Proprioception plays a different role for sensorimotor adaptation to different distortions

Human Movement Science

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 415-423

  Bock, Otmar ^a   Thomas, Monika ^a  

^a GERMAN SPORT UNIVERSITY COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Kinesthesia; Motor learning; Sensorimotor coordination; Vibration

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; ELBOW; FEMALE; FORCE; HAND; HAND VELOCITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PROPRIOCEPTION; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SHOULDER; TASK PERFORMANCE; VELOCITY; VIBRATION SENSE; WRIST;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; JOINTS; KINESTHESIS; MALE; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; NEURAL PATHWAYS; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VIBRATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79955874741     PISSN: 01679457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.10.007     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bard C., Fleury M., Teasdale N., Paillard J., Nougier V. Contribution of proprioception for calibrating and updating the motor space. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 1995, 73:246-254.
2. Bock O. Components of sensorimotor adaptation in young and elderly subjects. Experimental Brain Research 2005, 160:259-263.
3. Bock O., Pipereit K., Mierau A. A method to reversibly degrade proprioceptive feedback in research on human motor control. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2007, 160:246-250.
4. Bock O., Vercher J.-L., Gauthier G. Wrist vibration affects the production of finely graded forces. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 2005, 76:435-440.
5. Bourdin C., Bock O. Sensorimotor adaptation to inertial forces in a multi-force environment does not depend on the number of targets: Indirect validation of the altered-proprioception hypothesis. Neuroscience Letters 2006, 408:173-177.
6. Clower D., Boussaoud D. Selective use of perceptual recalibration versus visuomotor skill acquisition. Journal of Neurophysiology 2000, 84:2703-2708.
7. Cole J. Pride and a daily marathon 1995, MIT Press, Boston.
8. Gilhodes J., Roll J., Tardy-Gervet M. Perceptual and motor effects of agonist-antagonist muscle vibration in man. Experimental Brain Research 1986, 61:395-402.
9. Goodwin G.M., McCloskey D.I., Matthews P.B.C. The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents. Brain 1972, 95:705-748.
10. Guedon O., Gauthier G., Cole J., Vercher J.-L., Blouin J. Adaptation in visuomanual tracking depends on intact proprioception. Journal of Motor Behavior 1998, 30:234-248.
11. Hay J., Pick H., Ikeda K. Visual capture produced by prism spectacles. Psychological Science 1965, 2:215-216.
12. Ingram H., van Donkelaar P., Cole J., Vercher J.-L., Gauthier G., Miall R. The role of proprioception and attention in a visuomotor adaptation task. Experimental Brain Research 2000, 132:114-126.
13. Lajoie Y., Paillard J., Teasdale N., Bard C., Fleury M., Forget R., et al. Mirror drawing in a deafferented patient and normal subjects: Visuoproprioceptive conflict. Neurology 1992, 42:1104-1106.
14. Mather J.A., Lackner J.R. Visual tracking of active and passive movements of the hand. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1980, 32:307-315.
15. McNay E.C., Willingham D.B. Deficit in learning of a motor skill requiring strategy, but not of perceptual-motor recalibration, with aging. Learning and Memory 1998, 4:411-420.
16. Miall C. Weight estimation in a "deafferented" man and in control subjects: Are judgements influenced by peripheral or central signals?. Experimental Brain Research 2000, 133:491-500.
17. Pipereit K., Bock O., Vercher J.-L. The contribution of proprioceptive feedback to sensorimotor adaptation. Experimental Brain Research 2006, 174:45-52.
18. Redding G., Wallace B. Adaptive spatial alignment and strategic perceptual-motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1996, 22:379-394.
19. Roll J., Vedel J., Ribot E. Alteration of proprioceptive messages induced by tendon vibration in man: A microneurographic study. Experimental Brain Research 1989, 76:213-222.
20. Sarlegna F., Malfait N., Bringoux L., Bourdin C., Vercher J.-L. Force-field adaptation without proprioception: Can vision be used to model limb dynamics?. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:60-67.
21. Scheidt R., Conditt M., Secco E., Mussa-Ivaldi F. Interaction of visual and proprioceptive feedback during adaptation of human reaching movements. Journal of Neurophysiology 2005, 93:3200-3213.
22. Shadmehr R., Holcomb H. Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation. Science 1997, 277:821-825.
23. Stein B., Meredith M. The merging of the senses 1993, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
24. Taub E., Goldberg I.A. Use of sensory recombination and somatosensory deafferentation techniques in the investigation of sensory-motor integration. Perception 1974, 3:393-408.
25. Thomas M., Bock O. Is sensorimotor adaptation to position- and velocity-dependent visual distortions based on distinct adaptive processes?. Human Movement Science 2010, 29:179-186.
26. Tong C., Wolpert D., Flanagan J. Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: Evidence from an interference study. Journal of Neuroscience 2002, 22:1106-1113.
27. Tseng Y., Diedrichsen J., Krakauer J., Shadmehr R., Bastian A. Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. Journal of Neurophysiology 2007, 98:54-68.
28. Vuillerme N., Danion F., Forestier N., Nougier V. Postural sway under muscle vibration and muscle fatigue in humans. Neuroscience Letters 2002, 33:131-135.
29. Werner S., Bock O., Gizewski E., Schoch B., Timmann D. Visuomotor adaptive improvement and aftereffects are impaired differentially following cerebellar lesions in SCA and PICA territory. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 201:429-439.