Computational models of perirhinal cortex function

Hippocampus

Volumn 22, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1952-1964

  Cowell, Rosemary A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational model; Familiarity; Perirhinal cortex; Recognition memory; Visual discrimination

Indexed keywords

ANTI HEBBIAN MODEL; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CALCIUM TRANSPORT; COGNITION; COMPUTER MODEL; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DIFFERENTIATION; HEBBIAN MODEL; HIPPOCAMPAL CA3 REGION; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMAN; INFERIOR TEMPORAL CORTEX; LONG TERM DEPRESSION; NEOCORTEX; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; PERIRHINAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RECOGNITION; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CEREBRAL CORTEX; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL;

EID: 84866317702     PISSN: 10509631     EISSN: 10981063     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22064     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Aggleton JP, Keen S, Warburton EC, Bussey TJ. 1997. Extensive cytotoxic lesions involving both the rhinal cortices and area TE impair recognition but spare spatial alternation in the rat. Brain Res Bull 43: 279-287.
2. Barense MD, Bussey TJ, Lee ACH, Rogers TT, Davies RR, Saksida LM, Murray EA, Graham KS. 2005. Functional specialization in the human medial temporal lobe. J Neurosci 25: 10239-10246.
3. Barense MD, Gaffan D, Graham KS. 2007. The human medial temporal lobe processes online representations of complex objects. Neuropsychologia 45: 2963-2974.
4. Barense MD, Henson RNA, Lee ACH, Graham KS. 2010. Medial temporal lobe activity during complex discrimination of faces, objects, and scenes: Effects of viewpoint. Hippocampus 20: 389-401.
5. Bartko SJ, Cowell RA, Winters BD, Bussey TJ, Saksida LM. 2010. Heightened susceptibility to interference in an animal model of amnesia: Impairment in encoding, storage, retrieval-Or all three? Neuropsychologia 48: 2987-2997.
6. Bartko SJ, Winters BD, Cowell RA, Saksida LM, Bussey TJ. 2007a. Perceptual functions of perirhinal cortex in rats: Zero-delay object recognition and simultaneous oddity discriminations. J Neurosci 27: 2548-2559.
7. Bartko SJ, Winters BD, Cowell RA, Saksida LM, Bussey TJ. 2007b. Perirhinal cortex resolves feature ambiguity in configural object recognition and perceptual oddity tasks. Learn Memory 14: 821-832.
8. Baxter MG, Murray EA. 2001. Opposite relationship of hippocampal and rhinal cortex damage to delayed nonmatching-to-sample deficits in monkeys. Hippocampus 11: 61-71.
9. Blake L, Jarvis CD, Mishkin M. 1977. Pattern-discrimination thresholds after partial inferior temporal or lateral striate lesions in monkeys. Brain Res 120: 209-220.
10. Bliss TV, Lomo T. 1973. Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. J Physiol 232: 331-356.
11. Bogacz R, Brown MW. 2002. The restricted influence of sparseness of coding on the capacity of familiarity discrimination networks. Network 13: 457-485.
12. Bogacz R, Brown MW. 2003a. An anti-Hebbian model of familiarity discrimination in the perirhinal cortex. Neurocomputing 52: 1-6.
13. Bogacz R, Brown MW. 2003b. Comparison of computational models of familiarity discrimination in the perirhinal cortex. Hippocampus 13: 494-524.
14. Bogacz R, Brown MW, Giraud-Carrier C. 2001. Model of familiarity discrimination in the perirhinal cortex. J Comput Neurosci 10: 5-23.
15. Brown MW, Aggleton JP. 2001. Recognition memory: What are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus? Nat Rev Neurosci 2: 51-61.
16. Buckley MJ, Booth MC, Rolls ET, Gaffan D. 2001. Selective perceptual impairments after perirhinal cortex ablation. J Neurosci 21: 9824-9836.
17. Buckley MJ, Gaffan D. 1997. Impairment of visual object-discrimination learning after perirhinal cortex ablation. Behav Neurosci 111: 467-475.
18. Buckley MJ, Gaffan D. 1998a. Learning and transfer of object-reward associations and the role of the perirhinal cortex. Behav Neurosci 112: 15-23.
