Text-mining approaches in molecular biology and biomedicine

Drug Discovery Today

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 439-445

  Krallinger, Martin ^a   Erhardt, Ramon Alonso Allende ^b   Valencia, Alfonso ^a  

^a CENTRO NACIONAL DE BIOTECNOLOGÍA   (Spain)

^b Bioalma SL   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AUTOANALYZER; AUTOMATION; BINDING AFFINITY; BIOINFORMATICS; BIOLOGY; BIOMEDICINE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CLASSIFICATION; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DNA MICROARRAY; DOCUMENTATION; EVALUATION; EXPERIMENT; GENE CLUSTER; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; LABORATORY; LITERATURE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICINE; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NONHUMAN; PATHOGENESIS; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; SCIENCE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STANDARD; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PERIODICALS; PROTEINS;

EID: 16244403024     PISSN: 13596446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1359-6446(05)03376-3     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Devos D., Valencia A. Practical limits of function prediction. Proteins. 41:2000;98-107
2. Boeckmann B., et al. The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:2003;365-370
3. Dwight S.S., et al. Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) provides secondary gene annotation using the Gene Ontology (GO). Nucleic Acids Res. 30:2002;69-72
4. Blaschke C., et al. Information extraction in molecular biology. Brief. Bioinform. 3:2002;154-165
5. Shatkay H., et al. Mining the biomedical literature in the genomic era: an overview. J. Comput. Biol. 10:2003;821-855
6. Hirschman L., et al. Accomplishments and challenges in literature data mining for biology. Bioinformatics. 18:2002;1553-1561
7. Hermjakob H., et al. IntAct: an open source molecular interaction database. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:2004;D452-D455. Database issue
8. Bader G.D., et al. BIND: the Biomolecular Interaction Network Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:2003;248-250
9. Xenarios I., et al. DIP, the Database of Interacting Proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:2002;303-305
10. Zanzoni A., et al. MINT: a Molecular INTeraction database. FEBS Lett. 513:2002;135-140
11. FlyBase Consortium. The FlyBase database of the Drosophila genome projects and community literature. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:2003;172-175
12. Blake J.A., et al. MGD: the Mouse Genome Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:2003;193-195
13. Wheeler D.L., et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:2003;28-33
14. Ashburner M., et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 25:2000;25-29
15. Camon E., et al. (2004) The Gene Ontology Annotation (GOA) Database: sharing knowledge in Uniprot with Gene Ontology. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:2004;D262-D266. Database issue
16. Wroe C.J., et al. A common drug ontology for decision support and reference. Conf. Proc. Current perspectives in healthcare computing. 2000;93-102
17. Bodenreider O. The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:2004;267-270. Database issue
18. Lindberg C. The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) of the National Library of Medicine. J. Am. Med. Rec. Assoc. 61:1990;40-42
19. Golbeck J. The National Cancer Institute's thesaurus and ontology. Journal of Web Semantics. 1:2003;75-80
20. Kim J.D., et al. GENIA corpus - semantically annotated corpus for bio-textmining. Bioinformatics. 19:2003;i180-i182
21. Kim J.D., et al. Introduction to the Biol.-entity Recognition Task of the JNLPBA workshop. Proc of the JNPBA. 2004;70-76
22. Blaschke, C. et al. Evaluation of BioCreative assessment of task 2. BMC Bioinformatics (in press)
23. Camon, E.B. et al. Evaluation of GO annotation retrieval for BioCreative, Task 2: lessons to be learned and comparison with existing annotation techniques in GOA. BMC Bioinformatics (in press)
24. Krallinger M., et al. Assessing the correlation between contextual patterns and biological entity tagging. Proc. JNLPBA. 2004;36-42
25. Fukuda K., et al. Toward information extraction: identifying protein names from biological papers. Pac Symp Biocomput. 1998:1998;705-716
26. Krauthammer M., et al. Using BLAST for identifying gene and protein names in journal articles. Gene. 259:2000;245-252
27. Tanabe L., et al. Tagging gene and protein names in biomedical text. Bioinformatics. 18:2002;1124-1132
28. Kazama, J. (2002) Tuning support vector machines for biomedical named entity recognition. Proceedings of the Natural Language Processing in the Biomedical Domain, 1-8
29. Nobata, C. et al. (1999) Automatic term identification and classification in biology texts. Proceedings of the Natural Language Pacific Rim Symposium, 369-375
30. Hatzivassiloglou V., et al. Disambiguating proteins, genes, and RNA in text: a machine learning approach. Bioinformatics. 17:(Suppl. 1):2001;S97-S106
31. Wilbur W.J., et al. Analysis of biomedical text for chemical names: a comparison of three methods. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999:1999;176-180
32. Schuler G.D., et al. Entrez: molecular biology database and retrieval system. Methods Enzymol. 266:1996;141-162
