Pulmonary nodule size evaluation with chest tomosynthesis

Radiology

Volumn 265, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 273-282

  Johnsson, Åse A ^a,b   Fagman, Erika ^a,b   Vikgren, Jenny ^a,b   Fisichella, Valeria A ^a,b   Boijsen, Marianne ^a,b   Flinck, Agneta ^a,b   Kheddache, Susanne ^a,b   Svalkvist, Angelica ^a,b   Båth, Magnus ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; CHEST TOMOSYNTHESIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIMITS OF AGREEMENT; LUNG NODULE; LUNG NODULE SIZE; MALE; MEASUREMENT; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; SOLITARY PULMONARY NODULE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84866634996     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12111459     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009;45(2):228-247.
2. MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, et al. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2005;237(2):395-400. (Pubitemid 41507873)
3. Dobbins JT 3rd, McAdams HP, Song JW, et al. Digital tomosynthesis of the chest for lung nodule detection: interim sensitivity results from an ongoing NIH-sponsored trial. Med Phys 2008;35(6):2554-2557. (Pubitemid 351748662)
4. Vikgren J, Zachrisson S, Svalkvist A, et al. Comparison of chest tomosynthesis and chest radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: human observer study of clinical cases. Radiology 2008;249(3):1034-1041.
5. Dobbins JT 3rd, McAdams HP. Chest tomosynthesis: technical principles and clinical update. Eur J Radiol 2009;72(2):244-251.
6. Johnsson ÅA, Svalkvist A, Vikgren J, et al. A phantom study of nodule size evaluation with chest tomosynthesis and computed tomography. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2010;139(1-3):140-143.
7. Båth M, Svalkvist A, von Wrangel A, Rismyhr-Olsson H, Cederblad Å. Effective dose to patients from chest examinations with tomosynthesis. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2010;139(1-3):153-158.
8. Börjesson S, Håkansson M, Båth M, et al. A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005;114(1-3):45-52. (Pubitemid 40883653)
9. Håkansson M, Svensson S, Zachrisson S, Svalkvist A, Båth M, Månsson LG. View-DEX: an efficient and easy-to-use software for observer performance studies. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2010;139(1-3):42-51.
10. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1(8476):307-310. (Pubitemid 16134762)
11. Revel MP, Bissery A, Bienvenu M, Aycard L, Lefort C, Frija G. Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable? Radiology 2004;231(2):453-458. (Pubitemid 38552904)
12. Bogot NR, Kazerooni EA, Kelly AM, Quint LE, Desjardins B, Nan B. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the assessment of pulmonary nodule size on CT using film and computer display methods. Acad Radiol 2005;12(8):948-956. (Pubitemid 41116411)
13. Marten K, Auer F, Schmidt S, Kohl G, Rummeny EJ, Engelke C. Inadequacy of manual measurements compared to automated CT volumetry in assessment of treatment response of pulmonary metastases using RECIST criteria. Eur Radiol 2006;16(4):781-790. (Pubitemid 43380236)
14. Gavrielides MA, Kinnard LM, Myers KJ, Petrick N. Noncalcified lung nodules: volumetric assessment with thoracic CT. Radiology 2009;251(1):26-37.
15. Ashraf H, de Hoop B, Shaker SB, et al. Lung nodule volumetry: segmentation algorithms within the same software package cannot be used interchangeably. Eur Radiol 2010;20(8):1878-1885.
16. Ravenel JG, Leue WM, Nietert PJ, Miller JV, Taylor KK, Silvestri GA. Pulmonary nodule volume: effects of reconstruction parameters on automated measurements - a phantom study. Radiology 2008;247(2):400-408.
17. Pauls S, Kürschner C, Dharaiya E, et al. Comparison of manual and automated size measurements of lung metastases on MDCT images: relevant influence on therapeutic decisions. Eur J Radiol 2008;66(1):19-26. (Pubitemid 351434531)
18. Christe A, Torrente JC, Lin M, et al. CT screening and follow-up of lung nodules: effects of tube current-time setting and nodule size and density on detectability and of tube current-time setting on apparent size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197(3):623-630.
19. Svahn T, Ruschin M, Hemdal B, et al. Inplane artifacts in breast tomosynthesis quantified with a novel contrast-detail phantom. Proc SPIE 2007;6510:65104R.
20. Erasmus JJ, Gladish GW, Broemeling L, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: implications for assessment of tumor response. J Clin Oncol 2003;21(13):2574-2582. (Pubitemid 46606340)