Impedance modulation and feedback corrections in tracking targets of variable size and frequency

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 96, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 2750-2759

  Selen, Luc P J ^a   Van Dieën, Jaap H ^a   Beek, Peter J ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMPEDANCE; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; BIOMECHANICS; ELBOW; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33751224742     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00552.2006     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bennett DJ. Torques generated at the human elbow joint in response to constant position errors imposed during voluntary movements. Exp Brain Res 95: 488-498, 1993.
2. Bennett DJ, Hollerbach JM, Xu Y, and Hunter IW. Time-varying stiffness of human elbow joint during cyclic voluntary movement. Exp Brain Res 88: 433-442, 1992.
3. Bernstein NA. The Coordination and Regulation of Movements. London: Pergamon, 1967.
4. Burdet E and Milner TE. Quantization of human motions and learning of accurate movements. Biol Cybern 78: 307-318, 1998.
5. Burdet E, Osu R, Franklin DW, Milner TE, and Kawato M. The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance. Nature 414: 446-449, 2001.
6. Dounskaia N, Wisleder D, and Johnson T. Influence of biomechanical factors on substructure of pointing movements. Exp Brain Res 164: 505-516, 2005.
7. Efron B and Tibshirani RJ. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. London: Chapman and Hall, 1993.
8. Fishbach A, Roy SA, Bastianen C, Miller LE, and Houk JC. Kinematic properties of on-line error corrections in the monkey. Exp Brain Res 164: 442-457, 2005.
9. Fitts P. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47: 381-391, 1954.
10. Franklin DW, Osu R, Burdet E, Kawato M, and Milner TE. Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamics model. J Neurophysiol 90: 3270-3282, 2003.
11. Gribble PL, Mullin LI, Cothros N, and Mattar A. Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy. J Neurophysiol 89: 2396-2405, 2003.
12. Harris CM and Wolpert DM. Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394: 780-784, 1998.
13. Jones KE, Hamilton AF, and Wolpert DM. Sources of signal-dependent noise during isometric force production. J Neurophysiol 88: 1533-1544, 2002.
14. Kalveram KT, Schinauer T, Beirle S, Richter S, and Jansen-Osmann P. Threading neural feedforward into a mechanical spring: how biology exploits physics in limb control. Biol Cybern 92: 229-240, 2005.
15. Kay BA, Saltzman EL, and Kelso JA. Steady-state and perturbed rhythmical movements: a dynamical analysis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 17: 183-197, 1991.
16. Kearney RE and Hunter IW. System identification of human joint dynamics. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 18: 55-87, 1990.
17. Kirsch RF, Boskov D, and Rymer WZ. Muscle stiffness during transient and continuous movements of cat muscle: perturbation characteristics and physiological relevance. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 41: 758-770, 1994.
18. Laursen B, Jensen BR, and Sjogaard G. Effect of speed and precision demands on human shoulder muscle electromyography during a repetitive task. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 78: 544-548, 1998.
19. Meyer DE, Abrams RA, Kornblum S, Wright CE, and Smith JE. Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychol Rev 95: 340-370, 1988.
20. Miall RC, Weir DJ, and Stein JF. Manual tracking of visual targets by trained monkeys. Behav Brain Res 20: 185-201, 1986.
21. Miall RC, Weir DJ, and Stein JF. Intermittency in human manual tracking tasks. J Motor Behav 25: 53-63, 1993.
22. Milner TE. Dependence of elbow viscoelastic behavior on speed and loading in voluntary movements. Exp Brain Res 93: 177-180, 1993.
23. Milner TE and Ijaz MM. The effect of accuracy constraints on three-dimensional movement kinematics. Neuroscience 35: 365-374, 1990.
24. Osu R, Kamimura N, Iwasaki H, Nakano E, Harris CM, Wada Y, and Kawato M. Optimal impedance control for task achievement in the presence of signal-dependent noise. J Neurophysiol 92: 1199-1215, 2004.
25. Pasalar S, Roitman AV, and Ebner TJ. Effects of speeds and force fields on submovements during circular manual tracking in humans. Exp Brain Res 163: 214-225, 2005.
26. Perreault EJ. Influence of voluntary posture selection on endpoint stiffness. In: Abstracts for International Society of Biomechanics XXth Congress. Cleveland, OH.
27. Rohrer B and Hogan N. Avoiding spurious submovement decompositions. II. A scattershot algorithm. Biol Cybern 94: 409-414, 2006.
28. Roitman AV, Massaquoi SG, Takahashi K, and Ebner TJ. Kinematic analysis of manual tracking in monkeys: characterization of movement intermittencies during a circular tracking task. J Neurophysiol 91: 901-911, 2004.
29. Sandfeld J and Jensen BR. Effect of computer mouse gain and visual demand on mouse clicking performance and muscle activation in a young and elderly group of experienced computer users. Appl Ergon 36: 547-555, 2005.
30. Schaal S and Schweighofer N. Computational motor control in humans and robots. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15: 675-682, 2005.
31. Schmidt R, Zelaznik H, Hawkins B, Frank J, and Quinn JT Jr. Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychol Rev 47: 415-451, 1979.
32. Seidler-Dobrin RD, He J, and Stelmach GE. Coactivation to reduce variability in the elderly. Motor Control 2: 314-330, 1998.
33. Selen LPJ, Beek PJ, and Van Dieën JH. Can co-activation reduce kinematic variability? A simulation study. Biol Cybern 93: 373-381, 2005.
34. Selen LPJ, Beek PJ, and Van Dieën JH. Impedance is modulated to meet accuracy demands during goal-directed arm movements. Exp Brain Res 172: 129-138, 2006.
35. Todorov E and Jordan MI. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5: 1226-1235, 2002.
36. Van Galen GP and De Jong W. Fitts' law as the outcome of a dynamic noise filtering model of motor control. Hum Mov Sci 12: 539-571, 1995.
37. Van Galen GP and Schomaker LRB. Fitts law as a low-pass filter effect of muscle stiffness. Hum Mov Sci 11: 11-21, 1992.
38. Van Galen GP and Van Huygevoort M. Error, stress and the role of neuromotor noise in space oriented behaviour. Biol Psychol 51: 151-171, 2000.
39. Van Gemmert AW and Van Galen GP. Stress, neuromotor noise, and human performance: a theoretical perspective. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23: 1299-1313, 1997.
40. Van Roon DB, and Meulenbroek RGJ. Trunk use and co-contraction in cerebral palsy as regulatory mechanisms for accuracy control. Neuropsychologia 43: 497-508, 2005.
41. Visser B, De Looze M, De Graaff M, and Van Dieën JH. Effects of precision demands and mental pressure on muscle activation and hand forces in computer mouse tasks. Ergonomics 47: 202-217, 2004.