Developing visualisation software for rehabilitation: Investigating the requirements of patients, therapists and the rehabilitation process

Health Informatics Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 171-180

  Loudon, David ^a   MacDonald, Alastair S ^a   Carse, Bruce ^b   Thikey, Heather ^b   Jones, Lucy ^b   Rowe, Philip J ^b   Uzor, Stephen ^c   Ayoade, Mobolaji ^c   Baillie, Lynne ^c  

^a GLASGOW SCHOOL OF ART   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^c GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; rehabilitation; user research; visualisation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; IMAGE PROCESSING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; KINESIOTHERAPY; METHODOLOGY; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; PILOT STUDY; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REHABILITATION; SENSORY FEEDBACK; SURVIVOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BIOMECHANICS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL THERAPISTS; PILOT PROJECTS; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REHABILITATION; SOFTWARE DESIGN; STROKE; SURVIVORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84866662502     PISSN: 14604582     EISSN: 17412811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1460458212443901     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Durward B, Baer G, Rowe P Functional Human Movement: Measurement and Analysis. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann ; 1999 :
2. Kay RM, Dennis S, Rethlefsen S, Reynolds RA, Skaggs DL, Tolo VT. The effect of preoperative gait analysis on orthopaedic decision making. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 ; 372: 217-222
3. Lofterød B, Terjesen T, Skaaret I, Huse A-B, Jahnsen R. Preoperative gait analysis has a substantial effect on orthopedic decision making in children with cerebral palsy: comparison between clinical evaluation and gait analysis in 60 patients. Acta Orthop. 2007 ; 78: 74-80
4. Toro B, Nester CJ, Farren PC. The status of gait assessment among physiotherapists in the United Kingdom. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 ; 84: 1878-1884
5. Coutts F. Gait analysis in the therapeutic environment. Man Ther. 1999 ; 4: 2-10
6. Simon SR. Quantification of human motion: gait analysis-benefits and limitations to its application to clinical problems. J Biomech. 2004 ; 37: 1869-1880
7. Laine C, Davidoff F. Patient-centered medicine. A professional evolution. JAMA. 1996 ; 275: 152-156
8. Rosewilliam S, Roskell CA, Pandyan AD. A systematic review and synthesis of the quantitative and qualitative evidence behind patient-centred goal setting in stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2011 ; 25: 501-514
9. Wartman SA, Morlock LL, Malitz FE, Palm EA. Patient understanding and satisfaction as predictors of compliance. Med Care. 1983 ; 21: 886-891
10. Teutsch C. Patient-doctor communication. Med Clin North Am. 2003 ; 87: 1115-1145
11. Loudon D, Macdonald AS. Towards a visual representation of the effects of reduced muscle strength in older adults: New insights and applications for design and healthcare. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Digital Human Modeling: Held as Part of HCI International 2009 ; ;. 540.
12. Macdonald AS, Loudon D, Rowe PJ, Samuel D, Hood V, Nicol AC, et al. Towards a design tool for visualizing the functional demand placed on older adults by everyday living tasks. Universal Access in the Information Society. 2007 ; 6: 137-144
13. Laver KE, George S, Thomas S, Deutsch JE, Crotty M. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 ; 9: CD008349
14. Holden MK. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005 ; 8: 187-211
15. Subramanian SK, Massie CL, Malcolm MP, Levin MF. Does provision of extrinsic feedback result in improved motor learning in the upper limb poststroke? A systematic review of the evidence. Neurorehab Neural Repair. 2010 ; 24: 113-124
16. Molier BI, Van Asseldonk EHF, Hermens HJ, Jannink MJA. Nature, timing, frequency and type of augmented feedback; does it influence motor relearning of the hemiparetic arm after stroke? A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2010 ; 32: 1799-1809
17. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008 ; 337: a1655
18. A Framework for the Development and Evaluation of RCTs for Complex Interventions to Improve Health. London: Medical Research Council ; 2000 :
19. Sibbald B, Roland M. Understanding controlled trials: Why are randomised controlled trials important?. BMJ. 1998 ; 316: 201
20. Lewin S, Glenton C, Oxman AD. Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study. BMJ. 2009 ; 339: b3496
21. Mazza R, Berre A. Focus group methodology for evaluating information visualization techniques and tools. Information Visualization, 2007. IV '07. 11th International Conference ; Zurich, IEEE ;. 74.
22. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Ritchie J Lewis J, ed. London: Sage Publications ; 2003 :
23. Savory C. Patient and public involvement in translative healthcare research. Clin Govern Int J. 2010 ; 15: 191-199