Microarray comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis: A review

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 385-391

  Hillman, S C ^a   McMullan, D J ^b   Williams, D ^b   Maher, E R ^a,b   Kilby, M D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b BIRMINGHAM CHILDREN S HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

chromosomal abnormalities; fetal abnormalities; microarray; prenatal; ultrasound

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; KARYOTYPING; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TISSUE MICROARRAY;

CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; KARYOTYPING; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TISSUE ARRAY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84866976141     PISSN: 09607692     EISSN: 14690705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/uog.11180     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Steele MW, Breg WR Jr,. Chromosome analysis of human amniotic-fluid cells. Lancet 1966; 1: 383-385.
2. Langlois S, Duncan A,. Use of a DNA method, QF-PCR, in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2011; 33: 955-960.
3. Kimber WL, Hsieh P, Hirotsune S, Yuva-Paylor L, Sutherland HF, Chen A, Ruiz-Lozano P, Hoogstraten-Miller SL, Chien KR, Paylor R, Scambler PJ, Wynshaw-Boris A,. Deletion of 150 kb in the minimal DiGeorge/velocardiofacial syndrome critical region in mouse. Hum Mol Genet 1999; 8: 2229-2237.
4. Brackley KJ, Kilby MD, Morton J, Whittle MJ, Knight SJ, Flint J,. A case of recurrent congenital fetal anomalies associated with a familial subtelomeric translocation. Prenat Diagn 1999; 19: 570-574.
5. Fiegler H, Redon R, Carter NP,. Construction and use of spotted large-insert clone DNA microarrays for the detection of genomic copy number changes. Nat Protoc 2007; 2: 577-587.
6. Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, Biesecker LG, Brothman AR, Carter NP, Church DM, Crolla JA, Eichler EE, Epstein CJ, Faucett WA, Feuk L, Friedman JM, Hamosh A, Jackson L, Kaminsky EB, Kok K, Krantz ID, Kuhn RM, Lee C, Ostell JM, Rosenberg C, Scherer SW, Spinner NB, Stavropoulos DJ, Tepperberg JH, Thorland EC, Vermeesch JR, Waggoner DJ, Watson MS, Martin CL, Ledbetter DH,. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am J Hum Genet 2010; 86: 749-764.
7. Feuk L, Carson AR, Scherer SW,. Structural variation in the human genome. Nat Rev Genet 2006; 7: 85-97.
8. Redon R, Ishikawa S, Fitch KR, Feuk L, Perry GH, Andrews TD, Fiegler H, Shapero MH, Carson AR, Chen W, Cho EK, Dallaire S, Freeman JL, Gonzalez JR, Gratacos M, Huang J, Kalaitzopoulos D, Komura D, Macdonald JR, Marshall CR, Mei R, Montgomery L, Nishimura K, Okamura K, Shen F, Somerville MJ, Tchinda J, Valsesia A, Woodwark C, Yang F, Zhang J, Zerjal T, Zhang J, Armengol L, Conrad DF, Estivill X, Tyler-Smith C, Carter NP, Aburatani H, Lee C, Jones KW, Scherer SW, Hurles ME,. Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature 2006; 444: 444-454.
9. McCarroll SA, Kuruvilla FG, Korn JM, Cawley S, Nemesh J, Wysoker A, Shapero MH, de Bakker PI, Maller JB, Kirby A, Elliott AL, Parkin M, Hubbell E, Webster T, Mei R, Veitch J, Collins PJ, Handsaker R, Lincoln S, Nizzari M, Blume J, Jones KW, Rava R, Daly MJ, Gabriel SB, Altshuler D,. Integrated detection and population-genetic analysis of SNPs and copy number variation. Nat Genet 2008; 40: 1166-1174.
10. Bodrug SE, Roberson JR, Weiss L, Ray PN, Worton RG, Van Dyke DL,. Prenatal identification of a girl with a t(X;4)(p21;q35) translocation: molecular characterisation, paternal origin, and association with muscular dystrophy. J Med Genet 1990; 27: 426-432.
11. De Gregori M, Ciccone R, Magini P, Pramparo T, Gimelli S, Messa J, Novara F, Vetro A, Rossi E, Maraschio P, Bonaglia MC, Anichini C, Ferrero GB, Silengo M, Fazzi E, Zatterale A, Fischetto R, Previdere C, Belli S, Turci A, Calabrese G, Bernardi F, Meneghelli E, Riegel M, Rocchi M, Guerneri S, Lalatta F, Zelante L, Romano C, Fichera M, Mattina T, Arrigo G, Zollino M, Giglio S, Lonardo F, Bonfante A, Ferlini A, Cifuentes F, Van Esch H, Backx L, Schinzel A, Vermeesch JR, Zuffardi O,. Cryptic deletions are a common finding in "balanced" reciprocal and complex chromosome rearrangements: a study of 59 patients. J Med Genet 2007; 44: 750-762.
