A model of user engagement in medical device development

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 484-493

  Grocott, Patricia ^a   Weir, Heather ^a   Ram, Mala Bridgelal ^b  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Design and development; Medical equipment; Quality

Indexed keywords

APPARATUS, EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; ARTICLE; CONSUMER; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; UNITED KINGDOM;

CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; ENGLAND; EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 34548698709     PISSN: 09526862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09526860710819422     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bridgelal Ram, M., Browne, N., Grocott, P. and Weir, H. (2005), Methodologies to Capture User Perspectives in Medical Device Development: A Survey of the Healthcare Literature, Multidisciplinary Assessment of Technologies Centre for Healthcare (MATCH) Report, available at: www.match.ac.uk.
2. Browne, N., Grocott, P. and Cowley, S. (2004a), "The wound dressing supply chain within England's National Health Service: unravelling the context for users", Journal of Nursing Management, Vol. 12, pp. 51-61.
3. Browne, N., Grocott, P., Cowley, S., Cameron, J., Dealey, C., Keogh, A., Lovatt, A., Vowden, K. and Vowden, P. (2004b), "Woundcare research for appropriate products (WRAP): validation of the TELER method involving users", International Journal of Nursing Studies, Vol. 41, pp. 559-71.
4. Cayton, H. (2002), "Patient and public involvement", Journal of Health Service Research Policy, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 193-4.
5. Cooper, R.G. and Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1986), "An investigation into the new product process: steps, deficiencies and impact", Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 71-85.
6. Department of Health (DH) (2001), The Expert Patient: a New Approach to Chronic Disease Management for the 21st Century, Department of Health, London, available at: www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/01/85/78/04018578.pdf.
7. Grocott, P., Browne, N. and Cowley, S. (2005), "Quality of life: assessing the impact and benefits of care to patients with fungating wounds", WOUNDS: A Compendium of Clinical Research and Practice, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 8-15.
8. Harrison, S. and Mort, M. (1998), "Which champions, which people? Public and user involvement in health care as a technology of legitimation", Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 60-70.
9. Healthcare Industries Task Force (HITF) (2004), Better Health through Partnership: A Programme for Action, Healthcare Industries Task Force, London, available at: www.advisorybodies.doh.gov.uk/hitf/hitffinalreportnov2004.pdf.
10. Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2004), "Materializing research promises: opportunities, priorities and conflicts in translational medicine", Journal of Translational Medicine, Vol. 2 No. 5, pp. 1-12.
11. Le Roux, A.A. (1993), "TELER: the concept", Physiotherapy, Vol. 79 No. 1, pp. 755-8.
12. Lloyd, J. and Wait, S. (2006), Integrated Care. A Guide for Policymakers, Integrated Longevity Centre-UK, available at: www.ilcuk.org.uk/publications. cfm.
13. Mann, W.C., Hurren, D., Tomita, M. and Charvat, B. (1995), "An analysis of problems with walkers encountered by elderly persons", Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, Vol. 13 Nos 1/2, pp. 1-23.
14. Martin, J., Crowe, J., Murphy, E. and Norris, B. (2005), Methods to Capture User Perspectives in the Medical Device Technology Cycle: A Review of the Engineering and Ergonomics Literature, Multidisciplinary Assessment of Technologies Centre for Healthcare (MATCH) Report, Project 3, Deliverable 6, available at: www.www,match.ac.uk.
15. Medical Research Council (MRC) (2000), Health Services and Public Health Research Board. A Framework for Development and Evaluation of RCTs for Complex Interventions to Improve Health, Medical Research Council, London.
16. National Health Service Innovation Hubs (2005), available at: www.innovations.nhs.uk/.
17. Rhodes, P. and Nocon, A. (1998), "User involvement and the NHS reforms", Health Expectations, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 73-82.
18. Reimer-Reiss, M.L. (1999), "Applying Rogers diffusion of innovations theory to assistive technology discontinuance", Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 16-21.
19. Ritchie, J. and Spencer, L. (1994), "Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research", in Bryman, A. and Burgess, R.G. (Eds), Analyzing Qualitative Data, Routledge, London.
20. Robson, C. (2002), Real World Research, 2nd ed., Blackwell, Oxford.
21. Samson, M. (2005), "Christine Harland: health of a nation", Health Equipment and Supplies, 20 June, pp. 1-4.
22. Sculpher, M., Drummond, M. and Buxton, M. (1997), "The iterative use of economic evaluation as part of the process of health technology assessment", Journal of Health Services Research Policy, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 26-30.
23. Sheredos, S.J. and Cupo, M.E. (1997), "The Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development Service's technology transfer process", Technology & Disability, Vol. 7 Nos 1-2, pp. 25-9.
24. Ta, L.E., Phero, J.C., Pillemer, S.R., Hale-Donze, H., McCartney-Francis, N., Kingman, A., Max, M.B., Gordon, S.M., Wahl, S.M. and Dionne, R.A. (2002), "Clinical evaluation of patients with temporomandibular joint implants", Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol. 60 No. 12, pp. 1389-99.
25. UK Government (1998), Data Protection Act 1998, available at: www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts1998/19980029.htm.