33. Wilbur W.J., Coffee L. The effectiveness of document neighboring in search enhancement. Inf. Process. Manage. 30:1994;253-266
34. Hobbs J.R. Information extraction from biomedical text. J. Biomed. Inform. 35:2002;260-264
35. Tamames J., et al. EUCLID: automatic classification of proteins in functional classes by their database annotations. Bioinformatics. 14:1998;542-543
36. Fleischmann W., et al. A novel method for automatic functional annotation of proteins. Bioinformatics. 15:1999;228-233
37. Abascal F., et al. Automatic annotation of protein function based on family identification. Proteins. 53:2003;683-692
38. Frishman D., et al. Functional and structural genomics using PEDANT. Bioinformatics. 17:2001;44-57
39. Scharf M., et al. GeneQuiz: a workbench for sequence analysis. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol. 2:1994;348-353
40. Andrade M.A., et al. Automatic extraction of keywords from scientific text: application to the knowledge domain of protein families. Bioinformatics. 14:1998;600-607
41. Raychaudhuri S., et al. Associating genes with gene ontology codes using a maximum entropy analysis of biomedical literature. Genome Res. 12:2002;203-214
42. Xie H., et al. Large-scale protein annotation through gene ontology. Genome Res. 12:2002;785-794
43. MacCallum R.M., et al. SAWTED: structure assignment with text description-enhanced detection of remote homologues with automated SWISS-PROT annotation comparisons. Bioinformatics. 16:2000;125-129
44. Nair R., Rost B. Inferring sub-cellular localization through automated lexical analysis. Bioinformatics. 18:(Suppl. 1):2002;S78-S86
45. Stapley B.J., et al. Predicting the sub-cellular location of proteins from text using support vector machines. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2002:2002;374-385
46. Oliveros J.C., et al. Expression profiles and biological function. Genome Inform Ser Workshop Genome Inform. 11:2000;106-117
47. Blaschke C., et al. Mining functional information associated with expression arrays. Funct. Integr. Genomics. 1:2001;256-268
48. Shatkay H., et al. Genes, themes and microarrays. Proc Int Conf Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. 8:2000;317-328
49. Raychaudhuri S., et al. A literature-based method for assessing the functional coherence of a gene group. Bioinformatics. 19:2003;396-401
50. Al-Shahrour F., et al. FatiGO: a web tool for finding significant associations of Gene Ontology terms with groups of genes. Bioinformatics. 20:2004;578-580
51. Jenssen T.K., et al. A literature network of human genes for high-throughput analysis of gene expression. Nat. Genet. 28:2001;21-28
52. Uetz P., et al. Protein interaction maps on the fly. Nat. Biotechnol. 22:2004;43-44
53. Valencia A., et al. Computational methods for the prediction of protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12:2002;368-373
54. Rindflesch T.C., et al. Mining molecular binding terminology from biomedical text. Proc of the AMIA Annual Symposium. 1999;127-131
55. Blaschke C., et al. Automatic extraction of biological information from scientific text: protein-protein interactions. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol. 1999:1999;60-67
56. Blaschke C., et al. The frame-based module of the Suiseki information extraction system. IEEE Intell. Syst. 17:2002;14-20
57. Blaschke C., Valencia A. The potential use of SUISEKI as a protein interaction discovery tool. Genome Inform Ser Workshop Genome Inform. 12:2001;123-134
58. Ng S.K., Wong M. Toward routine automatic pathway discovery from on-line scientific text abstracts. Genome Inform Ser Workshop Genome Inform. 10:1999;104-112
59. Ono T., et al. Automated extraction of information on protein-protein interactions from the biological literature. Bioinformatics. 17:2001;155-161
60. Hatzivassiloglou V., et al. Learning anchor verbs for biological interaction patterns from published text articles. Int. J. Med. Inf. 67:2002;19-32
61. Donaldson I., et al. PreBIND and Textomy - mining the biomedical literature for protein-protein interactions using a support vector machine. BMC Bioinformatics. 4:2003;11
62. Hoffmann R., et al. A gene network for navigating the literature. Nat. Genet. 36:2004;664
63. Swanson D.R. Fish oil, Raynaud's syndrome and undiscovered public knowledge. Perspect. Biol. Med. 30:1986;7-18
64. Smalheiser N.R., et al. Using ARROWSMITH: a computer-assisted approach to formulating and assessing scientific hypotheses. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 57:1998;149-153
65. Friedman C. A broad-coverage natural language processing system. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000;270-274
66. Friedman C., et al. GENIES: a natural-language processing system for the extraction of molecular pathways from journal articles. Bioinformatics. 17:2001;S74-S82
67. Rzhetsky A., et al. GeneWays: a system for extracting, analyzing, visualizing, and integrating molecular pathways data. J. Biomed. Inform. 37:2004;43-53
68. Rindflesch T.C., et al. EDGAR: extraction of drugs, genes and relations from the biomedical literature. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2000:2000;517-528
69. Hersh, W. (2003) TREC GENOMICS track overview. Proc. Twelfth Text Retrieval Conference, 14-24
70. Yeh A.S., et al. Evaluation of text data mining for database curation: lessons learned from the KDD Challenge Cup. Bioinformatics. 19:(Suppl. 1):2003;331-339
71. Hirschman, L. et al. Overview of BioCreAtIvE task 1B: normalized gene lists. BMC bioinformatics (in press)