12. Hillman SC, Pretlove S, Coomarasamy A, McMullan DJ, Davison EV, Maher ER, Kilby MD,. Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 6-14.
13. Faas BH, van der Burgt I, Kooper AJ, Pfundt R, Hehir-Kwa JY, Smits AP, de Leeuw N,. Identification of clinically significant, submicroscopic chromosome alterations and UPD in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies using genome-wide 250k SNP array analysis. J Med Genet 2010; 47: 586-594.
14. Valduga M, Philippe C, Bach SP, Thiebaugeorges O, Miton A, Beri M, Bonnet C, Nemos C, Foliguet B, Jonveaux P,. A retrospective study by oligonucleotide array-CGH analysis in 50 fetuses with multiple malformations. Prenat Diagn 2010; 30: 333-341.
15. D'Amours G, Kibar Z, Mathonnet G, Fetni R, Tihy F, Desilets V, Nizard S, Michaud J, Lemyre E,. Whole-genome array CGH identifies pathogenic copy number variations in fetuses with major malformations and a normal karyotype. Clin Genet 2012; 81: 128-141.
16. Leung TY, Vogel I, Lau TK, Chong W, Hyett JA, Petersen OB, Choy KW,. Identification of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency and apparently normal karyotype. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38: 314-319.
17. Evangelidou P, Sismani C, Ioannides M, Christodoulou C, Koumbaris G, Kallikas I, Georgiou I, Velissariou V, Patsalis PC,. Clinical application of whole-genome array CGH during prenatal diagnosis: Study of 25 selected pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings or apparently balanced structural aberrations. Mol Cytogenet 2010; 3: 24.
18. Park SJ, Jung EH, Ryu RS, Kang HW, Ko JM, Kim HJ, Cheon CK, Hwang SH, Kang HY,. Clinical implementation of whole-genome array CGH as a first-tier test in 5080 pre and postnatal cases. Mol Cytogenet 2011; 4: 12.
19. Fiorentino F, Caiazzo F, Napolitano S, Spizzichino L, Bono S, Sessa M, Nuccitelli A, Biricik A, Gordon A, Rizzo G, Baldi M,. Introducing array comparative genomic hybridization into routine prenatal diagnosis practice: a prospective study on over 1000 consecutive clinical cases. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 1270-1282.
20. Maya I, Davidov B, Gershovitz L, Zalzstein Y, Taub E, Coppinger J, Shaffer LG, Shohat M,. Diagnostic utility of array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in a prenatal setting. Prenat Diagn 2010; 30: 1131-1137.
21. Wapner R,; Prenatal Microarray Study Group, NICHD, Bethesda, MD. A multicenter, prospective, masked comparison of chromosomal microarray with standard karyotyping for routine and high risk prenatal diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206: S2.
22. Lee CN, Lin SY, Lin CH, Shih JC, Lin TH, Su YN,. Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation for prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 3171 pregnancies. BJOG 2012; 119: 614-625.
23. Srebniak MI, Boter M, Oudesluijs GO, Cohen-Overbeek T, Govaerts LC, Diderich KE, Oegema R, Knapen MF, van de Laar IM, Joosten M, Van Opstal D, Galjaard RJ,. Genomic SNP array as a gold standard for prenatal diagnosis of foetal ultrasound abnormalities. Mol Cytogenet 2012; 5: 14.
24. Jamain S, Quach H, Betancur C, Rastam M, Colineaux C, Gillberg IC, Soderstrom H, Giros B, Leboyer M, Gillberg C, Bourgeron T,. Mutations of the X-linked genes encoding neuroligins NLGN3 and NLGN4 are associated with autism. Nat Genet 2003; 34: 27-29.
25. Laumonnier F, Bonnet-Brilhault F, Gomot M, Blanc R, David A, Moizard MP, Raynaud M, Ronce N, Lemonnier E, Calvas P, Laudier B, Chelly J, Fryns JP, Ropers HH, Hamel BC, Andres C, Barthelemy C, Moraine C, Briault S,. X-linked mental retardation and autism are associated with a mutation in the NLGN4 gene, a member of the neuroligin family. Am J Hum Genet 2004; 74: 552-557.
