Genetic effects of tank-forming bromeliads on the associated invertebrate community in a tropical forest ecosystem

Oecologia

Volumn 170, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 467-475

  Zytynska, Sharon E ^a,c   Khudr, Mouhammad Shadi ^a   Harris, Edwin ^b   Preziosi, Richard F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

AFLP; Ecosystem conservation; Genetic interactions; Species interactions

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; EPIPHYTE; GENETIC VARIATION; INVERTEBRATE; JUVENILE; MICROHABITAT; NUTRIENT ENRICHMENT; OVIPOSITION; PLANT COMMUNITY; RESEARCH WORK; TEMPERATE ENVIRONMENT; TROPICAL FOREST;

AECHMEA BRACTEATA; ANIMALIA; INVERTEBRATA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 84866328594     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-012-2310-3     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Anderson SS, McCrea KD, Abrahamson WG, Hartzel LM (1989) Host genotype choice by the ball gallmaker Eurosta solidaginis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ecology 70: 1048-1054.
2. Araújo VA, Melo SK, Araújo AP, Gomes ML, Carneiro MA (2007) Relationship between invertebrate fauna and bromeliad size. Braz J Biol 67: 611-617.
3. Armbruster P, Hutchinson RA, Cotgreave P (2002) Factors influencing community structure in a South American tank bromeliad fauna. Oikos 96: 225-234.
4. Bailey JK (2011) From genes to ecosystems: a genetic basis to ecosystem services. Popul Ecol 53: 47-52.
5. Bailey JK, Schweitzer JA, Rehill BJ, Lindroth RL, Martinsen GD, Whitham TG (2004) Beavers as molecular geneticists: a genetic basis to the foraging of an ecosystem engineer. Ecology 85: 603-608. doi: 10. 1890/03-3049.
6. Bangert RK, Turek RJ, Martinsen GD, Wimp GM, Bailey JK, Whitham TG (2005) Benefits of conservation of plant genetic diversity to arthropod diversity. Conserv Biol 19: 379.
7. Bangert RK, Turek RJ, Rehill B, Wimp GM, Schweitzer JA, Allan GJ, Bailey JK, Martinsen GD, Keim P et al (2006) A genetic similarity rule determines arthropod community structure. Mol Ecol 15: 1379-1391. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-294X. 2005. 02749. x.
8. Bangert RK, Lonsdorf EV, Wimp GM, Shuster SM, Fischer D, Schweitzer JA, Allan GJ, Bailey JK, Whitham TG (2008) Genetic structure of a foundation species: scaling community phenotypes from the individual to the region. Heredity 100: 121-131. doi: 10. 1038/sj. hdy. 6800914.
9. Bentley MD, Day JF (1989) Chemical ecology and behavioral aspects of mosquito oviposition. Annu Rev Entomol 34: 401-421.
10. Bray JR, Curtis JT (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 27: 325-349.
11. Carius HJ, Little TJ, Ebert D (2001) Genetic variation in a host-parasite association: potential for coevolution and frequency-dependent selection. Evolution 55: 1136-1145.
12. Chase MW, Hills HH (1991) Silica gel: an ideal material for field preservation of leaf samples for DNA studies. Taxonomy 40: 215-220.
13. Diesel R, Schuh M (1993) Maternal care in the bromeliad crab Metopaulias depressus (Decapoda): maintaining oxygen, pH and calcium levels optimal for the larvae. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32: 11-15.
14. Dobson A, Crawley M (1994) Pathogens and the structure of plant communities. Trends Ecol Evol 9: 393-398.
15. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19: 11-15.
16. Dungey HS, Potts BM, Whitham TG, Li HF (2000) Plant genetics affects arthropod community richness and composition: evidence from a synthetic eucalypt hybrid population. Evolution 54: 1938-1946.
17. Frank JH, Lounibos LP (2009) Insects and allies associated with bromeliads: a review. Terr Arthropod Rev 1: 125-153. doi: 10. 1163/187498308X414742.
18. Fritz RS, Price PW (1988) Genetic variation among plants and insect community structure: willows and sawflies. Ecology 69: 845-856.
19. Gaylord ES, Preszler RW, Boecklen WJ (1996) Interactions between host plants, endophytic fungi, and a phytophagous insect in an oak (Quercus grisea × Q. gambelii) hybrid zone. Oecologia 105: 336-342.
20. Glinwood R, Ahmed E, Qvarfordt E, Ninkovic V (2011) Olfactory learning of plant genotypes by a polyphagous insect predator. Oecologia 166: 637-647. doi: 10. 1007/s00442-010-1892-x.
21. Haloin JR, Strauss SY (2008) Interplay between ecological communities and evolution: review of feedbacks from microevolutionary to macroevolutionary scales. Ann NY Acad Sci 1133: 87-125. doi: 10. 1196/annals. 1438. 003.
22. Hersch-Green EI, Turley NE, Johnson MT (2011) Community genetics: what have we accomplished and where should we be going? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 366: 1453-1460. doi: 10. 1098/rstb. 2010. 0331.
23. Hooper DU, Chapin FS III, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M et al (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75: 3-35.
24. Iason GR, Lennon JJ, Pakeman RJ, Thoss V, Beaton JK, Sim DA, Elston DA (2005) Does chemical composition of individual Scots pine trees determine the biodiversity of their associated ground vegetation? Ecol Lett 8: 364-369. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1461-0248. 2005. 00732. x.
