Authority Control for Scientific Data: The Case of Molecular Biology

Journal of Library Metadata

Volumn 12, Issue 2-3, 2012, Pages 61-82

  Wu, Shuheng ^a   Stvilia, Besiki ^a   Lee, Dong Joon ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

authority control; metadata; molecular biology; scientific data management

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866653599     PISSN: 19386389     EISSN: 19375034     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19386389.2012.699822     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Allen, R. B. 2011. "Category-based models for knowledge representation". In Information: A fundamental construct Manuscript in preparation. Retrieved fromhttp://boballen.info/ISS/
2. Ananiadou, S., Friedman, C. and Tsujii, J. 2004. Introduction: Named entity recognition in biomedicine. Biomedical Informatics, 37: 393-395. doi:10.1016/j.jbi. 2004.08.011
3. Atkins, D., Droegemeier, K., Feldman, S., Garcia-Molina, H., Klein, M., Messerschmitt, D. and Wright, M. H. 2003. Revolutionizing science and engineering through cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure, Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/od/oci/reports/atkins.pdf
4. Bard, J. B. L. and Rhee, S. Y. 2004. Ontologies in biology: Design, applications and future challenges. Nature Review Genetics, 5: 213-222. doi:10.1038/nrg 1295
5. Blaschke, C., Hirschman, L. and Valencia, A. 2002. Information extraction in molecular biology. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 3: 154-165.
6. Bodenreider, O. 2004. The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): Integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic Acids Research, 32: D267-D270. doi:10.1093/ nar/gkh061
7. Clark, T., Martin, S. and Liefeld, T. 2004. Globally distributed object identification for biological knowledgebases. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 5: 59-70. doi:10.1093/ bib/5.1.59
8. Cohen, A. M. and Hersh, W. R. 2005. A survey of current work in biomedical text mining. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 6: 57-71. doi:10.1093/bib/6.1.57
9. Crick, F. 1970. Central dogma of molecular biology. Nature, 227(5258): 561-563. doi:10.10381227561a0
10. Dalgleish, R., Flicek, P., Cunningham, F., Astashyn, A., Tully, R. E., Proctor, G. and Maglott, D. R. 2010. Locus Reference Genomic sequences: An improved basis for describing human DNA variants. Genome Medicine, 2: 24 doi:10.1186/ gm145
11. de Bruijn, L. and Martin, J. 2002. "Literature mining in molecular biology". In Proceedings of the EFMI Workshop on Natural Language Processing in Biomedical Applications, Edited by: Baud, R. and Ruch, P. 1-5. Ottawa, Canada: National Research Council of Canada.
12. den Dunnen, J. T. and Antonarakis, S. E. 2000. Mutation nomenclature extensions and suggestions to describe complex mutations: A discussion. Human Mutation, 15: 7-12.
13. Elmasri, R. and Navathe, S. 2000. Fundamentals of database systems (3rd ed.), Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
14. Field, D., Garrity, G., Gray, T., Morrison, N., Selengut, J., Sterk, P. and Wipat, A. 2008. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nature Biotechnology, 26: 541-547. doi:10.1038/1360
15. Fundel, K. and Zimmer, R. 2006. Gene and protein nomenclature in public databases. BMC Bioinformatics, 7: 372 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-372
16. Gene Ontology. 2011. GO ontology relations. Retrieved from http://www.gene-ontology.org/GO.ontology.relations.shtml
17. Gene Ontology Consortium. 2000. Gene Ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genetics, 25: 25-29. doi:10.1038/75556
18. Genomic Standards Consortium. 2011. Minimum Information about a (Meta) Genome Sequence Retrieved from http://gensc.org/gc_wiki/index.php/MIGS/MIMS
19. Go, K. and Carroll, J. 2004a. "Scenario-based task analysis". In The handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction, Edited by: Diaper, D. and Stanton, N. 117-133. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Go, K. and Carroll, J. 2004b. The blind men and the elephant: Views of scenario-based system design. Interactions, 11(6): 44-53. doi:10.1145/1029036.1029037
