Effect of sample stratification on dairy GWAS results

BMC Genomics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Ma, Li ^a,d   Wiggans, George R ^b   Wang, Shengwen ^a   Sonstegard, Tad S ^b   Yang, Jing ^a   Crooker, Brian A ^a   Cole, John B ^b   Van Tassell, Curtis P ^b   Lawlor, Thomas J ^c   Da, Yang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^c Holstein Association USA   (United States)

^d Program on Infrastructure Policy   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIACYLGLYCEROL ACYLTRANSFERASE 1;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DAIRY CATTLE; DGAT1 GENE; EFFECT SIZE; EFFICIENT MIXED MODEL ASSOCIATION EXPEDITED METHOD; GENE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENERALIZED LEAST SQUARES METHOD; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC TRAIT; GENOME; NIBP GENE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PIGY GENE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROMOTER REGION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STRATIFICATION; STRATIFIED SAMPLE; X CHROMOSOME;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; BREEDING; CATTLE; DAIRYING; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENOTYPING TECHNIQUES; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MALE; PEDIGREE; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SELECTION, GENETIC;

BOS;

EID: 84866991925     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-536     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Devlin B, Roeder K. Genomic control for association studies. Biometrics 1999, 55:997-1004. 10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.00997.x, 11315092.
2. Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 2006, 38:904-909. 10.1038/ng1847, 16862161.
3. Kang HM, Sul JH, Service SK, Zaitlen NA, Kong S, Freimer NB, Sabatti S, Eskin E. Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 2010, 42:348-354. 10.1038/ng.548, 3092069, 20208533.
4. Zhang Z, Ersoz E, Lai C-Q, Todhunter RJ, Tiwari HK, Gore MA, Bradbury PJ, Yu J, Arnett DK, Ordovas JM, Buckler ES. Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 2010, 42:355-360. 10.1038/ng.546, 2931336, 20208535.
5. Sonstegard TS, Ma L, Van Tassell CP, Kim E-S, Cole JB, Wiggans GR, Crooker BA, Mariani BD, Matukumalli LK, Garbe JR, Fahrenkrug SC, Liu G, Da Y. Forty years of artificial selection in U.S. Holstein cattle had genome-wide signatures 2010, Leipzig, Germany: Poster presentation at 9th World Congr. Genet. Appl.Livest. Prod, [http://aipl.arsusda.gov/publish/presentations/WC9_10/WC9_10_yang_da.pdf].
6. Cole JB, Wiggans GR, Ma L, Sonstegard TS, Lawlor TJ, Crooker BA, Van Tassell CP, Yang J, Wang S, Matukumalli LK, Da Y. Genome-wide association analysis of thirty one production, health, reproduction and body conformation traits in contemporary US Holstein cows. BMC Genomics 2011, 12(1):408. 10.1186/1471-2164-12-408, 3176260, 21831322.
7. Ma L. Generalized least squares method to account for sib correlation for testing SNP single-locus and epistasis effects in genome-wide association analysis 2010, University of Minnesota: Ph.D. thesis (Chapter 3). Department ofAnimal Science.
8. Ma L, Amos CI, Da Y. Accounting for correlations among individuals for testing SNP single-locus and epistasis effects in genome-wide association analysis [abstract] 2008, International Plant & Animal Genome Conference, Plant anim genome XVIII conf abstr [online], http://www.intl-pag.org/16/abstracts/PAG16_P11_903.html.
9. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker PIW, Daly MJ, Sham PC. PLINK: a toolset for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet 2007, 81:559-575. 10.1086/519795, 1950838, 17701901.
10. Balding DJ, Nichols RA. A method for quantifying differentiation between populations at multi-allelic loci and its implications for investigating identity and paternity. Genetica 1995, 96:3-12. 10.1007/BF01441146, 7607457.