19. Buckley MJ, Gaffan D. 1998b. Perirhinal cortex ablation impairs visual object identification. J Neurosci 18: 2268-2275.
20. Buckley MJ, Gaffan D, Murray EA. 1997. Functional double dissociation between two inferior temporal cortical areas: Perirhinal cortex versus middle temporal gyrus. J Neurophysiol 77: 587-598.
21. Bussey TJ, Saksida LM. 2002. The organization of visual object representations: A connectionist model of effects of lesions in perirhinal cortex. Eur J Neurosci 15: 355-364.
22. Bussey TJ, Saksida LM. 2005. Object memory and perception in the medial temporal lobe: An alternative approach. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15: 730-737.
23. Bussey TJ, Saksida LM, Murray EA. 2002. Perirhinal cortex resolves feature ambiguity in complex visual discriminations. Eur J Neurosci 15: 365-374.
24. Bussey TJ, Saksida LM, Murray EA. 2003. Impairments in visual discrimination after perirhinal cortex lesions: Testing 'declarative' vs. 'perceptual-mnemonic' views of perirhinal cortex function. Eur J Neurosci 17: 649-660.
25. Churchland PS, Sejnowski TJ. 1988. Perspectives on cognitive neuroscience. Science 242: 741-745.
26. Cowell RA, Bussey TJ, Saksida LM. 2006. Why does brain damage impair memory? A connectionist model of object recognition memory in perirhinal cortex. J Neurosci 26: 12186-12197.
27. Cowell RA, Bussey TJ, Saksida LM. 2010a. Components of recognition memory: Dissociable cognitive processes or just differences in representational complexity? Hippocampus 20: 1245-1262.
28. Cowell RA, Bussey TJ, Saksida LM. 2010b. Functional dissociations within the ventral object processing pathway: Cognitive modules or a hierarchical continuum? J Cogn Neurosci 22: 2460-2479.
29. Cowell RA, Bussey TJ, Saksida LM. 2011. Using computational modeling to understand cognition in the ventral visual-perirhinal pathway. Alonso E, Mondragon E, editors. Computational Neuroscience for Advancing Artifical Intelligence: Models, Methods and Applications. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. pp 15-45.
30. Cowey A, Gross CG. 1970. Effects of foveal prestriate and inferotemporal lesions on visual discrimination by rhesus monkeys. Exp Brain Res 11: 128-144.
31. Dudek SM, Bear MF. 1992. Homosynaptic long-term depression in area CA1 of hippocampus and effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor blockade. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 4363-4367.
32. Eichenbaum H, Yonelinas AP, Ranganath C. 2007. The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annu Rev Neurosci 30: 123-152.
33. Elfman KW, Parks CM, Yonelinas AP. 2008. Testing a neurocomputational model of recollection, familiarity, and source recognition. J Exp Psychol 34: 752-768.
34. Gaffan D, Harrison S, Gaffan EA. 1986. Visual identification following inferotemporal ablation in the monkey. Q J Exp Psychol B 38: 5-30.
35. Gaffan D, Murray EA. 1992. Monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) with rhinal cortex ablations succeed in object discrimination-learning despite 24-hr intertrial intervals and fail at matching to sample despite double sample presentations. Behav Neurosci 106: 30-38.
36. Gibson E. 1940. A systematic application of the concepts of generalization and differentiation to verbal learning. Psychol Rev 47: 196-229.
37. Graham KS, Barense MD, Lee ACH. 2010. Going beyond LTM in the MTL: A synthesis of neuropsychological and neuroimaging findings on the role of the medial temporal lobe in memory and perception. Neuropsychologia 48: 831-853.
38. Gross CG, Cowey A, Manning FJ. 1971. Further analysis of visual discrimination deficits following foveal prestriate and inferotemporal lesions in rhesus monkeys. J Comp Physiol Psychol 76: 1-7.
39. Iwai E, Mishkin M. 1968. Two visual foci in the temporal lobe of monkeys. Yoshii N, Buchwald N, editors. Neurophysiological Basis of Learning and Behavior. Japan: Osaka University Press.
