Quantum advantage does not survive in the presence of a corrupt source: Optimal strategies in simultaneous move games

Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics

Volumn 325, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 104-111

  Özdemir, Şahin Kaya ^a   Shimamura, Junichi ^a   Imoto, Nobuyuki ^a,b  

^a GRADUATE UNIVERSITY FOR ADVANCED STUDIES   (Japan)

^b Kashino Diverse Brain Research Laboratory of NTT Communication Science Laboratories   (Japan)

Author keywords

02.50.Le; 03.67. a; Battle of sexes; Corrupt source; Prisoner's dilemma; Quantum game; Samaritan's dilemma

Indexed keywords

OPTIMAL SYSTEMS;

02.50.LE; 03.67.-A; BATTLE OF SEXES; CORRUPT SOURCE; PRISONER'S DILEMMA; QUANTUM GAMES; SAMARITAN'S DILEMMA;

CRIME;

ARTICLE; GAME; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; QUANTUM MECHANICS;

EID: 1942472448     PISSN: 03759601     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2004.03.042     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Rasmusen E. Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory. 2001;Blackwell, Oxford.
2. Myerson R.B. Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. 1997;Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. von Neumann J. Taub A.H. Collected Works, vol. VI. 1963;Pergamon Press.
4. Eisert J., Wilkens M., Lewenstein M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83:1999;3077.
5. Du J., Xu X., Li H., Zhou X., Han R. quant-ph/0010050.
6. Eisert J., Wilkens M. J. Mod. Opt. 47:2000;2543.
7. Meyer D.A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82:1999;1052.
8. Du J., Li H., Xu X., Shi M., Wu J., Zhou X., Han R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88:2002;137902.
9. Johnson N.F. Phys. Rev. A. 63:2001;020302.
10. Benjamin S.C., Hayden P.M. Phys. Rev. A. 64:2001;030301.
11. Flitney A.P., Ng J., Abbott D. Physica A. 314:2002;384.
12. Iqbal A., Toor A.H. Phys. Rev. A. 65:2002;052328.
13. Lee C.F., Johnson N.F. Phys. Rev. A. 67:2003;022311.
14. Lee C.F., Johnson N.F. quant-ph/0207012.
15. Özdemir Ş.K., Shimamura J., Morikoshi F., Imoto N. quant-ph/0311074.