The direct anterior approach in hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 36, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1773-1781

  Schneider, Kerstin ^a   Audigé, Laurent ^b   Kuehnel, Stefanie Peggy ^a   Helmy, Naeder ^a  

^a Bürgerspital Solothurn ^*  (Switzerland)

^b AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP HEMIARTHROPLASTY; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LEG LENGTH; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; PHYSICAL MOBILITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RANGE OF MOTION; REOPERATION; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; WALKING AID;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE MALALIGNMENT; FEMALE; FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES; HEMIARTHROPLASTY; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; LEG LENGTH INEQUALITY; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TRAUMA SEVERITY INDICES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84866735214     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1535-4     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Antapur P, Mahomed N, Gandhi R (2011) Fractures in the elderly: when is hip replacement a necessity? Clin Interv Aging 6:1-7
2. Kannan A, Kancherla R, McMahon S et al (2012) Arthroplasty options in femoral-neck fracture: answers fromthe national registries. Int Orthop 36(1):1-8
3. Leighton RK, Schmidt AH, Collier P, Trask K (2007) Advances in the treatment of intracapsular hip fractures in the elderly. Injury 38 (suppl 3):24-34
4. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Tornetta P 3rd et al (2005) Operative management of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. An international survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2122-2130
5. Frihagen F, Nordsletten L, Madsen JE (2007) Hemiarthroplasty or internal fixation for intracapsular displaced femoral neck fractures: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 335:1251-1254
6. Blomfeldt R, Törnkvist H, Eriksson K et al (2007) A randomised controlled trial comparing bipolar hemiarthroplasty with total hip replacement for displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:160-165
7. Roy L, Laflamme GY, Carrier M et al (2010) A randomised clinical trial comparing minimally invasive surgery to conventional approach for endoprosthesis in elderly patients with hip fractures. Injury 41:365-369
8. Tsukada S, Wakui M (2010) Minimally invasive intermuscular approach does not improve outcomes in bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. J Orthop Sci 15:753-757
9. Preininger B, Jesacher M, Fabsits E, Winkler T (2011) Earlier postoperative mobilization with minimally invasive hip hemiarthroplasty [in German]. Unfallchirurg 114:333-339
10. Lovell TP (2008) Single-incision direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty using a standard operating table. J Arthroplast 23 (suppl 7):64-68
11. Butler M, Forte ML, Joglekar SB et al (2011) Evidence summary: systematic review of surgical treatments for geriatric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:1104-1115
12. Pauwels F (1935) Der Schenkelhalsbruch. Ein mechanisches Problem. Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart
13. Garden RS (1964) Stability and union in subcapital fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 46:630-647
14. Tönnis D (1984) Die angeborene Hüftdyplasie und Hüftluxation. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg
15. Auffarth A, Resch H, Lederer S et al (2011) Does the choice of approach for hip hemiarthroplasty in geriatric patients significantly influence early postoperative outcomes? a randomized-controlled trial comparing the modified Smith-Peterson and Hardinge approaches. J Trauma 70:1257-1262
16. Paillard P (2007) Hip replacement by a minimal anterior approach. Int Orthop 31(suppl 1):13-15
17. Ranawat CS, Dorr LD, Inglis AE (1980) Total hip arthroplasty in protrusio acetabuli of rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:1059-1065
18. Audigé L, Goldhahn S, Daigl M et al (2011) How to document and report orthopaedic complications in clinical studies? A proposal for standardization. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. doi:10.1007/s00402-011-1384-4
19. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:17-27
20. Weiss RJ, Beckman MO, Enocson A et al (2011) Minimum 5-year follow-up of a cementless, modular, tapered stem in hip revision arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 26:16-23
21. Duncan CP, Masri BA (1995) Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect 44:293-304
22. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An endresult study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737-753
23. Foucher KC, Wimmer MA, Moisio KC et al (2011) Time course and extent of functional recovery during the first postoperative year after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty with two different surgical approaches - a randomized controlled trial. J Biomech 44:372-378
24. Müller M, Tohtz S, Dewey M et al (2011) Muscle trauma in primary total hip arthroplasty depending on age, BMI, and surgical approach: minimally invasive anterolateral versus modified direct lateral approach [in German]. Orthopäde 40:217-223
25. Smith TO, Blake V, Hing CB (2011) Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes. Int Orthop 35:173-184
26. Kreuzer S, Leffers K, Kumar S (2011) Direct anterior approach for hip resurfacing: surgical technique and complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1574-1581
27. Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T (2005) Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441:115-124
28. Mouilhade F, Matsoukis J, Oger P et al (2011) Component positioning in primary total hip replacement: a prospective comparative study of two anterolateral approaches, minimally invasive versus gluteus medius hemimyotomy. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97:14-21
29. Pospischill M, Kranzl A, Attwenger B, Knahr K (2010) Minimally invasive compared with traditional transgluteal approach for total hip arthroplasty. A comparative gait analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:328-337
30. Wohlrab D, Droege JW, Mendel T et al (2008) Minimally invasive vs. transgluteal total hip replacement. A 3-month follow-up of a prospective randomized clinical study [in German]. Orthopäde 37:1121-1126