Can T 1-rho MRI detect acetabular cartilage degeneration in femoroacetabular impingement? A pilot study

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 94 B, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1187-1192

  Rakhra, K S ^a   Lattanzio, P J ^a   Cardenas Blanco A ^a   Cameron, I G ^a   Beaule P E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; CARTILAGE DEGENERATION; CARTILAGE INJURY; CARTILAGE THICKNESS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT; HUMAN; HYALINE CARTILAGE; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELAXATION TIME; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; THICKNESS; CHONDROPATHY; HIP; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ACETABULUM; ADULT; CARTILAGE DISEASES; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; FEMALE; FEMORACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84866509705     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B9.29981     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Mamisch T. Magnetic resonance imaging of the hip at 3 Tesla: clinical value in femoroacetabular impingement of the hip and current concepts. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2008;12:212-222.
2. Cunningham T, Jessel R, Zurakowski D, Millis MB, Kim YJ. Delayed gadolineum-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage to predict early failure of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2006;88-A:1540-1548.
3. Dijkgraaf LC. The structure, biochemistry, and metabolism of osteoarthritic cartilage: a review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:1182-1192.
4. Poole AR. An introduction to the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis. Front Biosci 1999;4:D662-D670.
5. Akella SV, Regatte RR, Gougoutas AJ, et al. Proteoglycan-induced changes in T1rho-relaxation of articular cartilage at 4T. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:419-423.
6. Duvvuri U, Goldberg AD, Kranz JK, et al. Water magnetic relaxation dispersion in biological systems: the contribution of proton exchange and implications for the non-invasive detection of cartilage degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:12479-12484.
7. Wheaton AJ, Dodge GR, Elliott DM, Nicoll SB, Reddy R. Quantification of cartilage biomechanical and biochemical properties via T1p magnentic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:1087-1093.
8. Duvvuri U, Kudchodkar S, Reddy R, Leigh JS. T(1rho) relaxation can assess longitudinal proteoglycan loss from articular cartilage in vitro. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002;10:838-844.
9. Li X, Pai A, Blimenkrantz G, Carballido-Gamino J, et al. Spatial distribution and relationship of T1rho and T2 relaxation times in knee cartilage with osteoarthritis. Magn Reson Med 2009;61:1310-1318.
10. Regatte RR, Akella SV, Wheaton AJ, et al. T 1 rho-relaxation mapping of human femoral-tibial cartilage in vivo. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:336-341.
11. Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:1012-1018.
12. Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, et al. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;417:112-120.
13. Beaulé PE, Zaragoza E, Motamedi K, Copelan N, Dorey FJ. Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res 2005;23:1286-1292.
14. James SL, Ali K, Malara F, et al. MRI findings of femoroacetabular impingement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:1412-1419.
15. Kassarjian A, Yoon LS, Belzile E, et al. Triad of MR arthrographic findings in patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Radiology 2005;236:588-592.
16. Werlen S, Leunig M, Ganz R. Magnetic resonance arthrography of the hip in femoroacetabular impingement. Oper Tech Orthop 2005;15:191-203.
17. Beaulé PE, Zaragoza E, Copelan N. Magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium arthrography to assess acetabular cartilage delamination: a report of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:2294-2298.
18. Tiderius CJ, Jessel R, Kim YJ, Burstein D. Hip dGEMRIC in asymptomatic volunteers and patients with early osteoarthritis: the influence of timing after contrast injection. Magn Reson Med 2007;57:803-805.
19. Jessel RH, Zilkens C, Tiderius C, et al. Assessment of osteoarthritis in hips with femoroacetabular impingement using delayed gadolinium enhanced MRI of cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;30:1110-1115.
20. Bittersohl B, Steppacher S, Haamberg T, et al. Cartilage damage in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI): preliminary results on comparison of standard diagnostic vs delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC). Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009;17:1297-1306.
21. Pollard TC, McNally EG, Wilson DC, et al. Localized cartilage assessment with three-dimensional dGEMRIC in asymptomatic hips with normal morphology and cam deformity. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2010;92-A:2557-2569.
22. Nötzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, et al. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2002;84-B:556-560.
23. Meyer DC, Beck M, Ellis T, Ganz R, Leunig M. Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/asphericity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;445:181-185.
24. Busse J, Gasteiger W, Tönnis D. Significance of the "summarized hip factor" in the diagnosis and prognosis deformed hip joints. Arch Orthop Unfallchir 1972;72:245-252 (in German).
25. Marquart DW. An algorithm for least-squares estimation of non-linear parameters. J Soc Ind Appl Math 1963;11:431-441.
26. Dardzinski BJ, Mosher TJ, Li S, Van Slyke MA, Smith MB. Spatial variation of T2 in human articular cartilage. Radiology 1997;205:546-550.
27. Wyler A. Comparison of MR-arthrography and CT-arthrography in hyaline cartilage-thickness measurement in radiographically normal cadaver hips with anatomy as gold standard. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009;17:19-25.
28. Cárdenas-Blanco A, Tejos C, Irarrazaval P, Cameron I. Noise in magnitude magnetic resonance images. Concepts Magn Reson A 2008;32A:409-416.
29. Beck M, Leunig M, Parvizi J, et al. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part II. Midterm results of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;418:67-73.
30. Gray ML, Burstein D, Kim YJ, Maroudas A. 2007 Elizabeth Winston Lanier Award Winner: magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage glycosaminoglycan: basic principles, imaging technique, and clinical applications. J Orthop Res 2008;26:281-291.
31. Watanabe A. T2 mapping of hip articular cartilage in healthy volunteers at 3T: a study of topographic variation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:165-171.
32. Carballido-Gamio J, Link TM, Li X, et al. Feasibility and reproducibility of relaxometry, morphometric, and geometrical measurements of the hip joint with magnetic resonance imaging at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:227-235.
33. Cavalcanti CF, Vieira R, Kubilay S, Schweitzer M, Regatte R. 3D-T1-rhoweighted MRI of the hip joint at 3T. Procs 14th Scientific Meeting International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Seattle 2006.
34. Blumenkrantz G, Majumdar S. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis. Eur Cell Mater 2007;13:76-86.
35. Regatte RR, Akella SV, Lonner JH, Kneeland JB, Reddy R. T1rho relaxation mapping in human osteoarthritis (OA) cartilage: comparison of T1rho with T2. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;23:547-553.
36. Akella SV, Regatte RR, Wheaton AJ, Borthakur A, Reddy R. Reduction of residual dipolar interaction in cartilage by spin-lock technique. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:1103-1109.