Spatial interaction models from Irish commuting data: Variations in trip length by occupation and gender

Journal of Geographical Systems

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 357-387

  O'Kelly, Morton E ^a   Niedzielski, Michael A ^b   Gleeson, Justin ^c  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA   (United States)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Commuting; Journey to work; Spatial interaction

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; COMMUTING; DATA SET; JOURNEY TO WORK; LOCATION-ALLOCATION MODEL; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TRAVEL DEMAND; TRAVEL TIME;

IRELAND;

EID: 84866952473     PISSN: 14355930     EISSN: 14355949     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10109-011-0159-3     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alonso W (1964) Location and land use: toward a general theory of land rent. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
2. Buliung RN, Kanaroglou PS (2002) Commute minimization in the Greater Toronto Area: applying a modified excess commute. J Transp Geogr 10(3): 177-186.
3. Cubukgil A, Miller EJ (1982) Occupational status and the journey-to-work. Transportation 11(3): 251-276.
4. Evans SP (1973) A relationship between the gravity model for trip distribution and the transportation problem in linear programming. Transp Res 7(1): 39-61.
5. Fan Y, Khattak A, Rodriguez D (2011) Household excess travel and neighbourhood characteristics: associations and trade-offs. Urban Stud 48(6): 1235-1253.
6. Giuliano G, Small KA (1993) Is the journey to work explained by urban structure? Urban Stud 30(9): 1485-1500.
7. Grigg TJ (1984) Probabilistic versions of the short-run Herbert-Stevens model. Environ Plann A 16(6): 715-732.
8. Hamilton B (1982) Wasteful commuting. J Political Econ 90(5): 1035-1053.
9. Hamilton B (1989) Wasteful commuting again. J Political Econ 97(6): 1497-1504.
10. Handy S, Weston L, Mokhtarian PL (2005) Driving by choice or necessity? Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 39(2-3): 183-203.
11. Hanson S, Johnston I (1985) Gender differences in work-trip length: explanations and implications. Urban Geogr 6(3): 193-219.
12. Herbert JD, Stevens BH (1960) A model for the distribution of residential activity in urban areas. J Reg Sci 2(2): 21-36.
13. Hincks S, Wong C (2010) The spatial interaction of housing and labour markets: commuting flow analysis of North West England. Urban Stud 47(3): 620-649.
14. Horner MW (2002) Extensions to the concept of excess commuting. Environ Plann A 34(3): 543-566.
15. Horton FE, Wittick RI (1969) A spatial model for examining the journey-to-work in a planning context. Prof Geogr 21(4): 223-226.
16. Irish Times (2003) Driving me crazy series on commuting counties April 26-May 8.
17. Kawabata M (2009) Spatiotemporal dimensions of modal accessibility disparity in Boston and San Francisco. Environ Plann A 41(1): 183-198.
18. Lang RE (2003) Edgeless cities: examining the noncentered metropolis. Brookings Institution Press, Washington.
19. Lin J-J, Yang A-T (2009) Structural analysis of how urban form impacts travel demand: evidence from Taipei. Urban Stud 46(9): 1951-1967.
20. Lyons G, Chatterjee K (2008) A human perspective on the daily commute: costs benefits and trade-offs. Transp Rev 28(2): 181-198.
21. Ma K-R, Banister D (2006) Excess commuting: a critical review. Transp Rev 26(6): 749-767.
22. Marion B, Horner M (2007) Comparison of socioeconomic and demographic profiles of extreme commuters in several US metropolitan statistical areas. Transp Res Rec 2013: 38-45.
23. Melo Patricia C, Graham DJ, Noland RB (2011) The effect of labour market spatial structure on commuting in England and Wales. J Econ Geogr. doi: 101093/jeg/lbr011. First published online: June 6 2011.
24. Mokhtarian PL et al (2004) Telecommuting residential location and commute-distance traveled: evidence from state of California employees. Environ Plann A 36(10): 1877-1897.
25. Morgenroth ELW (2002) Commuting in Ireland: an analysis of inter-county commuting flows. Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin.
26. Murphy E, Killen JE (2011) Commuting economy an alternative approach for assessing regional. Commut Effic Urban Stud 48(6): 1255-1272.
27. O'Kelly ME (2010) Entropy-based spatial interaction models for trip distribution. Geograp Anal 42(4): 472-487.
28. O'Kelly ME, Niedzielski MA (2009) Are long commute distances inefficient and disorderly? Environ Plann A 41(11): 2741-2759.
29. Osland L (2010) Spatial variation in job accessibility and gender: an intraregional analysis using hedonic house-price estimation. Environ Plann A 42(9): 2220-2237.
30. Sang S, O'Kelly M, Kwan M-P (2011) Examining commuting patterns: results from a journey-to-work model disaggregated by gender and occupation. Urban Stud 48(5): 891-905.
31. Senior ML, Wilson AG (1974) Explorations and syntheses of linear programming and spatial interaction models of residential location. Geograp Anal 6(3): 209-238.
32. Shearmur R (2006) Travel from home: an economic geography of commuting distances in montreal. Urban Geograp 27(4): 330-359.
33. Simpson W (1987) Workplace location, residential location, and urban commuting. Urban Stud 24(2): 119-128.
34. Stabler JC et al (1996) Spatial labor markets and the rural labor force. Growth Change 27(2): 206-230.
35. Watts MJ (2009) The impact of spatial imbalance and socioeconomic characteristics on average distance commuted in the Sydney metropolitan area. Urban Stud 46(2): 317-339.
36. Webber MJ (1980) A theoretical analysis of aggregation in spatial interaction models. Geograp Anal 12(2): 129-141.
37. Wheaton WC (1974) Linear programming and locational equilibrium: the Herbert-Stevens model revisited. J Urban Econ 1(3): 278-287.
38. Wilson AG (1974) Urban and regional models in geography and planning. Wiley, London.