Impact of chlortetracycline on sequencing batch reactor performance for swine manure treatment

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 102, Issue 17, 2011, Pages 7807-7814

  Stone, James J ^a   Oswald, Aaron S ^a   Lupo, Christopher D ^a   Clay, Sharon A ^b   Mott, Henry V ^a  

^a Department of Civil Engineering   (United States)

^b SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Chlortetracycline; Sequencing batch reactor; Swine manure

Indexed keywords

ACCLIMATION PERIOD; ANAEROBIC SEQUENCING BATCH REACTORS; CHLORTETRACYCLINE; GAS GENERATION; GAS PRODUCTIONS; METHANOGENESIS; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; SBR TREATMENT; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTORS; SWINE MANURE;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; MANURES;

BATCH REACTORS;

ACETIC ACID; AMMONIA; CARBON; CHLORTETRACYCLINE; METHANE; NITROGEN; PHOSPHORUS;

ACCLIMATION; ANOXIC CONDITIONS; ANTIBIOTICS; ASSESSMENT METHOD; BIOREACTOR; GAS PRODUCTION; INHIBITION; MANURE; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SPECIES DIVERSITY; UNGULATE;

ACCLIMATIZATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENSITY; GAS; MALE; MANURE; METHANOGENESIS; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; MOISTURE; NONHUMAN; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR; SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER; SWINE;

ANIMALS; CHLORTETRACYCLINE; MANURE; SWINE;

SUIDAE;

EID: 79960843612     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.06.038     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alvarez J.A., Otero L., Lema J.M., Omil F. The effect and fate of antibiotics during the anaerobic digestion of pig manure. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:8581-8586.
2. APHA, 1995. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th ed. American Public Health Association, New York.
3. Belete L., Egger W., Neunhauserer C., Caballero B., Insam H. Can community level physiological profiles be used for compost maturity testing?. Compost. Sci. Util. 2001, 9:6-18.
4. Bortone G. Integrated anaerobic/aerobic biological treatment for intensive swine production. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:5424-5430.
5. Chenier M.R., Juteau P. Fate of chlortetracycline- and tylosin-resistant bacteria in an aerobic thermophilic sequencing batch reactor treating swine waste. Microb. Ecol. 2009, 58:86-97.
6. Dague R.R., Habben C.E., Pidaparti S.R. Initial studies on the anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Water Sci. Technol. 1992, 26:2429-2432.
7. Dewey C.E., Cox B.D., Straw B.E., Bush E.J., Hurd S. Use of antimicrobials in swine feeds in the United States. Swine Health. Prod. 1999, 7:19-25.
8. Fedler C.B., Day D.L. Anaerobic digestion of swine manure containing an antibiotic inhibitor. Trans. ASABE 1985, 28:523-530.
9. Garland J., Mills A. Classification and characterization of heterotrophic microbial communities on the basis of patterns of community-level sole-carbon-source utilization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991, 57:2351-2359.
10. Gomez E., Ferreras L., Toresani S. Soil bacterial functional diversity as influenced by organic amendment application. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97:1484-1489.
11. Grady C.P.L., Daigger G.T., Lim H.C. Biological Wastewater Treatment 1999, Marcel Dekker, New York.
12. Hofman J., Svihalek J., Holoubek I. Evaluation of functional diversity of soil microbial communities - a case study. Plant Soil Environ. 2004, 50:141-148.
13. Jindal A., Kocherginskaya S., Mehboob A., Robert M., Mackie R.I., Raskin L., Zilles J.L. Antimicrobial use and resistance in swine waste treatment systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72:7813-7820.
14. Kohler F., Hamelin J., Gillet F., Gobat J.M., Buttler A. Soil microbial community changes in wooded mountain pastures due to simulated effects of cattle grazing. Plant Soil 2005, 278:327-340.
15. Kolz A.C., Moorman T.B., Ong S.K., Scoggin K.D., Douglass E.A. Degradation and metabolite production of tylosin in anaerobic and aerobic swine-manure lagoons. Water Environ. Res. 2005, 77:49-56.
16. Masse D., Gilbert Y., Topp E. Pathogen removal in farm-scale psychrophilic anaerobic digesters processing swine manure. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:641-646.
17. Masse D.I., Droste R.L., Kennedy K.J., Patni N.K., Munroe J.A. Potential for the psychrophilic anaerobic treatment of swine manure using a sequencing batch reactor. Can. Agr. Eng. 1997, 39:25-33.
18. Masse D.I., Lu D., Masse L., Droste R.L. Effect of antibiotics on psychrophilic anaerobic digestion of swine manure slurry in sequencing batch reactors. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 75:205-211.
19. Masse D.I., Masse L., Xia Y., Gilbert Y. Potential of low-temperature anaerobic digestion to address current environmental concerns on swine production. J. Anim. Sci. 2010, 88:E112-E120.
20. Ra C.S., Lo K.V., Mavinic D.S. Swine wastewater treatment by a batch-mode 4-stage process: loading rate control using ORP. Environ. Technol. 1997, 18:615-621.
21. Salomo S., Munch C., Roske I. Evaluation of the metabolic diversity of microbial communities in four different filter layers of a constructed wetland with vertical flow by Biolog (TM) analysis. Water Res. 2009, 43:4569-4578.
22. Sanz J.L., Rodriguez N., Amils R. The action of antibiotics on the anaerobic digestion process. Appl. Microb. Biotechnol. 1996, 46:587-592.
23. Shimada T., Li X., Zilles J.L., Morgenroth E., Raskin L. Effects of the antimicrobial tylosin on the microbial community structure of an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011, 108:296-305.
24. Smalla K., Wachtendorf U., Heuer H., Liu W.T., Forney L. Analysis of BIOLOG GN substrate utilization patterns by microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microb. 1998, 64:1220-1225.
25. Stone J.J., Clay S.A., Zhu Z.W., Wong K.L., Porath L.R., Spellman G.M. Effect of antimicrobial compounds tylosin and chlortetracycline during batch anaerobic swine manure digestion. Water Res. 2009, 43:4740-4750.
26. USDA, 2007. Swine 2006, Part II: Reference of Swine Health and Health Management Practices in the United States. APHIS N479-1207, Fort Collins, CO.
27. Winckler C., Grafe A. Use of veterinary drugs in intensive animal production-evidence for persistence of tetracycline in pig slurry. J. Soils Sed. 2001, 1:66-70.
28. Wong, K., 2007. MS Thesis: Development of Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction - Flame Ionization Gas Chromatography Procedure for Analysis of Short Chain Volatile Fatty Acids in Swine Manure. South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD, p. 54.
29. Zhang Z., Zhu J., King J., WenHong L. A two-step fed SBR for treating swine manure. Proc. Biochem. 2006, 41:892-900.
30. Zhou J., Guo W.H., Wang R.Q., Han X.M., Wang Q. Microbial community diversity in the profile of an agricultural soil in northern China. J. Environ. Sci. China 2008, 20:981-988.