Integrating the results of user research into medical device development: Insights from a case study

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Martin, Jennifer L ^a   Barnett, Julie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Medical device; Product development; User centred design

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSUMER; DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; NEEDS ASSESSMENT;

CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; NEEDS ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84866434035     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-74     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Patient safety, systems design and ergonomics. Buckle P, Clarkson PJ, Coleman R, Ward J, Anderson J, App Ergon 2006 37 491 500 10.1016/j.apergo.2006. 04.016
2. Medical device development: The challenge for ergonomics. Martin JL, Norris BJ, Murphy E, Crowe JA, App Ergon 2006 39 271 283
3. Benefits of, and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation. Shah SGS, Robinson I, Int J Technol Assess 2007 23 131 137
4. A model of user engagement in medical device development. Grocott P, Weir H, Ram MB, Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2007 20 484 493 10.1108/ 09526860710819422 18030966
5. Error in Medicine. Leape LL, JAMA 2004 272 1851 1857
6. Human factors engineering and patient safety. Gosbee J, Qual Saf Health Care 2002 11 352 354 10.1136/qhc.11.4.352 12468696
7. Public and user involvement in the UK national health service. Harrison S, Dowswell G, Milewa T, Health Soc Care Comm 2002 10 63 66 10.1046/j.1365-2524. 2002.00342.x
8. Capturing user requirements in medical device development: the role of ergonomics. Martin JL, Murphy E, Crowe JA, Norris BJ, Phys Meas 2006 27 49 62 10.1088/0967-3334/27/8/R01
9. International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 62366: Medical devices-Application of usability engineering to medical devices International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva 2007
10. American National Standards Institute, ANSI HE75: Human factors Human factors engineeringDesign of medical devices American National Standards Institute, Washington DC 2009 22049605
11. Sawyer D, Do it by design. An introduction to human factors in medical devices.US department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration, Centre for Device and Radiological Health, USA 1997
12. User involvement competence for radical innovation. Lettl C, J Eng Technol Manage 2007 24 53 75 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2007.01.004
13. Success and failure of innovation: a literature review. Van der Panne G, Van Beers C, Kleinknecht A, Int J Innov Manage 2003 7 309 10.1142/ S1363919603000830
14. The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: medical device manufacturers perspectives. Money AG, Barnett J, Kuljis J, Craven MP, Martin JL, Young T, BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2011 11 15 10.1186/1472-6947-11-15 21356097
15. The challenges of user-based design in a medical equipment market. Brown DS, Field methods casebook for software design Wiley, 2006 157 176
16. Getting to know your users: Usability roundtables at Lotus development. Butler MB, Interactions 1996 3 23 30 10.1145/223500.223507
17. The Wrong Trousers? Beyond the Design Fallacy: Social Learning and the User. Stewart J, Williams R, User Involvement in Innovation Processes: Strategies and Limitations from a Socio-Technical Perspective Profil Verlag, Munich, Rohracher H, 2005
18. Winning businesses in product development, the critical success factors. Cooper RG, Kleinschmidt EJ, Res Tech Manage 1996 39 18 29
19. Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Cooper RG, Bus Horiz 1990 44 56 20161685
20. Stage-gate processes for the development of medical devices. Pietzsch JB, Shluzas LA, Paté-Cornell ME, Yock PG, Linehan JH, J Med Device 2009 3 021004 10.1115/1.3148836
21. The case study crisis: some answers. Yin RK, Adm Sci Q 1981 26 58 65 10.2307/2392599
22. A user-centred approach to requirements elicitation in medical device development: A case study from an industry perspective. Martin JL, Clark DJ, Morgan SP, Crowe JA, Murphy E, App Ergon 2012 43 184 190 10.1016/j.apergo.2011. 05.002
23. Contextual Inquiry for Medical Device Development: A Case Study. Martin JL, Crowe JA, Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare CRC Press, Ch, Duffy VG, 2010 62
24. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 13407: Human-centred design processes for interactive systems International Organization for Standardization, Geneva 1999
25. User participation in requirements elicitation comparing focus group interviews and usability tests for eliciting usability requirements for medical equipment: a case study. Garmer K, Ylven J, Karlsson ICM, Int J Ind Ergonom 2004 33 85 98 10.1016/j.ergon.2003.07.005
26. A model of organizational responsiveness to stakeholders. Chess C, Risk 1999 10 257 267
27. Benchmarking the Firm's Critical Success Factors in New Product Development. Cooper RG, Kleinschmidt EJ, J Prod Innovat Manag 1995 12 374 391 10.1016/0737-6782(95)00059-3
28. Managing Our Way to Economic Decline. Hayes R, Abernathy WJ, Harvard Bus Rev 1980 67 77
29. Hamel G, Prahalad CK: Competing for the Future Harvard Business School Press, Boston 1994
30. Users Contributions to Radical Innovation: Evidence from Four Cases in the Field of Medical Equipment Technology. Lettl C, Gemünden HG, Herstatt C, R&D Manage 2006 36 251 272 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00431.x 22937514
31. Developing medical device technologies from users perspectives: a theoretical framework for involving users in the development process. Shah SG, Robinson I, AlShawi S, Int J Technol Assess 2009 25 514 521 10.1017/ S0266462309990328
32. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Nickerson RS, Rev Gen Psychol 1998 2 175 220
33. Evans JSBT, Bias in Human Reasoning: Causes and Consequences Lawrence Erlbaum, Hove and London 1990
34. Status Quo Bias in Decision Making. Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R, J Risk Uncertainty 1998 1 7 59
35. Overcoming status quo bias in the human brain. Fleming SM, Thomas CL, Dolan RJ, P Natl Acad Sci USA 2010 107 6005 6009 10.1073/pnas.0910380107
36. Customer-developer links in software development. Keil M, Carmel E, Commun ACM 1995 37 33 44
37. Focus groups to support the industrial/product designer: A review based on current literature and designers' feedback. Bruseberg A, McDonagh-Philp D, App Ergon 2002 33 27 38 10.1016/S0003-6870(01)00053-9
38. Designing for Usability: Key principles and what designers think. Gould JD, Lewis C, Commun ACM 1985 28 300 311 10.1145/3166.3170