Assessing spatial and environmental drivers of phylogenetic structure in Brazilian Araucaria forests

Ecography

Volumn 35, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 952-960

  Duarte, Leandro D S ^a   Prieto, Pablo V ^a   Pillar, Valério D ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOME; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENT; FERN; PHYLOGENETICS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPECIES POOL;

ARAUCARIA; BRAZIL; PARANA [BRAZIL];

ARAUCARIA; FILICOPHYTA; SPERMATOPHYTA;

EID: 84866769988     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07193.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ackerly D. D. and Reich P. B. 1999. Convergence and correlations among leaf size and function in seed plants: a comparative test using independent contrasts. - Am. J. Bot. 86: 1272-1281.
2. Anderson M. J. and Willis T. J. 2003. Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. - Ecology 84: 511-525.
3. APG 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. - Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 161: 105-121.
4. Baraloto C. et al. 2010. Functional trait variation and sampling strategies in species-rich plant communities. - Funct. Ecol. 24: 208-216.
5. Behling H. 2002. South and southeast Brazilian grasslands during Late Quaternary times: a synthesis. - Palaeogeogr. Palaeo cli matol. Paleoecol. 177: 19-27.
6. Blanchet F. G. et al. 2008. Forward selection of explanatory variables. - Ecology 89: 2623-2632.
7. Borcard D. and Legendre P. 2002. All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices. - Ecol. Model. 153: 51-68.
8. Borcard D. et al. 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. - Ecology 73: 1045-1055.
9. Borcard D. et al. 2004. Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multiple scales. - Ecology 85: 1826-1832.
10. Boyce C. K. et al. 2009. Angiosperm leaf vein evolution was physiologically and environmentally transformative. - Proc. R. Soc. B 276: 1771-1776.
11. Brodribb T. J. et al. 2007. Leaf maximum photosynthetic rate and venation are linked by hydraulics. - Plant Physiol. 144: 1890-1898.
12. Cavender-Bares J. et al. 2004. Phylogenetic overdispersion in Floridian oak communities. - Am. Nat. 163: 823-843.
13. Cavender-Bares J. et al. 2009. The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. - Ecol. Lett. 12: 693-715.
14. Chase M. W. and Reveal J. L. 2009. A phylogenetic classification of the land plants to accompany APG III. - Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 161: 122-127.
15. Crisp M. D. et al. 2009. Phylogenetic biome conservatism on a global scale. Nature 458: 754-756.
16. Duarte L. D. S. 2011. Phylogenetic habitat filtering influences forest nucleation in grasslands. - Oikos 120: 208-215.
17. Duarte L. D. S. et al. 2009. Macroecological analyses reveal historical factors influencing seed dispersal strategies in Brazilian Araucaria forests. - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 18: 314-326.
18. Feild T. S. and Arens N. C. 2007. The ecophysiology of early angiosperms. - Plant Cell Environ. 30: 291-309.
19. Felsenstein J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. - Am. Nat. 125: 1-15.
20. Gilbert B. and Bennett J. R. 2010. Partitioning variation in ecological communities: do the numbers add up? - J. Appl. Ecol. 47: 1071-1082.
21. Graham C. H. and Fine P. V. A. 2008. Phylogenetic beta diversity: linking ecological and evolutionary processes across space in time. - Ecol. Lett. 11: 1265-1277.
22. Graham C. H. et al. 2009. Phylogenetic structure in tropical hummingbird communities. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106: 19673-19678.
23. Hijmans R. J. et al. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. - Int. J. Climatol. 25: 1965-1978.
24. Hubbell S. P. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton Univ. Press.
25. Hueck K. 1972. As Florestas da América do Sul. - Ed. UnB/Ed, Polígono.
26. Kessler M. et al. 2011. A global comparative analysis of elevational species richness patterns of ferns. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 20: 868-880.
27. Legendre P. and Legendre L. 1998. Numerical ecology. - Elsevier.
28. Legendre P. and Anderson M. J. 1999. Distance-based redundancy analysis: testing multispecies responses in multifactorial ecological experiments. - Ecol. Monogr. 69: 1-24.
29. Leibold M. A. et al. 2010. Metacommunity phylogenetics: separating the roles of environmental filters and historical biogeography. - Ecol. Lett. 13: 1290-1299.
30. Mantel N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. - Cancer Res. 27: 209-220.
31. Nipperess D. A. et al. 2010. Resemblance in phylogenetic diversity among ecological assemblages. - J. Veg. Sci. 21: 809-820.
32. Parmentier I. and Hardy O. J. 2009. The impact of ecological differentiation and dispersal limitation on species turnover and phylogenetic structure of inselberg's plant communities. - Ecography 32: 613-622.
33. Parra J. L. et al. 2010. Incorporating clade identity in analyses of phylogenetic community structure: an example with hummingbirds. - Am. Nat. 176: 573-587.
34. Pavoine S. et al. 2011. Linking patterns in phylogeny, traits, abiotic variables and space: a novel approach to linking environmental filtering and plant community assembly. - J. Ecol. 99: 165-175.
35. Peres-Neto P. R. et al. 2006. Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. - Ecology 87: 2614-2625.
36. Pillar V. and Duarte L. D. S. 2010. A framework for metacommunity analysis of phylogenetic structure. - Ecol. Lett. 13: 587-596.
37. Punyasena S. W. et al. 2008. The influence of climate on the spatial patterning of Neotropical plant families. - J. Biogeogr. 35: 117-130.
38. Rambo B. 1951. O elemento andino no pinhal riograndense. - An. Bot. HBR 3: 7-39.
39. Rangel T. F. L.V. B. et al. 2006. Towards an integrated computational tool for spatial analysis in macroecology and biogeography. - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 15: 321-327.
40. Root H. T. and Nelson P. R. 2011. Does phylogenetic distance aid in detecting environmental gradients related to species composition? - J. Veg. Sci. 22: 1143-1148.
41. Smith A. R. et al. 2006. A classification for extant ferns. - Taxon 55: 705-731.
42. Smith T. W. and Lundholm J. T. 2010. Variation partitioning as a tool to distinguish between niche and neutral processes. - Ecography 33: 648-655.
43. Swenson N. G. 2011. Phylogenetic beta diversity metrics, trait evolution and inferring the functional beta diversity of communities. PLoS One 6: e21264.
44. Ter-Braak C. J. F. and Smilauer P. 2002. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user's guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). - Microcomputer Power.
45. Webb C. O. et al. 2008. Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution. - Bioinformatics 24: 2098-2100.
46. Westoby M. et al. 1995. On misinterpreting the 'phylogenetic correction'. - J. Ecol. 83: 531-534.
47. Wikström N. et al. 2001. Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. - Proc. R. Soc. B 268: 2211-2220.
48. Willis C. G. et al. 2010. Phylogenetic community structure in Minnesota oak savanna is influenced by spatial extent and environmental variation. - Ecography 33: 565-577.