Revision for unexplained pain following unicompartmental and total knee replacement

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 94, Issue 17, 2012, Pages e126(1)-

  Baker, Paul N ^a   Petheram, Timothy ^b   Avery, Peter J ^c   Gregg, Paul J ^d   Deehan, David J ^e  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b WANSBECK GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e ROYAL VICTORIA INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE REGISTRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOINT STIFFNESS; KNEE ARTHRITIS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE FRACTURE; KNEE INSTABILITY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RELIABILITY; REOPERATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;

EID: 84866613839     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: 15351386     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00791     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. 7th Annual Report 2010. www.njrcentre.org.uk/NjrCentre/Portals/0/NJR 7th Annual Report 2010.pdf. Accessed 2011 Jun 1.
2. Lidgren L, Robertsson O, W-Dahl A. Annual Report 2009. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. http://www.knee.nko.se/english/online/uploadedFiles/113- SVK2009ENGL1.0.pdf. Accessed 2011 Jun 1.
3. Rolfson O, Kärrholm J, Dahlberg LE, Garellick G. Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: results of a nationwide prospective observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Jul;93(7):867-75.
4. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998 Nov;80(6):983-9. (Pubitemid 28528399)
5. Svärd UC, Price AJ. Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001 Mar;83(2):191-4. (Pubitemid 32242013)
6. Keys GW, Ul-Abiddin Z, Toh EM. Analysis of first forty Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement from a small district hospital in UK. Knee. 2004 Oct;11(5):375-7. (Pubitemid 39194790)
7. Rajasekhar C, Das S, Smith A. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. 2- to 12-year results in a community hospital. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Sep;86(7):983-5.
8. Newman J, Pydisetty RV, Ackroyd C. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the 15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Jan;91(1):52-7.
9. Willis-Owen CA, Brust K, Alsop H, Miraldo M, Cobb JP. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty in the UK National Health Service: an analysis of candidacy, outcome and cost efficacy. Knee. 2009 Dec;16(6):473-8. Epub 2009 May 22.
10. Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ, Murray DW. A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Dec;92(12):1628-31.
11. Cobb J. Letter regarding Joint Registries (J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010; 92[6]: 749-50). 2010 Jul 30. http://www.jbjs.boneandjoint.org.uk/letters/? firstindex=121&hits=60. Accessed 2012 Apr 24.
12. New Zealand Orthopaedic Association. The New Zealand Joint Registry. Eleven year report: January 1999 - December 2009. http://www.cdhb.govt.nz/njr/ reports/A2D65CA3.pdf. Accessed 2011 Jun 1.
13. Pearse AJ, Hooper GJ, Rothwell A, Frampton C. Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement: the New Zealand National Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Apr;92(4):508-12.
14. Dudley TE, Gioe TJ, Sinner P, Mehle S. Registry outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Jul;466(7):1666-70. Epub 2008 May 9.
15. NJR. The NJR Data Collection form K2. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/ njrcentre/Healthcareproviders/Collectingdata/Datacollectionforms/tabid/103/ Default.aspx. Accessed 2011 Jun 1.
16. AOA. Annual report 2009. Hip and knee Arthroplasty September 1999 to December 2008. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. 2009. http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr/documents/aoanjrrreport- 2009.pdf Accessed 2011 Jun 1.
17. American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA Physical status classification system. http://www.asahq.org/clinical/physicalstatus.htm. Accessed 2012 Feb 15.
18. Gioe TJ, Killeen KK, Hoeffel DP, Bert JM, Comfort TK, Scheltema K, Mehle S, Grimm K. Analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in a community-based implant registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Nov;(416):111-9. (Pubitemid 37413628)
19. Furnes O, Espehaug B, Lie SA, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI. Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Mar;89(3):519-25. (Pubitemid 46371267)
20. Loughead JM, Malhan K, Mitchell SY, Pinder IM, McCaskie AW, Deehan DJ, Lingard EA. Outcome following knee arthroplasty beyond 15 years. Knee. 2008 Mar;15(2):85-90. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
21. Wylde V, Blom AW. The failure of survivorship. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 May;93(5):569-70.
22. Horan FT. Joint registries. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Jun;92(6):749-50.