26. Rooms L, Reyniers E, Scheers S, van Luijk R, Wauters J, Van Aerschot L, Callaerts-Vegh Z, D'Hooge R, Mengus G, Davidson I, Courtens W, Kooy RF,. TBP as a candidate gene for mental retardation in patients with subtelomeric 6q deletions. Eur J Hum Genet 2006; 14: 1090-1096.
27. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 446: array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 1161-1163.
28. Novelli A, Grati FR, Ballarati L, Bernardini L, Bizzoco D, Camurri L, Casalone R, Cardarelli L, Cavalli P, Ciccone R, Clementi M, Dalpra L, Gentile M, Gelli G, Grammatico P, Malacarne M, Nardone AM, Pecile V, Simoni G, Zuffardi O, Giardino D,. Microarray application in prenatal diagnosis: a position statement from the cytogenetics working group of the Italian Society of Human Genetics (SIGU), November 2011. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 384-388.
29. Lo YM, Corbetta N, Chamberlain PF, Rai V, Sargent IL, Redman CW, Wainscoat JS,. Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum. Lancet 1997; 350: 485-487.
30. Costa JM, Benachi A, Gautier E, Jouannic JM, Ernault P, Dumez Y,. First-trimester fetal sex determination in maternal serum using real-time PCR. Prenat Diagn 2001; 21: 1070-1074.
31. Daniels G, Finning K, Martin P, Massey E,. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal blood group phenotypes: current practice and future prospects. Prenat Diagn 2009; 29: 101-107.
32. Norbury G, Norbury CJ,. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders: how close are we? Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2008; 13: 76-83.
33. Ansorge WJ,. Next-generation DNA sequencing techniques. N Biotechnol 2009; 25: 195-203.
34. Lo YM, Chiu RW,. Next-generation sequencing of plasma/serum DNA: an emerging research and molecular diagnostic tool. Clin Chem 2009; 55: 607-608.
35. Xiao L, Zhang J, Sirois P, He N, Li K,. A new strategy for next generation sequencing: merging the Sanger's method and the sequencing by synthesis through replacing extension. J Biomed Nanotechnol 2011; 7: 568-571.
36. Bi W, Breman AM, Venable SF, Eng PA, Sahoo T, Lu XY, Patel A, Beaudet AL, Cheung SW, White LD,. Rapid prenatal diagnosis using uncultured amniocytes and oligonucleotide array CGH. Prenat Diagn 2008; 28: 943-949.
37. Shaffer LG, Coppinger J, Alliman S, Torchia BA, Theisen A, Ballif BC, Bejjani BA,. Comparison of microarray-based detection rates for cytogenetic abnormalities in prenatal and neonatal specimens. Prenat Diagn 2008; 28: 789-795.
38. Sahoo T, Cheung SW, Ward P, Darilek S, Patel A, del, Gaudio D, Kang SH, Lalani SR, Li J, McAdoo S, Burke A, Shaw CA, Stankiewicz P, Chinault AC, Van den Veyver IB, Roa BB, Beaudet AL, Eng CM,. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities using array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Genet Med 2006; 8: 719-727.
39. Le Caignec C, Boceno M, Saugier-Veber P, Jacquemont S, Joubert M, David A, Frebourg T, Rival JM,. Detection of genomic imbalances by array based comparative genomic hybridisation in fetuses with multiple malformations. J Med Genet 2005; 42: 121-128.
40. Tyreman M, Abbott KM, Willatt LR, Nash R, Lees C, Whittaker J, Simonic I,. High resolution array analysis: diagnosing pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings. J Med Genet 2009; 46: 531-541.
41. Coppinger J, Alliman S, Lamb AN, Torchia BS, Bejjani BA, Shaffer LG,. Whole-genome microarray analysis in prenatal specimens identifies clinically significant chromosome alterations without increase in results of unclear significance compared to targeted microarray. Prenat Diagn 2009; 29: 1156-1166.
42. Vialard F, Molina Gomes D, Leroy B, Quarello E, Escalona A, Le Sciellour C, Serazin V, Roume J, Ville Y, de Mazancourt P, Selva J,. Array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis: another experience. Fetal Diagn Ther 2009; 25: 277-284.
43. Kleeman L, Bianchi DW, Shaffer LG, Rorem E, Cowan J, Craigo SD, Tighiouart H, Wilkins-Haug LE,. Use of array comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with sonographic anomalies and normal metaphase karyotype. Prenat Diagn 2009; 29: 1213-1217.