Reason for revision influences early patient outcomes after aseptic knee revision knee

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 470, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 2244-2252

  Baker, Paul ^a   Cowling, Paul ^b   Kurtz, Steven ^c   Jameson, Simon ^b   Gregg, Paul ^b   Deehan, David ^d  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d ROYAL VICTORIA INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; EUROQOL 5D; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL CONDITION; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; KNEE FUNCTION; LYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OXFORD KNEE SCORE; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIMARY TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVISION TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; RIGIDITY; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; DISABILITY; HEALTH SURVEY; HOSPITALIZATION; INFECTION; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; PAIN; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; QUALITY OF LIFE; REOPERATION; STATISTICS;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS; QUALITY OF LIFE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 84866462762     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2278-7     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Australian Orthopaedic Association. The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Annual report 2009: Hip and knee Arthroplasty September 1998 to December 2008. Available at: http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr/documents/aoanjrrreport-2009.pdf. Accessed December 15, 2011.
2. Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:893-900.
3. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833-1840.
4. Bertin KC, Freeman MAR, Samuelson KM, Ratcliffe SS, Todd RC. Stemmed revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67:242-248.
5. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:57-63.
6. Crowninshield RD, Rosenberg AG, Sporer SM. Changing demographics of patients with total joint replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;443:266-272.
7. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:63-69.
8. Deehan D, Murray JD, Birdsall PD, Pinder IM. Quality of life after knee revision arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:761-766.
9. Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L, Lidgren L. Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty: results of a survey of 3600 patients from the Swedish knee Arthroplasty Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:339-344.
10. EuroQol Group. EQ-5D: a standardised instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. Available at: http://www.euroqol.org/home.html. Accessed June 8, 2011.
11. Fieller EC. Some problems in interval estimation. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 1954:16:2:175-185.
12. Ghomrawi HM, Kane RL, Eberly LE, Bershadsky B. Patterns of functional improvement after revision knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2838-2845.
13. Gooding CR, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Greidanus NV, Garbuz DS. Durable infection control and function with the PROSTALAC spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:985-993.
14. Greidanus NV, Peterson RC, Masri BA, Garbuz DS. Quality of life outcomes in revision versus primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26;615-620.
15. Hanssen AD, Rand JA. A comparison of primary and revision total knee arthroplasty using the kinematic stabilizer prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:491-499.
16. Hartley RC, Barton-Hanson NG, Finley R, Parkinson RW. Early patient outcomes after primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84: 994-999.
17. Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P, Paul J, Dittus R, Croxford R, Katz B, Bombardier C, Heck D, Freund D. Health related quality of life after knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:163-173.
18. Hossein F, Patel S, Haddad FS. Midterm assessment of causes and results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:1221-1228.
19. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:13-14.
20. KAT Trial Group, Johnston L, MacLennan G, McCormack K, Ramsay C, Walker A. The Knee Arthroplasty Trial (KAT) design features, baseline characteristics, and two-year functional outcomes after alternative approaches to knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:134-141.
21. Katz JN, Mahomed NN, Baron JA, Barrett JJ, Fossel AH, Creel AH, Wright J, Wright EA, Losing E. Association of hospital and surgeon procedure volume with patient-centered outcomes of total knee replacement in a population-based cohort of patients age 65 years and older. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:568-574.
22. Kim J, Nelson CL, Lotke PA. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1479-1484.
23. Malviya A, Bettinson K, Kurtz SM, Deehan DJ. When do patient-reported assessments peak after revision knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Nov 5. [Epub ahead of print].
24. March LM, Barcenilla AL, Cross MJ, Lapsley HM, Parker D, Brooks PM. Costs and outcomes of total hip and total knee joint replacement for rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2008;27:1235-1242.
25. th Annual Report 2010.Available at: http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/AbouttheNJR/ Publicationsandreports/Annualreports/Archivedannualreports/tabid/87/Default. aspx. Accessed December 15, 2011.
26. Nilsdotter AK, Toksvig-Larsen S, Roos EM. A 5 year prospective study of patient-relevant outcomes after total knee replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009;17:601-606.
27. Pearse AJ, Hooper GJ, Rothwell A, Frampton C. Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement: the New Zealand National Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:508-512.
28. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Patients satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:262-267.
29. Saleh KJ, Dykes DC, Tweedie RL, Mohamed K, Ravichandran A, Saleh RM, Gioe TJ, Heck DA. Functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty revision: a meta- analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:967-977.
30. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2008.
31. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item Short Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220-233.
32. Woolhead GM, Donovan JL, Dieppe PA. Outcomes of total knee replacement: a qualitative study. Rheumatology. 2005;44:1032-1037.
33. Wright J, Sledge CB, Poss R, Ewald FC, Walsh ME, Lingard EA. Patient-reported outcome and survivorship after kinemax total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86;2464-2470.
34. Wylde V, Learmonth I, Potter A, Bettinson K, Lingard E. Patient-reported outcomes after fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1172-1179.