Connections among Decision Field Theory models of cognition

Journal of Mathematical Psychology

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 287-296

  Huang, Kai ^a   Sen, Suvrajeet ^b   Szidarovszky, Ferenc ^c  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision Field Theory; Diffusion process; Markov chain; Parallel sampling; Sequential sampling

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866865533     PISSN: 00222496     EISSN: 10960880     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2012.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Arnold L. Stochastic differential equations 1974, Wiley, New York.
2. Bhattacharya R.N., Waymire E.C. Stochastic processes with applications 1990, Wiley, New York.
3. Bogacz R., Brown E., Moehlis J., Holmes P., Cohen J.D. The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced choice tasks. Psychological Review 2006, 113(4):700-765.
4. Busemeyer J.R., Diederich A. Survey of decision field theory. Mathematical Social Sciences 2002, 43:345-370.
5. Busemeyer J.R., Goldstein D. Linking together different measures of preference: a dynamic model of matching derived from decision field theory. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 1992, 52(3):370-396.
6. Busemeyer, J.R., & Johnson, J.G. (2004). Computational models of decision making. In Koehler, D. and Harvey, N. (Eds.), Handbook of judgement and decision making. Oxford, England (pp. 133-154).
7. Busemeyer J.R., Townsend J.T. Fundamental derivations from decision field theory. Mathematical Social Sciences 1992, 23:255-282.
8. Busemeyer J.R., Townsend J.T. Decision field theory: a dynamic cognition approach to decision making. Psychological Review 1993, 100:432-459.
9. DeGroot M.H. Optimal statistical decisions 1970, McGraw-Hill, New York.
10. Diederich A. Dynamic stochastic models for decision making under time constraints. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1997, 41:260-274.
11. Diederich A. Mdft account of decision making under time pressure. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2003, 10(1):157-166.
12. Diederich A., Busemeyer J.R. Simple matrix methods for analyzing diffusion models of choice probability, choice response time, and simple response time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2003, 47:304-322.
13. Durrett R. Essentials of stochastic processes 1999, Springer-Verlag.
14. Fishman G. Monte Carlo 2003, Springer.
15. Gardiner C.W. Handbook of stochastic methods for physics, chemistry and natural sciences 1985, Springer-Verlag.
16. Gold J.I., Shadlen M.N. Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience 2001, 5:10-16.
17. Gold J.I., Shadlen M.N. Banburismas and the brain: decoding the relationship between sensory stimuli, decisions and reward. Neuron 2002, 36(2):299-308.
18. Gottfried B.S. Elements of stochastic process simulation 1983, Prentice Hall.
19. Gratton G., Coles M.G., Sirevaag E.J., Erickson C.J., Donchin E. Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1988, 14:331-344.
20. Green D.M., Swets J.A. Signal detection theory and psychophysics 1966, Wiley, New York.
21. Grossberg S. Studies of mind and brain: neural principles of learning, perception, development, cognition and motor control 1982, Reidel, Hingham: MA.
22. Grossberg S. Neural networks and natural intelligence 1988, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
23. Grossberg S., Gutowski W.E. Neural dynamics of decision making under risk: affective balance and cognitive-emotional interacdtions. Psychological Review 1987, 94(3):300-318.
24. Johnson J.G., Busemeyer J.R. A dynamic, stochastic, computational model of preference reversal phenomenon. Psychological Review 2005, 112(4):841-861.
25. Karlin S., Talyor H.M. A first course in stochastic processes 1975, Academic Press, New York.
26. Karlin S., Talyor H.M. A second course in stochastic processes 1981, Academic Press, New York.
27. Luce R.D. Response times 1986, Oxford University Press, New York.
28. Luce R.D. Utility of gains and losses 2000, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
29. Marr D. Vision 1982, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
30. McClelland J.L., Rumelhart D.E. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 1981, 88:375-407.
31. Ratcliff R. International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences 2001, Elsevier Science.
32. Ratcliff R., Smith P.L. A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice response time. Psychological Review 2004, 111(2):333-367.
33. Riley B.D. Stochastic simulation 1987, Wiley, New York.
34. Roe R.M., Busemeyer J.R., Townsend J.T. Multialternative decision field theory: a dynamic connectionist model of decision making. Psychological Review 2001, 108(2):370-392.
35. Handbook of statistics 21: stochastic processes: modeling and simulation 2003, Elsevier Publishing Company. D.N. Shanbhag, C.R. Rao (Eds.).
36. Smith P.L. Stochastic dynamic models of response time and accuracy: a foundational primer. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2000, 44(3):408-463.
37. Smith P.L., Ratcliff R. Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions. Trends in Neurosciences 2004, 27(3):161-168.
38. Townsend J.T. Serial vs. parallel processing: sometimes they look like tweedledum and tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished. Psychological Science 1990, 1(1):46-54.
39. Townsend J.T., Busemeyer J.R. Approach-avoidance: return to dynamic decision behavior. Current issues in cognitive processes: Tulane Flowerree symposium on cognition 1989, 107-133. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. C. Izawa (Ed.).
40. Townsend J.T., Wenger M.J. The serial-parallel dilemma: a case study in a linkage of theory and method. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2004, 11(3):391-418.
41. Usher B., McClelland J.L. The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review 2001, 108(3):350-392.
42. Usher B., McClelland J.L. Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multialternative choice. Psychological Review 2004, 111(3):757-769.