Contextual Inquiry for Medical Device Development: A Case Study

Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 549-557

  Martin, Jennifer L ^a   Crowe, John A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Contextual inquiry; Healthcare; Interview; Medical device; Observation; Usability

Indexed keywords

EID: 85134999289     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/EBK1439834978-64     Document Type: Chapter

References (7)

1. Briers, J.D., (2001) “Laser Doppler, speckle and related techniques for blood perfusion mapping and imaging.” Physiological Measurement. 22(4) R35-66.
2. Coble, J.M., Karat, J. and Kahn, M.G. (1997), “Maintaining a focus on user requirements throughout the development of clinical workstation software reports.” Proceedings of the 1997 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI, Mar 22-27 1997. ACM, New York, NY, USA, Atlanta, GA, USA, 170.
3. Holtzblatt, K., and Beyer, H. (1993) “Making customer-centered design work for teams.” Communications oftheACM, 36(10), 93-99.
4. Martin, J.L., Murphy, E., Crowe,. I.A. and Norris, B..T. (2006) “Capturing user requirements in medical device development: the role of ergonomics.” Physiological Measurement, 27(8):R49-62.
5. Morris, C. (1999), “Patient pull: the changing influences on medical device design, Part I.” Medical Device Technology, 10(4), 30-33.
6. Sawyer, D., Aziz, K.J., Backinger, C. L., et al. (1996), “Do it by Design: An Introduction to Human Factors in medical Devices”. In: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Dmg Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
7. Webb, R.K., Russell, W.J., Klepper, I. and Runciman, W.B. (1993), “The Australian Incident Monitoring Study. Equipment failure: an analysis of 2000 incident reports.” Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 21(5), 673-677.