ARTICLE;
FOLLOW UP;
HEALTH SURVEY;
HUMAN;
INCIDENCE;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MEDICAL AUDIT;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;
POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD;
PROSTHESIS LOOSENING;
RECURRENT DISEASE;
REOPERATION;
RISK FACTOR;
SURGICAL APPROACH;
TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;
UNITED KINGDOM;
ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP;
FEMALE;
HIP DISLOCATION;
HUMANS;
INCIDENCE;
JOINT INSTABILITY;
MALE;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;
RECURRENCE;
REOPERATION;
RISK FACTORS;
TIME FACTORS;
Comparison of the transtrochanteric and posterior approaches for total hip replacement
Robinson RP, Robinson HJ, Salvati EA. Comparison of the transtrochanteric and posterior approaches for total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1980; 147: 142-7.
The influence of patient related factors and the position of the acetabular component on the rate of dislocation after total hip replacement
Paterno SA, Lachiewicz PF, Kelley SS. The influence of patient related factors and the position of the acetabular component on the rate of dislocation after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79: 1202-10.
Outcome of Charnley total hip replacement across a single health region in England: The results at five years from a regional hip register
Fender D, Harper WM, Gregg PJ. Outcome of Charnley total hip replacement across a single health region in England: the results at five years from a regional hip register. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81: 577-81.