central Science Laboratory, Sand Hutton, UK
6. Brouwer D (2010) Exposure to manufactured nanoparticles in different workplaces. Toxicology 269:120-127
7. Brouwer DH, Semple S, Marquart J, Cherrie JW (2001) A dermal model for spray painters. Part i: Subjective exposure modelling of spray paint deposition. Ann Occup Hyg 45:15-23
8. Brouwer DH, Berges M, Virji MA, Fransman W, Bello D, Hodson L, Gabriel S, Tielemans E (2012) Harmonization of measurement strategies for exposure to manufactured nano-objects: Report of a workshop. Annal Occup Hyg 56(1):1-9. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mer099
9. Donaldson K, Stone V, Tran CL, Kreyling W, Borm PJ (2004) Nanotoxicology. Occup Environ Med 61:727-728 (Pubitemid 39178799)
10. ECETOC (2011) Targeted risk assessment (tra) tools. http://www.ecetoc. org/tra. Accessed 25 May 2011
11. ECHA (2008) Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Part d: Exposure scenario building (Version 1.1). European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). Helsinki, Finland
12. Fransman W, Cherrie J, van Tongeren M, Schneider T, Tischer M, Schinkel J, Marquart H, Warren N, Kromhout H, Tielemans E (2009) Development of a mechanistic model for the advanced reach tool (art). TNO Quality of Life, Zeist, The Netherlands
13. Geranio L, Heuberger M, Nowack B (2009) The behavior of silver nanotextiles during washing. Environ Sci Technol 43:8113-8118
14. Gottschalk F, Nowack B (2011) The release of engineered nanomaterials to the environment. J Environ Monit 13:1145-1155
15. Gottschalk F, Sonderer T, Scholz RW, Nowack B (2009) Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO2, ZnO, Ag, CNT, fullerenes) for different regions. Environ Sci Technol 43:9216-9222
16. Gottschalk F, Sonderer T, Scholz RW, Nowack B (2010) Possibilities and limitations of modeling environmental exposure to engineered nanomaterials by probabilistic material flow analysis. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:1036-1048
17. ICON (2008) Towards predicting nano-biointeractions: An international assessment of nanotechnology environment, health and safety research needs. International Council on Nanotechnology; Rice University, Houston, TX
18. 2 nanoparticle emission from exterior facades into the aquatic environment. Environ Pollut 156:233-239
19. Köhler A, Som C, Helland A, Gottschalk F (2008) Studying the potential release of carbon nanotubes throughout the application life cycle. J Cleaner Prod 16:927-937 (Pubitemid 351221324)
20. Koponen IK, Jensen KA, Schneider T (2011) Comparison of dust released from sanding conventional and nanoparticledoped wall and wood coatings. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 21:408-415
21. Linkov I, Satterstrom FK, Monica JCJ, Hansen SF, Davis TA (2009) Nano risk governance: Current developments and future perspectives. Nanotechnol Law Bus 202:203-220
22. Marquart H, Heussen H, Le Feber M, Noy D, Tielemans E, Schinkel J, West J, Van Der Schaaf D (2008) 'Stoffenmanager', a web-based control banding tool using an exposure process model. Ann Occup Hyg 52:429-441
23. Maynard AD, Warheit DB, Philbert MA (2011) The new toxicology of sophisticated materials: Nanotoxicology and beyond. Toxicol Sci 120(Suppl 1):S109-S129
24. Methner MM, Birch ME, Evans DE, Ku BK, Crouch K, Hoover MD (2007) Identification and characterization of potential sources of worker exposure to carbon nanofibers during polymer composite laboratory operations. J Occup Environ Hyg 4:D125-D130
25. Methner M, Hodson L, Geraci C (2010) Nanoparticle emission assessment technique (neat) for the identification and measurement of potential inhalation exposure to engineered nanomaterials-part a. J Occup Environ Hyg 7:127-132
26. Nieuwenhuijsen M (ed) (2003) Exposure assessment in occupational and environmental epidemiology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
27. Nyland JF, Silbergeld EK (2009) A nanobiological approach to nanotoxicology. Hum Exp Toxicol 28:393-400
28. Oberdorster G, Oberdorster E, Oberdorster J (2005) Nanotoxicology: An emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 113:823-839 (Pubitemid 40984181)
29. Royal Society (2004) Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: Opportunities and uncertainties. Science Policy Section, The Royal Society and the Royal Academy of Engineering, London
30. Savolainen K, Alenius H, Norppa H, Pylkkanen L, Tuomi T, Kasper G (2010) Risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials and nanotechnologies-A review. Toxicology 269:92-104
31. Schneider T, Brouwer DH, Koponen IK, Jensen KA, Fransman W, Van Duuren-Stuurman B, Van Tongeren M, Tielemans E (2011) Conceptual model for assessment of inhalation exposure to manufactured nanoparticles. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 21:450-463
32. Seipenbusch M, Binder A, Kasper G (2008) Temporal evolution of nanoparticle aerosols in workplace exposure. Ann Occ Hyg 52:707-716
33. Szymczak W, Menzel N, Keck L (2007) Emissions of ultrafine copper particles by universal motrols controlled by phase angle modulation. J Aerosol Sci 38:520-531 (Pubitemid 46782836)
34. US EPA (2009) Integrated science assessment for particulate matter. National Center for Environmental Assessment-RTP Division; Office of Research and Development; United States Environmental Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park, NC: EPA/600/R-608/139F
35. van Hemmen JJ, Auffarth J, Evans PG, Rajan-Sithamparanadarajah B, Marquart H, Oppl R (2003) Riskofderm: Risk assessment of occupational dermal exposure to chemicals. An introduction to a series of papers on the development of a toolkit. Ann Occup Hyg 47:595-598 (Pubitemid 37432605)
36. van Tongeren M (2011) Project final report: Development of exposure scenarios for nanomaterials (NANEX). FP7
37. project number 247794. www.nanex-project.eu. Accessed 7 Sep 2011
38. van Veen M (1995) Consexpo a program to estimate consumer product exposure and uptake. RIVM. Bilthoven, the Netherlands
39. von der Kammer F, Legros S, Larsen E, Loescher K, Hofmann T (2011) Separation and characterization of nanoparticles in complex food and environmental samples by field-flow fractionation. Trends Anal Chem 30:425-436
40. Zartarian V, Bahadori T, McKone T (2005) Adoption of an official ISEA glossary. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 15:1-5 (Pubitemid 40170978)