The index of microvascular resistance identifies patients with periprocedural myocardial infarction in elective percutaneous coronary intervention

Heart

Volumn 98, Issue 20, 2012, Pages 1492-1497

  Layland, Jamie J ^a,b   Whitbourn, Robert J ^a,b   Burns, Andrew T ^a,b   Somaratne, Jithendra ^a   Leitl, Georg ^a   MacIsaac, Andrew I ^a,b   Wilson, Andrew ^a,b  

^a ST VINCENT S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CREATINE KINASE; TROPONIN I;

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY FLOW RESERVE; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; GUIDE WIRE; HEART INFARCTION; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INDEX OF MICROVASCULAR RESISTANCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICROVASCULARIZATION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PERIPROCEDURAL HEART INFARCTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRESSURE WIRE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; STABLE ANGINA PECTORIS;

ANGINA, STABLE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MICROCIRCULATION; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ELECTIVE; VASCULAR RESISTANCE;

EID: 84866603739     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: 1468201X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302252     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Cook S, Walker A, Hugli O, et al. Percutaneous coronary interventions in Europe: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections based on data up to 2004. Clin Res Cardiol 2007;96:375-82.
2. Prasad A, Singh M, Lerman A, et al. Isolated elevation in troponin T after percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with higher long-term mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1765-70.
3. Lansky AJ, Stone GW. Periprocedural myocardial infarction: prevalence, prognosis, and prevention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:602-10.
4. Fuchs S, Kornowski R, Mehran R, et al. Prognostic value of cardiac troponin-I levels following catheter-based coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol 2000;85:1077-82.
5. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, et al. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 2007;116:2634-53.
6. Cuculi F, Lim CC, Banning AP. Periprocedural myocardial injury during elective percutaneous coronary intervention: is it important and how can it be prevented? Heart 2010;96:736-40.
7. Herrmann J. Peri-procedural myocardial injury: 2005 update. Eur Heart J 2005;26:2493-519.
8. Prasad A, Herrmann J. Myocardial infarction due to percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2011;364:453-64.
9. Gibson CM, Kirtane AJ, Morrow DA, et al. Association between thrombolysis in myocardial infarction myocardial perfusion grade, biomarkers, and clinical outcomes among patients with moderate- to high-risk acute coronary syndromes: observations from the randomized trial to evaluate the relative PROTECTion against post-PCI microvascular dysfunction and post-PCI ischemia among antiplatelet and antithrombotic agents-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 30 (PROTECT-TIMI 30). Am Heart J 2006;152:756-61.
10. Fearon WF, Balsam LB, Farouque HM, et al. Novel index for invasively assessing the coronary microcirculation. Circulation 2003;107:3129-32.
11. Fearon WF, Aarnoudse W, Pijls NH, et al. Microvascular resistance is not influenced by epicardial coronary artery stenosis severity: experimental validation. Circulation 2004;109:2269-72.
12. McGeoch R, Watkins S, Berry C, et al. The index of microcirculatory resistance measured acutely predicts the extent and severity of myocardial infarction in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:715-22.
13. Cuisset T, Hamilos M, Melikian N, et al. Direct stenting for stable angina pectoris is associated with reduced periprocedural microcirculatory injury compared with stenting after pre-dilation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1060-5.
14. Aarnoudse W, Fearon WF, Manoharan G, et al. Epicardial stenosis severity does not affect minimal microcirculatory resistance. Circulation 2004;110:2137-42.
15. Meier B, Luethy P, Finci L, et al. Coronary wedge pressure in relation to spontaneously visible and recruitable collaterals. Circulation 1987;75:906-13.
16. Layland J, MacIsaac AI, Burns AT, et al. When collateral supply is accounted for epicardial stenosis does not increase microvascular resistance. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2012;5:97-102.
17. Ricciardi MJ, Wu E, Davidson CJ, et al. Visualization of discrete microinfarction after percutaneous coronary intervention associated with mild creatine kinase-MB elevation. Circulation 2001;103:2780-3.
18. Selvanayagam JB, Porto I, Channon K, et al. Troponin elevation after percutaneous coronary intervention directly represents the extent of irreversible myocardial injury: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2005;111:1027-32.
19. Babu GG, Walker JM, Yellon DM, et al. Peri-procedural myocardial injury during percutaneous coronary intervention: an important target for cardioprotection. Eur Heart J 2011;32:23-31.
20. Porto I, Selvanayagam JB, Van Gaal WJ, et al. Plaque volume and occurrence and location of periprocedural myocardial necrosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction myocardial perfusion grade analysis, and intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 2006;114:662-9.
21. Bahrmann P, Werner GS, Heusch G, et al. Detection of coronary microembolization by Doppler ultrasound in patients with stable angina pectoris undergoing elective percutaneous coronary interventions. Circulation 2007;115:600-8.
22. Gregorini L, Fajadet J, Robert G, et al. Coronary vasoconstriction after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty is attenuated by antiadrenergic agents. Circulation 1994;90:895-907.
23. Bahrmann P, Figulla HR, Wagner M, et al. Detection of coronary microembolisation by Doppler ultrasound during percutaneous coronary interventions. Heart 2005;91:1186-92.
24. Fearon WF, Shah M, Ng M, et al. Predictive value of the index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:560-5.
25. Lim HS, Yoon MH, Tahk SJ, et al. Usefulness of the index of microcirculatory resistance for invasively assessing myocardial viability immediately after primary angioplasty for anterior myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2009;30:2854-60.
26. Melikian N, Vercauteren S, Fearon WF, et al. Quantitative assessment of coronary microvascular function in patients with and without epicardial atherosclerosis. EuroIntervention 2010;5:939-45.
27. Verhoeff BJ, Siebes M, Meuwissen M, et al. Influence of percutaneous coronary intervention on coronary microvascular resistance index. Circulation 2005;111:76-82.
28. Chamuleau SA, Siebes M, Meuwissen M, et al. Association between coronary lesion severity and distal microvascular resistance in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2003;285:H2194-200.
29. Gibson CM, Morrow DA, Murphy SA, et al. A randomized trial to evaluate the relative protection against post-percutaneous coronary intervention microvascular dysfunction, ischemia, and inflammation among antiplatelet and antithrombotic agents: the PROTECT-TIMI-30 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:2364-73.