Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models: Problems and solutions

Organizational Research Methods

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 695-719

  Zhang, Zhen ^a   Zyphur, Michael J ^b   Preacher, Kristopher J ^c  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON BOTHELL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Hierarchical linear models; Mediation; Multilevel; Random coefficient regression

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350076901     PISSN: 10944281     EISSN: 15527425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1094428108327450     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
2. Bauer, D.J., Preacher, K.J., & Gil, K.M. (2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 11, 142-163.
3. Busing, F. (1993). Distribution characteristics of variance estimates in two-level models. Unpublished manuscript.
4. Chen, G., & Bliese, P.D. (2002). The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self- and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 549-556.
5. Chen, G., Kirkman, B.L., Kanfer, R., Allen, D., & Rosen, B. (2007). A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 331-346.
6. Cheung, G.W., & Lau, R.S. (2008). Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: Bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 296-325.
7. nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Dansereau, F., Alutto, J.A., & Yammarino, F.J. (1984). Theory testing in organizational behavior: The variant approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Davis, J.A., Spaeth, J.L., & Huson, C. (1961). A technique for analyzing the effects of group composition. American Sociological Review, 26, 215-225.
10. Edwards, J.R., & Lambert, L.S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1-22.
11. Freedman, L.S., & Schatzkin, A. (1992). Sample size for studying intermediate endpoints within intervention trials of observational studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 136, 1148-1159.
12. Hofmann, D.A., & Gavin, M.B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24, 623-641.
13. Hofmann, D.A., Griffin, M.A., & Gavin, M.B. (2000). The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 467-511). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14. Kenny, D.A., Korchmaros, J.D., & Bolger, N. (2003). Lower level mediation in multilevel models. Psychological Methods, 8, 115-128.
15. Klein, K.J., & Kozlowski, S.W.J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 211-236.
16. Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Krull, J.L., & MacKinnon, D.P. (1999). Multilevel mediation modeling in group based intervention studies. Evaluation Review, 33, 418-444.
18. Krull, J.L., & MacKinnon, D.P. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 249-277.
19. MacKinnon, D.P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Taylor & Francis.
20. MacKinnon, D.P., Krull, J.L., & Lockwood, C.M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173-181.
21. MacKinnon, D.P., Lockwood, C.M., Hoffman, J.M., West, S.G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test the significance of the mediated effect. Psychological Methods, 7, 83-104.
22. MacKinnon, D.P., Lockwood, C.M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99-128.
23. MacKinnon, D.P., Warsi, G., & Dwyer, J.H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 41-62.
24. Mathieu, J.E., DeShon, R.P., & Bergh, D.D. (2008). Mediational inferences in organizational research: Then, now and beyond. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 203-223.
25. Mathieu, J.E., & Taylor, S.R. (2007). A framework for testing meso-mediational relationships in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 141-172.
26. Muller, D., Yzerbyt, V.Y., & Judd, C.M. (2008). Adjusting for a mediator in models with two crossed treatment variables. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 224-240.
27. Ostroff, C. (1993). Comparing correlations based on individual level and aggregate data. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 569-582.
28. Pituch, K.A., & Stapleton, L.M. (2008). The performance of methods to test upper-level mediation in the presence of nonnormal data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 43, 237-267.
29. Pituch, K.A., Tate, R.L., & Murphy, D.L. (in press). Three-level models for indirect effects in school- and class-randomized experiments in education. Journal of Experimental Education.
30. Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Seibert, S.E., Silver, S.R., & Randolph, W.A. (2004). Taking empowerment to the next level: A multiple-level model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 332-349.
32. Snijders, T.A., & Bosker, R.J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Sobel, M.E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural models. In S. Leinhardt (ed.), Sociological Methodology 1982 (pp. 290-312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
34. Stone-Romero, E.F., & Rosopa, P.J. (2008). The relative validity of inferences about mediation as a function of research design characteristics. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 326-352.
35. Taylor, A.B., MacKinnon, D.P., & Tein, J.Y. (2008). Tests of the three-path mediated effect. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 241-269.