25. Ives AR, Cardinale BJ, Snyder WE (2005) A synthesis of subdisciplines: predator-prey interactions, and biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Ecol Lett 8: 102-116.
26. Johnson MTJ, Lajeunesse MJ, Agrawal AA (2006) Additive and interactive effects of plant genotypic diversity on arthropod communities and plant fitness. Ecol Lett 9: 24-34.
27. Krugel P, Richter S (1995) Syncope antenori-A Bromeliad Breeding Frog with Free-Swimming, Nonfeeding Tadpoles (Anura, Microhylidae). Copeia 1995: 955-963.
28. Laessle AM (1961) A micro-limnological study of Jamaican bromeliads. Ecology 42: 499-517.
29. Larsen TH, Williams NM, Kremen C (2005) Extinction order and altered community structure rapidly disrupt ecosystem functioning. Ecol Lett 8: 538-547.
30. Luck GW, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (2003) Population diversity and ecosystem services. Trends Ecol Evol 18: 331-336.
31. Muller MS, McWilliams SR, Podlesak D, Donaldson JR, Bothwell HM, Lindroth RL (2006) Tri-trophic effects of plant defenses: chickadees consume caterpillars based on host leaf chemistry. Oikos 114: 507-517.
32. Nadkarni N (1994) Diversity of species and interactions in the upper tree canopy of forest ecosystems. Am Zool 34: 70-78.
33. Reusch TB, Ehlers A, Hämmerli A, Worm B (2005) Ecosystem recovery after climatic extremes enhanced by genotypic diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 2826-2831. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0500008102.
34. Richardson BA (1999) The bromeliad microcosm and the assessment of faunal diversity in a Neotropical forest. Biotropica 31: 321-336.
35. Rosenberg MS, Anderson CD (2011) PASSaGE: Pattern analysis, spatial statistics and geographic exegesis. Version 2. Methods Ecol Evol 2: 229-232.
36. Rowntree JK, Shuker DM, Preziosi RF (2011) Forward from the crossroads of ecology and evolution. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 366: 1322-1328.
37. Schweitzer JA, Rehill BJ, Martinsen GD, Lindroth RL, Keim P, Whitham TG (2004) Genetically based trait in a dominant tree affects ecosystem processes. Ecol Lett 7: 127-134. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1461-0248. 2003. 00562. x.
38. Service P (1984) Genotypic interactions in an aphid-host plant relationship: Uroleucon rudbeckiae and Rudbeckia laciniata. Oecologia 61: 271-276.
39. Shaffer ML (1981) Minimum population sizes for species conservation. Bioscience 31: 131-134.
40. Srivastava DS (2006) Habitat structure, trophic structure and ecosystem function: interactive effects in a bromeliad-insect community. Oecologia 149: 493-504. doi: 10. 1007/s00442-006-0467-3.
41. Stuntz S, Zielger C, Simon U, Zotz G (2002) Diversity and structure of the arthropod fauna within three canopy epiphyte species in central Panama. J Trop Ecol 18: 161-176.
42. Tack AJM, Johnson MTJ, Roslin T (2011) Sizing up community genetics: it's a matter of scale. Oikos. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1600-0706. 2011. 19926. x.
43. Vellend M, Geber MA (2005) Connections between species diversity and genetic diversity. Ecol Lett 8: 767-781.
44. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van De Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J et al (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23: 4407-4414.
45. Wake DB (1987) Adaptive radiation of salamanders in middle American cloud forests. Ann Mo Bot Gard 74: 242-264.
46. Wennstrom A, Hjulstrom LN, Hjalten J, Julkunen-Tiitto R (2010) Mother really knows best: host choice of adult phytophagous insect females reflects a within-host variation in suitability as larval food. Chemoecology 20: 35-42.
47. Whitham TG, Young WP, Martinsen GD, Gehring CA, Schweitzer JA, Shuster SM, Wimp GM, Fischer DG, Bailey JK et al (2003) Community and ecosystem genetics: a consequence of the extended phenotype. Ecology 84: 559-573.
48. Whitham TG, Bailey JK, Schweitzer JA, Shuster SM, Bangert RK, LeRoy CJ, Lonsdorf EV, Allan GJ, DiFazio SP et al (2006) A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: from genes to ecosystems. Nat Rev Genet 7: 510-523. doi: 10. 1038/nrg1877.
49. Yanoviak SP (2001) Container color and location affect macroinvertebrate community structure in artificial treeholes in Panama. Fla Entomol 84: 265-271.
50. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Smith GM (2007) Analysing ecological data. Springer, New York.
51. Zytynska SE, Preziosi RF (2011) Genetic interactions influence host preference and performance in a plant-insect system. Evol Ecol 25: 1321-1333. doi: 10. 1007/s10682-011-9493-7.
52. Zytynska SE, Fleming S, Tetard-Jones C, Kertesz MA, Preziosi RF (2010) Community genetic interactions mediate indirect ecological effects between a parasitoid wasp and rhizobacteria. Ecology 91: 1563-1568.
53. Zytynska SE, Fay MF, Penny D, Preziosi RF (2011) Genetic variation in a tropical tree species influences the associated epiphytic plant and invertebrate communities in a complex forest ecosystem. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 366: 1329-1336.