When collateral supply is accounted for epicardial stenosis does not increase microvascular resistance

Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 97-102

  Layland, Jamie ^a,b   MacIsaac, Andrew I ^a,b   Burns, Andrew T ^a,b   Somaratne, Jithendra B ^a,b   Leitl, George ^a   Whitbourn, Robert J ^a,b   Wilson, Andrew M ^b  

^a ST VINCENT S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Epicardial stenosis; FFR; Microcirculation; PCI

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COLLATERAL CIRCULATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; EPICARDIAL STENOSIS; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HEART DISEASE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VASCULAR RESISTANCE;

ANGIOPLASTY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; COLLATERAL CIRCULATION; CORONARY STENOSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERICARDIUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; VASCULAR RESISTANCE;

EID: 84860870958     PISSN: 19417640     EISSN: 19417632     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.964718     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Knaapen P, Camici PG, Marques KM, Nijveldt R, Bax JJ, Westerhof N, Gotte MJ, Jerosch-Herold M, Schelbert HR, Lammertsma AA, van Rossum AC. Coronary microvascular resistance: methods for its quantification in humans. Basic Res Cardiol. 2009;104:485-498.
2. Fearon WF, Balsam LB, Farouque HM, Caffarelli AD, Robbins RC, Fitzgerald PJ, Yock PG, Yeung AC. Novel index for invasively assessing the coronary microcirculation. Circulation. 2003;107:3129-3132. (Pubitemid 36793080)
3. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van't Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, Mac-Carthy PA, Fearon WF. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009;360: 213-224.
4. Aarnoudse W, Fearon WF, Manoharan G, Geven M, van de Vosse F, Rutten M, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH. Epicardial stenosis severity does not affect minimal microcirculatory resistance. Circulation. 2004;110: 2137-2142. (Pubitemid 39372491)
5. Verhoeff BJ, Siebes M, Meuwissen M, Atasever B, Voskuil M, de Winter RJ, Koch KT, Tijssen JG, Spaan JA, Piek JJ. Influence of percutaneous coronary intervention on coronary microvascular resistance index. Circulation. 2005;111:76-82. (Pubitemid 40070847)
6. Chilian WM, Layne SM. Coronary microvascular responses to reductions in perfusion pressure. Evidence for persistent arteriolar vasomotor tone during coronary hypoperfusion. Circ Res. 1990;66:1227-1238. (Pubitemid 20147740)
7. Spaan JA, Piek JJ, Hoffman JI, Siebes M. Physiological basis of clinically used coronary hemodynamic indices. Circulation. 2006;113(3):446-455. (Pubitemid 43803207)
8. Kanatsuka H, Lamping KG, Eastham CL, Marcus ML. Heterogeneous changes in epimyocardial microvascular size during graded coronary stenosis. Evidence of the microvascular site for autoregulation. Circ Res. 1990;66:389-396. (Pubitemid 20041170)
9. Marcus ML, Chilian WM, Kanatsuka H, Dellsperger KC, Eastham CL, Lamping KG. Understanding the coronary circulation through studies at the microvascular level. Circulation. 1990;82:1-7. (Pubitemid 20216309)
10. Messina LM, Hanley FL, Uhlig PN, Baer RW, Grattan MT, Hoffman JI. Effects of pressure gradients between branches of the left coronary artery on the pressure axis intercept and the shape of steady state circumflex pressure-flow relations in dogs. Circ Res. 1985;56:11-19. (Pubitemid 15130236)
11. Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, De Bruyne B, Gould KL. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1993;87:1354-1367. (Pubitemid 23110406)
12. Melikian N, Vercauteren S, Fearon WF, Cuisset T, MacCarthy PA, Davidavicius G, Aarnoudse W, Bartunek J, Vanderheyden M, Wyffels E, Wijns W, Heyndrickx GR, Pijls NH, de Bruyne B. Quantitative assessment of coronary microvascular function in patients with and without epicardial atherosclerosis. EuroIntervention. 2010;5:939-945.
13. Lim CC, van Gaal WJ, Testa L, Cuculi F, Arnold JR, Karamitsos T, Francis JM, Petersen SE, Digby JE, Westaby S, Antoniades C, Kharbanda RK, Burrell LM, Neubauer S, Banning AP. With the "universal definition," measurement of creatine kinase-myocardial band rather than troponin allows more accurate diagnosis of periprocedural necrosis and infarction after coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57: 653-661.
14. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Smith L, Wievegg M, Heyndrickx GR. Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: experimental validation. Circulation. 2001;104:2003-2006. (Pubitemid 33027037)
15. Meier B, Luethy P, Finci L, Steffenino GD, Rutishauser W. Coronary wedge pressure in relation to spontaneously visible and recruitable collaterals. Circulation. 1987;75:906-913. (Pubitemid 17068519)
16. Cuisset T, Hamilos M, Melikian N, Wyffels E, Sarma J, Sarno G, Barbato E, Bartunek J, Wijns W, De Bruyne B. Direct stenting for stable angina pectoris is associated with reduced periprocedural microcirculatory injury compared with stenting after pre-dilation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51: 1060-1065. (Pubitemid 351374771)
17. Sambuceti G, Marzilli M, Fedele S, Marini C, L'Abbate A. Paradoxical increase in microvascular resistance during tachycardia downstream from a severe stenosis in patients with coronary artery disease: reversal by angioplasty. Circulation. 2001;103:2352-2360. (Pubitemid 32448799)
18. Chamuleau SA, Siebes M, Meuwissen M, Koch KT, Spaan JA, Piek JJ. Association between coronary lesion severity and distal microvascular resistance in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;285:H2194-H2200. (Pubitemid 37305965)
19. Fearon WF, Aarnoudse W, Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Balsam LB, Cooke DT, Robbins RC, Fitzgerald PJ, Yeung AC, Yock PG. Microvascular resistance is not influenced by epicardial coronary artery stenosis severity: experimental validation. Circulation. 2004;109:2269-2272. (Pubitemid 38656865)
20. Gould KL, Lipscomb K, Hamilton GW. Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis. Instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. Am J Cardiol. 1974;33:87-94.
21. Uren NG, Melin JA, De Bruyne B, Wijns W, Baudhuin T, Camici PG. Relation between myocardial blood flow and the severity of coronaryartery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1782-1788.
22. Layland J, Wilson A, Whitbourn R, Macisaac A. Letter by Layland et al regarding article, "Validation of intravascular ultrasound-derived parameters with fractional flow reserve for assessment of coronary stenosis severity." Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:e16.
23. Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN, Maccarthy PA, Van't Veer M, Pijls NH. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2816-2821.
24. Testa L, Van Gaal WJ, Biondi Zoccai GG, Agostoni P, Latini RA, Bedogni F, Porto I, Banning AP. Myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of troponin elevation applying the new universal definition. QJM. 2009;102:369-378.