Tag-based interaction in online and mobile banking: A preliminary study of the effect on usability

APCHI'12 - Proceedings of the 2012 Asia Pacific Conference on Computer-Human Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 35-40

  Ravendran, Rajinesh ^a   MacColl, Ian ^a   Docherty, Michael ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Banking; Customization; Interaction; Tags; Usability; User satisfaction

Indexed keywords

BANKING; CUSTOMIZATION; INTERACTION; TAGS; USABILITY; USER SATISFACTION;

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; USABILITY ENGINEERING;

CELLULAR TELEPHONE SYSTEMS;

EID: 84866840839     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2350046.2350056     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Smith, G. Tagging: emerging trends. The Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, August/September, 34, 6 (2008).
2. Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D. and Davis, M. HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read. In Proc. Hypertext and Hypermedia 2006. ACM.
3. Durao, F. and Dolog, P. A personalized tag-based recommendation in social web systems. In Proc. International Workshop on Adaptation and Personalization for Web 2.0 2009. Citeseer.
4. Hassan-Montero, Y. and Herrero-Solana, V. Improving tag-clouds as visual information retrieval interfaces. In Proc. Multidisciplinary Information Sciences and Technologies 2006. Citeseer.
5. Qi Xin, M., Uddin, M. N. and Geun-Sik, J. The wordNet based semantic relationship between tags in folksonomies. In Proc. Computer and Automation Engineering 2010.
6. Fung, T. Banking with a personalized touch: Examining the impact of website customization on commitment. Electronic Commerce Research, 9, 4 (2008), 296-309.
7. Rahim, M. M. and JieYing, L. An empirical assessment of customer satisfaction with Internet Banking applications: An Australian experience. In Proc. Computers and Information Technology 2009.
8. Kalyanaraman, S. and Sundar, S. S. The psychological appeal of personalized content in Web Portals: Does customization affect attitude and behaviors? Communication, 56, 1 (2006), 110-132.
9. Horan, T. A. and Abhichandani, T. Evaluating user satisfaction in an e-government initiative: results of structural equation modeling and focus group discussions. Information Technology Management Reviews, XVII, 4 (2006).
10. Wang, Y. S., Wang, Y. M., Lin, H. H. and Tang, T. I. Determinants of user acceptance of Internet banking: An empirical study. Service Industry Management, 14, 5 (2003), 501-519.
11. Hiltunen, M., Heng, L. and Helgesen, L. Personalized Electronic Banking Services. Springer, 2004.
12. th IFIP TC13 International Conference Workshop on Data-Centric Interaction on the Web 2011. CEUR-WS.
13. Ravendran, R., MacColl, I. and Docherty, M. Mobile banking customization via user-defined tags. In Proc. Australian Computer Human Interaction 2011. ACM.
14. Brooke, J. SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale. Taylor&Francis, London, 1996.
15. Tullis, T. S. and Stetson, J. N. A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability. In Proc. Usability Professionals' Association 2004.
16. Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T. and Miller, J. T. An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale. Human-Computer Interaction, 24, 6 (2008), 574-594.
17. Wessels, L., & Drennan, J. An investigation of consumer acceptance of M-banking. Bank Marketing, 28, 7 (2010), 547-568
18. Turner, C. W., Lewis, J. R. and Nielsen, J. Determining usability test sample size. In International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors, W. Karwowski, Ed. CRC Press, (2006), 3084-3088.