21. Goll, J., Montgomery, R., Brinkac, L. M., Schobel, S., Harkins, D. M., Sebastian, Y. and Sutton, G. 2010. The Protein Naming Utility: A rules database for protein nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Research, 38: D336-D339. doi:10.1093/nar/ gkp958
22. Gorman, M. 2004. Authority control in the context of bibliographic control in the electronic environment. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 38(3-4): 11-22. doi:10.1300/J104v38n03_03
23. Greenberg, J. 2009. Theoretical considerations of lifecycle modeling: An analysis of the Dryad Repository demonstrating automatic metadata propagation, inheritance, and value system adoption. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47: 380-402. doi:10.1080/01639370902737547
24. Gulley, M. L., Braziel, R. M., Halling, K. C., His, E. D., Kant, J. A, Nikiforova, M. N. and Versalovic, J. 2007. Clinical laboratory reports in molecular pathology. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 131: 852-863.
25. Higgs, P. G. and Attwood, T. K. 2005. Bioinformatics and molecular evolution, Malden, MA: Blackwell.
26. Hodge, G. 2000. Systems of knowledge organization for digital libraries: Beyond traditional authority files (CLIR Report 91), Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved from http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub91/pub91.pdf
27. Institute for Museum and Library Services. 2011. Specifications for projects that develop digital products Retrieved from http://www.imls.gov/assets/1/AssetManager/DigitalProducts.pdf
28. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. 2009. Functional requirements for bibliographic records: Final report Retrieved from http://archive.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf
29. Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA (Ed.). 2009. RDA scope and structure, Chicago, IL: American Library Association. Retrieved from http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/5rda-scoperev4.pdf
30. Juran, J. 1992. Juran on quality by design, New York, NY: Free Press.
31. Khatri, P., Sellamuthu, S., Malhotra, P., Amin, K., Done, A. and Draghici, S. 2005. Recent additions and improvements to the Onto-Tools. Nucleic Acids Research, 33: W762-W765. doi:10.1093/nar/gki472
32. Krallinger, M., Erhardt, R. A. and Valencia, A. March 2005. Text-mining approaches in molecular biology and biomedicine. Drug Discovery Today, 10: 439-445. doi:10.1016/S1359-6446(05)03376-3
33. Krallinger, M., Valencia, A. and Hirschman, L. 2008. Linking genes to literature: Text mining, information extraction, and retrieval applications for biology. Genome Biology, 9(Suppl. 2): S8-S8. 14. doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-S2-S8
34. Lambe, P. 2007. Organising knowledge: Taxonomies, knowledge and organisational effectiveness, Oxford, United Kingdom: Chadons.
35. Liu, H., Hu, Z., Zhang, J. and Wu, C. 2006. BioThesaurus: A web-based thesaurus of protein and gene names. Bioinformatics, 22: 103-105. doi:10.1093/bioinfor- matics/bti749
36. MacMullen, W. J. and Denn, S. O. 2005. Information problems in molecular biology and bioinformatics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56: 447-456. doi:10.1002/asi.20134
37. Martin, S., Hohman, M. M. and Liefeld, T. 2005. The impact of life science identifier on informatics data. Drug Discovery Today, 10: 1566-1572. doi:10.1016/S1359-6446(05)03651-2
38. National Endowment for the Humanities. 2011. Guidance for data management plans for NEH Office of Digital Humanities proposals and awards Retrieved from http://www.neh.gov/grants/guidelines/pdf/DataManagementPlans.pdf
39. National Institutes of Health. 2010. NIH data sharing policy and implementation guidance (NIH Publication No. 03-05-2003), Bethesda, MD: Author. Retrieved from http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing/data_sharing_guidance.htm#goals
40. National Library of Medicine. 2009. UMLS reference manual, Bethesda, MD: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9675/
41. National Science Board. 2005. Long-lived digital data collections: Enabling research and education in the 21st century (NSB Report No. 05-40), Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2005/nsb0540/nsb0540.pdf
