'Stoffenmanager', a web-based control banding tool using an exposure process model

Annals of Occupational Hygiene

Volumn 52, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 429-441

  Marquart, Hans ^a   Heussen, Henri ^b   Le Feber, Maaike ^a   Noy, Dook ^b   Tielemans, Erik ^a   Schinkel, Jody ^a   West, John ^b   Van Der Schaaf, Doeke ^a  

^a TNO   (Netherlands)

^b Expertise Centre for Chemical Risk Management   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Exposure estimation; Risk assessment; Risk management

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; MATERIALS HANDLING; OCCUPATIONAL RISKS; POLLUTION; PUBLIC POLICY;

ACTION PLANNING; CONTROL MEASURES; EXPERT USERS; EXPOSURE ESTIMATION; EXPOSURE LEVELS; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; MEDIUM-SIZED COMPANIES; PROCESS MODELLING; RISK MANAGEMENT; SCHNEIDER; SMALL- AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES; WEB-BASED CONTROL; WORKING CONDITIONS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

CARCINOGEN; MUTAGENIC AGENT;

COMPUTER PROGRAM; DANGEROUS GOODS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MATERIALS HANDLING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; WORK ENVIRONMENT; WORKPLACE;

HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; HUMANS; INTERNET; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; RESPIRATORY PROTECTIVE DEVICES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 49449098326     PISSN: 00034878     EISSN: 14753162     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/men032     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. AUVA (date unknown) Chemische Arbeidsstoffe Gefahren ermitteln und beseitigen. Wien, Austria: Allgemeine Unfallversicherungsanstalt. Available at http://www.auva.at/mediaDB/ 118581.PDF.
2. Balsat A, de Graeve J, Mairiaux P. (2003) A structured strategy for assessing chemical risks, suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises. Ann Occup Hyg; 47: 549-56.
3. Brooke IM. (1998) A UK scheme to help small firms control health risks from chemicals: toxicological considerations. Ann Occup Hyg; 42: 377-90.
4. Cherrie JW. (1999) The effect of room size and general ventilation on the relationship between near and far-field concentrations. Appl Environ Occup Hyg; 14: 539-46.
5. Cherrie JW, Schneider T. (1999) Validation of a new method for structured subjective assessment of past concentrations. Ann Occup Hyg; 43: 235-45.
6. Cherrie JW, Schneider T, Spankie S et al. (1996) New method for structured, subjective assessments of past concentrations. Occup Hyg; 3: 75-83.
7. Council Directive 89/391/EEC. (1989) Of the 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work. O J L 183;1-8.
8. Council Directive 90/394/EEC. (1990) Of the 28 June 1990 on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens at work (Sixth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC). O J L 196;1-7.
9. Council Directive 98/24/EC. (1998) Of the 7 April 1998 on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work (fourteenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/ 391/EEC). O J L 131;11-23.
10. Creely KS, Tickner J, Soutar AJ et al. (2005) Evaluation and further development of EASE model 2.0. Ann Occup Hyg; 49: 135-45.
11. European Agency for Safety and Health atWork. (2000) Future occupational safety and health research needs and priorities in the member states of the European Union. Bilbao, Spain: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work.
12. Goede HA, Tijssen SC, Schipper HJ et al. (2003) Classification of dermal exposure modifiers and assignment of values for a risk assessment toolkit. Ann Occup Hyg; 47: 609-18.
13. Heussen GAH, West J, Paulissen M et al. (2002) Initiële beoordeling van het gezondheidsrisico door de blootstelling aan gevaarlijke stoffen: door de bomen het juiste bos blijven zien. Proceedings symposium. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Dutch Occupational Hygiene Society (NVvA).
14. Kittel G, Elsigan G, Kummerer S et al. (1996) Gefahrstoff-und Sicherheitsmanagement in Europa. Forschungsbericht im Auftrag der Allgemeinen Unfallversicherungsanstalt (AUVA). Wien, Austria: AUVA.
15. Krop H, van Broekhuizen P. (2006) The AWARE code. Adequate warning and air requirement. A labeling tool for the selection of low-hazardous products. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands): IVAM.
16. Maidment SC. (1998) Occupational hygiene considerations in the development of a structured approach to select chemical control strategies. Ann Occup Hyg; 42: 391-400.
17. Nieminen M. (1998) Computer-aided chemical risk assessment. In: From protection to promotion: occupational health and safety in small-scale enterprises. Proceedings of the International Symposium, 4-6 May 1998, Helsinki, Finland. Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; pp. 134-6.
18. NVvA. (2001) Selectie en gebruik van ademhalingsbeschermingsmiddelen (selection and use of respiratory protective equipment). Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Dutch Occupational Hygiene Society.
19. Oppl R, Kalberlah F, Evans PG et al. (2003) A toolkit for dermal risk assessment and management: an overview. Ann Occup Hyg; 47: 629-40.
20. Russell RM, Maidment SC, Brooke I et al. (1998) An introduction to a UK scheme to help small firms control health risks from chemicals. Ann Occup Hyg; 42: 367-76.
21. Schuhmacher-Wolz U, Kalberlah F, Oppl R et al. (2003) A toolkit for dermal risk assessment: toxicological approach for hazard characterization. Ann Occup Hyg; 47: 641-52.
22. Tielemans E, Warren N, Schneider T et al. (2007) Tools for regulatory assessment of occupational exposure: development and challenges. J Exp Sci Environ Epidemiol; 17 (Supp. 1): S72-S80.
23. Tielemans E, Noy D, Schinkel J et al. (2008) Stoffenmanager exposure model: development of a quantitative algorithm. Ann Occ Hyg; 52.
24. Tijssen SCHA, Links IHM. (2002) Ways for SMEs to assess and control risks from hazardous substances. Report of an international workshop held on 26 & 27 November 2001. Norwich, UK: HSE Books HSE Research Report 014.
25. Vincent R, Bonthoux F. (2000) Evaluation du risque chimique. Hiérarchisation des 'risques potentiels', Cahier de notes documentaires-Hygiène et sécurité du travail, No. 178, 1er trimestre, 29-34.
26. Warren N, Goede HA, Tijssen SC et al. (2003) Deriving default dermal exposure values for use in a risk assessment toolkit for small and medium-sized enterprises. Ann Occup Hyg; 47: 619-27.