11. Zhao JH. gap: Genetic analysis package. J Stat Softw 2007, 23(i08). http://www.jstatsoft.org/v23/i08/paper.
12. Wang S, Dvorkin D, Da Y. SNPEVG: A graphical tool for SNP effect viewing and graphing [http://animalgene.umn.edu/snpevg/index.html],Version 3.1, June 6, 2012.
13. VanRaden PM. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91:4414-4423.
14. Cole JB, VanRaden PM, O'Connell JR, Van Tassell CP, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Wiggans GR. Distribution and location of genetic effects for dairy traits. J Dairy Sci 2009, 92:2931-2946. 10.3168/jds.2008-1762, 19448026.
15. Wiggans GR, VanRaden PM, Cooper TA. The genomic evaluation system in the united states: past, present, future. J Dairy Sci 2011, 94:3202-3211. 10.3168/jds.2010-3866, 21605789.
16. Barton NH. Genetic hitchhiking. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 2000, 55:1553-1562.
17. Sabeti PC, Varilly P, Fry B, Lohmueller J, Elizabeth Hostetter E, Cotsapas C, Xie X, Byrne EH, McCarroll SA, Gaudet R, Schaffner SF, Lander E & The International HapMap Consortium Genome-wide detection and characterization of positive selection in human populations. Nature 2007, 449:913-918. 10.1038/nature06250, 2687721, 17943131, Lander E & The International HapMap Consortium.
18. Rubin CJ, Zody MC, Eriksson J, Meadows JRS, Sherwood E, Webster MT, Jiang L, Ingman M, Sharpe T, Ka S, Hallböök F, Besnier F, Carlborg T, Bed'hom B, Tixier-Boichard M, Jensen P, Siegel P, Lindblad-Toh K, Andersson L. Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication. Nature 2010, 464:587-591. 10.1038/nature08832, 20220755.
19. Qin H, Morris N, Kang SJ, Li M, Tayo B, Lyon H, Hirschhorn J, Cooper RS, Zhu X. Interrogating local population structure for fine mapping in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:2961-2968. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq560, 2982153, 20889494.
20. Shriner D, Adeyemo A, Ramos E, Chen G, Rotimi CN. Mapping of disease-associated variants in admixed populations. Genome Biol 2011, 12:1-8.
21. Garbe JR, Da Y. Pedigraph: A pedigree and genealogy visualization program for drawing large complex pedigrees 2004, University ofMinnesota: Department of Animal Science, User manual version 2.3.
22. Donner A, Koval JJ. The estimation of intraclass correlation in the analysis of family data. Biometrics 1980, 36:19-25. 10.2307/2530491, 7370372.
23. Hartley HO, Rao JNK. Maximum likelihood estimation for mixed analysis of variance model. Biometrika 1967, 54:93-108.
24. Mao Y, London NR, Ma L, Dvorkin D, Da Y. Detection of SNP epistasis effects of quantitative traits using an extended kempthorne model. Physiol Genomics 2007, 28:46-52.
25. Ma L, Runesha HB, Dvorkin D, Garbe JR, Da Y. Parallel and serial computing tools for testing single-locus and epistatic SNP effects of quantitative traits in genome-wide association studies. BMC Bioinforma 2008, 9:315.
26. Zimin AV, Delcher AL, Florea L, Kelley DR, Schatz MC, Puiu D, Hanrahan F, Pertea G, Van Tassell CP, Sonstegard TS, Marçais G, Roberts M, Subramanian P, Yorke JA, Salzberg SL. A whole-genome assembly of the domestic cow. Bos taurus. Genome Biol 2009, 10(4):R42.
27. Zimin AV, Puiu D, Marcais G, Delcher A, Yorke JA, Salzberg SL. The latest high-quality bovine genome assembly, UMD Bos Taurus 3.0 [Abstract] 2010, International Plant & Animal Genome Conference, Plant anim genome XVIII conf abstr [online], http://www.intl-pag.org/18/abstracts/W17_PAGXVIII_135.html.
28. ENSEMBL Genome Browser. Release 63, June 2011 http://www.ensembl.org/index.html, ENSEMBL Genome Browser. Release 63, June 2011.
29. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov], National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).