42. National Science Foundation. 2007. Cyberinfrastructure vision for 21st century discovery (NSF Report No. 07-28), Arlington, VA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2007/nsf0728/nsf0728.pdf
43. National Science Foundation. 2010. Grant proposal guide (NSF Publication No. gpg11001), Arlington, VA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf11001/gpgprint.pdf
44. Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies. 2011. Archive of original principles Retrieved from http://www.obofoundry.org/crit_2006.shtml
45. Patton, G. 2009. Functional requirements for authority data: A conceptual model (FRAD) IFLA Working Group on the Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRANAR). IFLA Series on Bibliographic Control (Vol. 34). München: K. G. Saur
46. Patterson, D. J., Cooper, J., Kirk, P. M., Pyle, R. L. and Remsen, D. P. 2010. Names are key to the big new biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 25: 686-691. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.09.004
47. Pruitt, K. D., Tatusova, T., Klimke, W. and Maglott, D. R. 2009. NCBI Reference Sequences: Current status, policy and new initiatives. Nucleic Acid Research, 37: D32-D36. doi:10.1093/nar/gkn721
48. Pruitt, K. D., Tatusova, T. and Maglott, D. R. 2005. NCBI Reference Sequence (RefSeq): A curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins. Nucleic Acids Research, 33: D501-D504. doi:10.1093/nar/gki025
49. San Gil, I., Hutchison, V., Frame, M. and Palanisamy, G. 2010. Metadata activities in biology. Journal of Library Metadata, 10: 99-118. doi:10.1080/19386389. 506389
50. Seal, R. L., Gordon, S. M., Lush, M. J., Wright, M. W. and Bruford, E. A. 2011. Genenames.org: The HGNC resources in 2011. Nucleic Acids Research, 39: D514-D519. doi:10.1093/nar/gkq892
51. Smalheiser, N. and Torvik, V. 2009. Author name disambiguation. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), 43: 1-43. doi:10.1002/ aris.2009.1440430113
52. Smith, B., Ashburner, M., Rosse, C., Bard, J., Bug, W., Ceusters, W. and Lewis, S. 2007. The OBO Foundry: Coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nature Biotechnology, 25: 1251-1255. doi:10.1038/nbt-1346
53. Stvilia, B., Gasser, L., Twidale, M. and Smith, L. C. 2007. A framework for information quality assessment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58: 1720-1733. doi:10.1002/asi.20652
54. Svenonius, E. 1986. Unanswered questions in the design of controlled vocabularies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37: 331-340.
55. Tillett, B. 2004. Authority control: State of the art and new perspectives. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 38(3-4): 23-41. doi:10.1300/J104v38n03_04
56. Turner, P., McLennan, A., Bates, A. and White, M. 2005. Molecular biology (3rd ed.), New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
57. Unified Medical Language System. 2011. Metathesaurus release statistics Retrieved from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/knowledge_sources/metathesaurus/release/statistics.html
58. UniProt Consortium. 2011. Protein naming guidelines, Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.uniprot.org/docs/nameprot
59. Wain, H. M., Bruford, E. A., Lovering, R. C., Lush, M. J., Wright, M. W. and Povey, S. 2002. Guidelines for human gene nomenclature. Genomics, 79: 464-470. doi: 10.1006/geno.2002.6748
60. Wand, Y. and Wang, R. 1996. Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations. Communications of the ACM, 39(11): 86-92.
61. Wang, R. and Strong, D. 1996. Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4): 5-35.
62. Yilmaz, P., Gilbert, J. A., Knight, R., Amaral-Zettler, L., Karsch-Mizrachi, I., Cochrane, G. and Field, D. 2011. The genomic standards consortium: Bringing standards to life for microbial ecology. The ISME Journal, 5: 1565-1567. doi:10.1038/ismej. 2011.39
63. Yilmaz, P., Kottmann, R., Field, D., Knight, R., Cole, J. R., Amaral-Zettler, L. and Glöckner, F. O. 2011. Minimum information about a marker gene sequence (MIMARKS) and minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS) specifications. Nature Biotechnology, 29: 415-420. doi:10.1038/nbt.1823