Limitation for linear maps in a class for detection and quantification of bipartite nonclassical correlation

Quantum Information and Computation

Volumn 12, Issue 11-12, 2012, Pages 944-952

  Saitoh, Akira ^a,c   Rahimi, Robabeh ^b   Nakahara, Mikio ^a  

^a KINKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATICS   (Japan)

Author keywords

Linear preservers; Nonclassical correlation

Indexed keywords

MATRIX ALGEBRA;

DENSITY MATRIX; DETECTION AND QUANTIFICATIONS; EIGEN-VALUE; HERMITICITY; LINEAR MAPS; LINEAR PRESERVER; MATRIX TRANSPOSITION; NONCLASSICAL CORRELATION; PARTIAL MAPS; QUANTUM DISCORDS;

EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS;

EID: 84866771695     PISSN: 15337146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.26421/qic12.11-12-3     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, C. A. Fuchs, T. Mor, E. Rains, P. W. Shor, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters (1999), Quantum nonlocality without entanglement, Phys. Rev. A, 59, pp. 1070-1091.
2. H. Ollivier and W. H. Zurek (2001), Quantum discord: A measure of the quantumness of correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, pp. 017901-1-4.
3. J. Oppenheim, M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki (2002), Thermodynamical approach to quantifying quantum correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett., 89, pp. 180402-1-4.
4. C. H. Bennett and S. J. Wiesner (1992), Communication via one-and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states, Phys. Rev. Lett., 69, pp. 2881-288.
5. R. Rahimi, K. Takeda, M. Ozawa, and M. Kitagawa (2006), Entanglement witness derived from nmr superdense coding, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 39, pp. 2151-2159.
6. J. Shimamura (2004), Playing games in quantum realm, PhD thesis, Osaka University, Toyonaka.
7. Ş. K. Özdemir, J. Shimamura, and N. Imoto (2004), Quantum advantage does not survive in the presence of a corrupt source: optimal strategies in simultaneous move games, Phys. Lett. A, 325, pp. 104-111.
8. A. SaiToh, R. Rahimi, and M. Nakahara (2009), Yet another framework for quantum simultaneous noncooperative bimatrix games, In M. Nakahara, Y. Ota, R. Rahimi, Y. Kondo, and M. Tada-Umezaki, editors, Molecular Realizations of Quantum Computing 2007, World Scientific (Singapore), pp. 223-242.
9. A. Nawaz and A. H. Toor, Quantum games and quantum discord, arXiv: 1012.1428 (quant-ph).
10. E. Knill and R. Laamme (1998), Power of one bit of quantum information, Phys. Rev. Lett., 81, pp. 5672-5675.
11. A. Datta, A. Shaji, and C. M. Caves (2008), Quantum discord and the power of one qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett., 100, pp. 050502-1-4.
12. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, R. Horodecki, J. Oppenheim, A. Sen De, U. Sen, and B. Synak-Radtke (2005), Local versus nonlocal information in quantum-information theory: Formalism and phenomena, Phys. Rev. A, 71, pp. 062307-1-25.
13. M. Piani, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki (2008), No-local-broadcasting theorem for multipartite quantum correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett., 100, pp. 090502-1-4.
14. A. SaiToh, R. Rahimi, and M. Nakahara (2008), Nonclassical correlation in a multipartite quantum system: Two measures and evaluation, Phys. Rev. A, 77, pp. 052101-1-9.
15. S. Luo and S. Fu (2010), Geometric measure of quantum discord, Phys. Rev. A, 82, pp. 034302-1-4.
16. B. Groisman, D. Kenigsberg, and T. Mor, "Quantumness" versus "classicality" of quantum states, quant-ph/0703103.
17. S. Luo (2008), Using measurement-induced disturbance to characterize correlations as classical or quantum, Phys. Rev. A, 77, pp. 022301-1-5.
18. A. SaiToh, R. Rahimi, and M. Nakahara (2011), Mathematical framework for detection and quantification of nonclassical correlation, Quantum Inf. Comput., 11, pp. 0167-0180.
19. A. SaiToh, R. Rahimi, and M. Nakahara (2011), Tractable measure of nonclassical correlation using density matrix truncations, Quantum Inf. Process., 10, pp. 431-447.
20. B. Dakić, V. Vedral, and Č. Brukner (2010), Necessary and sufficient condition for nonzero quantum discord, Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, pp. 190502-1-4.
21. L. Chen, E. Chitambar, K. Modi, and G. Vacanti (2011), Detecting multipartite classical states and their resemblances, Phys. Rev. A, 83, pp. 020101(R)-1-4.
22. A. Peres (1996), Separability criterion for density matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett., 77, pp. 1413-1415.
23. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki (1996), Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions, Phys. Lett. A, 223, pp. 1-8.
24. P. Horodecki (1997), Separability criterion and inseparable mixed states with positive partial transposition, Phys. Lett. A, 232, pp. 333-339.
25. A. SaiToh, R. Rahimi, and M. Nakahara (2008), Evaluating measures of nonclassical correlation in a multipartite quantum system, Int. J. Quant. Inf., 6 (Supp. 1), pp. 787-793.
26. E. P. Wigner (1959), Group Theory, Academic Press (New York).
27. E. P. Wigner (1960), Phenomenological distinction between unitary and antiunitary symmetry operators, J. Math. Phys., 1, pp. 414-416.
28. E. P. Wigner (1960), Normal form of antiunitary operators, J. Math. Phys., 1, pp. 409-413.
29. C. S. Sharma and D. F. Almeida (1990), A direct proof of wigner's theorem on maps which preserve transition probabilities between pure states of quantum systems, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 197, pp. 300-309.
30. M. Marcus (1971), Linear transformations on matrices, J. Res. Nat. Bureau Stand. B. Math. Sci., 75B, pp. 107-113.
31. C.-K. Li and N.-K. Tsing (1992), Linear preserver problems: A brief introduction and some special techniques, Linear Algebra Appl., 162-164, pp. 217-235.
32. C.-K. Li and S. Pierce (2001), Linear preserver problems, Amer. Math. Monthly, 108, pp. 591-605.
33. M. Marcus and B. N. Moyls (1959), Linear transformations on algebras of matrices, Canad. J. Math., 11, pp. 61-66.
34. H. Minc (1974), Linear transformations on nonnegative matrices, Linear Algebra Appl., 9, pp. 149-153.
35. H. Minc (1988), Nonnegative Matrices, Wiley (New York).
36. P. Lancaster and M. Tismenetsky (1985), The Theory of Matrices (2nd Ed.), Academic Press (San Diego).