Effects of chlortetracycline amended feed on anaerobic sequencing batch reactor performance of swine manure digestion

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 125, Issue , 2012, Pages 65-74

  Dreher, Teal M ^a   Mott, Henry V ^a   Lupo, Christopher D ^a   Oswald, Aaron S ^a   Clay, Sharon A ^b   Stone, James J ^a  

^a Department of Civil Engineering   (United States)

^b SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Antimicrobial use; Chlortetracycline; Swine manure; Swine production

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC SEQUENCING BATCH REACTORS; ANTIMICROBIAL USE; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; CHLORTETRACYCLINE; SOLUBLE CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMANDS; SWINE MANURE; SWINE PRODUCTION; VOLUMETRIC COMPOSITION;

ACETIC ACID; BIOGAS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; MANURES; METHANE; MICROORGANISMS;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

ACETIC ACID; BIOGAS; CHLORTETRACYCLINE; METHANE;

ACCLIMATION; ACETIC ACID; ANOXIC CONDITIONS; ANTIBIOTICS; BIOGAS; BIOREACTOR; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); GAS PRODUCTION; MANURE; METHANE; PIG; SLURRY;

AGRICULTURAL SLURRY; ALKALINITY; ANAEROBIC SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CHLORINATION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGESTION; DILUTION; MANURE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NONHUMAN; PH; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR; STORAGE; VOLUMETRY;

ANIMALS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BACTERIA, ANAEROBIC; BATCH CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; BIOREACTORS; CHLORTETRACYCLINE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; MANURE; REFUSE DISPOSAL; SWINE;

SUIDAE;

EID: 84866672833     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.077     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Angenent L.T., Mau M., George U., Zahn J.A., Raskin L. Effect of the presence of the antimicrobial tylosin in swine waste on anaerobic treatment. Water Res. 2008, 42:2377-2384.
2. APHA Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater 1995, American Public Health Association, New York. 19th ed.
3. Belete L., Egger W., Neunhauserer C., Caballero B., Insam H. Can community level physiological profiles be used for compost maturity testing?. Compost. Sci. Util. 2001, 9:6-18.
4. Chapin A., Rule A., Gibson K., Buckley T., Schwab K. Airborne multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated from a concentrated swine feeding operation. Env. Health. Persp. 2005, 113:137-142.
5. Cheng J. Challenges of CAFO waste management. J. Env. Eng. 2003, 129:391-392.
6. Chenier M.R., Juteau P. Fate of chlortetracycline- and tylosin-resistant bacteria in an aerobic thermophilic sequencing batch reactor treating swine waste. Microb. Ecol. 2009, 58:86-97.
7. Dewey C.E., Cox B.D., Straw B.E., Bush E.J., Hurd S. Use of antimicrobials in swine feeds in the United States. J. Swine Heal. Prod. 1999, 7:19-25.
8. Garland J., Mills A. Classification and characterization of heterotrophic microbial communities on the basis of patterns of community-level sole-carbon-source utilization. App. Env. Micro. 1991, 57:2351-2359.
9. Gomez E., Ferreras L., Toresani S. Soil bacterial functional diversity as influenced by organic amendment application. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97:1484-1489.
10. Hofman J., Svihalek J., Holoubek I. Evaluation of functional diversity of soil microbial communities-a case study. Plant Soil Environ. 2004, 50:141-148.
11. Jindal A., Kocherginskaya S., Mehboob A., Robert M., Mackie R.I., Raskin L., Zilles J.L. Antimicrobial use and resistance in swine waste treatment systems. App. Env. Micro. 2006, 72:7813-7820.
12. Kohler F., Hamelin J., Gillet F., Gobat J.M., Buttler A. Soil microbial community changes in wooded mountain pastures due to simulated effects of cattle grazing. Plant Soil 2005, 278:327-340.
13. Lallai A., Mura G., Onnis N. The effects of certain antibiotics on biogas production in the anaerobic digestion of pig waste slurry. Bioresour. Technol. 2002, 82:205-208.
14. Masse D.I., Lu D., Masse L., Droste R.L. Effect of antibiotics on psychrophilic anaerobic digestion of swine manure slurry in sequencing batch reactors. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 75:205-211.
15. Masse D.I., Masse L., Xia Y., Gilbert Y. Potential of low-temperature anaerobic digestion to address current environmental concerns on swine production. J. Anim. Sci. 2010, 88:E112-E120.
16. Salomo S., Munch C., Roske I. Evaluation of the metabolic diversity of microbial communities in four different filter layers of a constructed wetland with vertical flow by Biolog (TM) analysis. Water Res. 2009, 43:4569-4578.
17. Shimada T., Zilles J.L., Morgenroth E., Raskin L. Inhibitory effects of the macrolide antimicrobial tylosin on anaerobic treatment. Biotech. Bioeng. 2008, 101:73-82.
18. Smalla K., Wachtendorf U., Heuer H., Liu W.T., Forney L. Analysis of Biolog GN substrate utilization patterns by microbial communities. App. Environ. Microb. 1998, 64:1220-1225.
19. Sponza D.T., Celebi H. Removal of oxytetracycline (OTC) in a synthetic pharmaceutical wastewater by a sequential anaerobic multichamber bed reactor (AMCBR)/completely stirred tank reactor (CSTR) system: biodegradation and inhibition kinetics. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 104:100-110.
20. Stone J.J., Clay S.A., Zhu Z.W., Wong K.L., Porath L.R., Spellman G.M. Effect of antimicrobial compounds tylosin and chlortetracycline during batch anaerobic swine manure digestion. Water Res. 2009, 43:4740-4750.
21. Stone J.J., Oswald A.S., Lupo C.D., Clay S.A., Mott H.V. Impact of chlortetracycline on sequencing batch reactor performance for swine manure treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:7807-7814.
22. Sullivan T.S., Stromberger M.E., Paschke M.W., Ippolito J.A. Long-term impacts of infrequent biosolids applications on chemical and microbial properties of a semi-arid rangeland soil. Biol. Fert. Soils 2006, 42:258-266.
23. Weber K.P., Grove J.A., Gehder M., Anderson W.A., Legge R.L. Data transformations in the analysis of community-level substrate utilization data from microplates. J. Microb. Meth. 2007, 69:461-469.
24. Wijnand H.P., van de Velde R. Mann-Whitney/Wilcoxon's nonparametric cumulative probability distribution. Comp. Meth. Pro. Biomed. 2000, 63:21-28.
25. Zhang Z., Zhu J., King J., WenHong L. A two-step fed SBR for treating swine manure. Proc. Biochem. 2006, 41:892-900.
26. Zhou J., Guo W.H., Wang R.Q., Han X.M., Wang Q. Microbial community diversity in the profile of an agricultural soil in northern China. J. Environ. Sci. China 2008, 20:981-988.