40. Jenkins JG, Dallenbach KM. 1924. Obliviscence during sleep and waking. Am J Psychol 35: 605-612.
41. Li L, Miller EK, Desimone R. 1993. The representation of stimulus-familiarity in anterior inferior temporal cortex. J Neurophysiol 69: 1918-1929.
42. Malkova L, Bachevalier J, Mishkin M, Saunders RC. 2001. Neurotoxic lesions of perirhinal cortex impair visual recognition memory in rhesus monkeys. Neuroreport 12: 1913-1917.
43. McClelland JL, Chappell M. 1998. Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychol Rev 105: 724-760.
44. McClelland JL, Mcnaughton BL, O'Reilly RC. 1995. Why there are complementary learning-systems in the hippocampus and neocortex-Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychol Rev 102: 419-457.
45. McGeoch JA. 1932. Forgetting and the law of disuse. Psychol Rev 39: 352-370.
46. McTighe SM, Cowell RA, Winters BD, Bussey TJ, Saksida LM. 2010. Paradoxical false memory for objects after brain damage. Science 330: 1408-1410.
47. Meunier M, Bachevalier J, Mishkin M, Murray EA. 1993. Effects on visual recognition of combined and separate ablations of the entorhinal and perirhinal cortex in rhesus-monkeys. J Neurosci 13: 5418-5432.
48. Miller EK, Li L, Desimone R. 1991. A neural mechanism for working and recognition memory in inferior temporal cortex. Science 254: 1377-1379.
49. Mumby DG, Pinel JPJ. 1994. Rhinal cortex lesions and object recognition in rats. Behav Neurosci 108: 11-18.
50. Norman KA, O'Reilly RC. 2003. Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complementary-learning-systems approach. Psychol Rev 110: 611-646.
51. O'Reilly RC, Rudy JW. 2001. Conjunctive representations in learning and memory: Principles of cortical and hippocampal function. Psychol Rev 108: 311-345.
52. Ranganath C. 2010. A Unified framework for the functional organization of the medial temporal lobes and the phenomenology of episodic memory. Hippocampus 20: 1263-1290.
53. Ranganath C, Yonelinas AP, Cohen MX, Dy CJ, Tom SM, D'Esposito M. 2004. Dissociable correlates of recollection and familiarity within the medial temporal lobes. Neuropsychologia 42: 2-13.
54. Ratcliff R, Sheu CF, Gronlund SD. 1992. Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychol Rev 99: 518-535.
55. Saksida LM, Bussey TJ. 2010. The representational-hierarchical view of amnesia: Translation from animal to human. Neuropsychologia 48: 2370-2384.
56. Shiffrin RM, Ratcliff R, Clark SE. 1990. List-strength effect. 2. Theoretical mechanisms. J Exp Psychol 16: 179-195.
57. Shiffrin RM, Steyvers M. 1997. Model for recognition memory: REM-Retrieving effectively from memory. Psychon Bull Rev 4: 145-166.
58. Sohal VS, Hasselmo ME. 2000. A model for experience-dependent changes in the responses of inferotemporal neurons. Network 11: 169-190.
59. Squire LR, Stark CE, Clark RE. 2004. The medial temporal lobe. Annu Rev Neurosci 27: 279-306.
60. Squire LR, Zola-Morgan S. 1991. The medial temporal-lobe memory system. Science 253: 1380-1386.
61. Standing L. 1973. Learning 10, 000 pictures. Q J Exp Psychol 25: 207-222.
62. Suzuki WA, Amaral DG. 1994. Perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices of the macaque monkey-Cortical afferents. J Comp Neurol 350: 497-533.
63. Wilson M, Kaufman HM, Zieler RE, Lieb JP. 1972. Visual identification and memory in monkeys with circumscribed inferotemporal lesions. J Comp Physiol Psychol 78: 173-183.
64. Winters BD, Forwood SE, Cowell RA, Saksida LM, Bussey TJ. 2004. Double dissociation between the effects of peri-postrhinal cortex and hippocampal lesions on tests of object recognition and spatial memory: Heterogeneity of function within the temporal lobe. JNeurosci 24: 5901-5908.
65. Wixted JT. 2004. The psychology and neuroscience of forgetting. Annu Rev Psychol 55: 235-269.
66. Yonelinas AP. 1994. Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory-Evidence for a dual-process model. J Exp Psychol 20: 1341-1354.
67. Zola-Morgan S, Squire LR, Amaral DG, Suzuki WA. 1989. Lesions of perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex that spare the amygdala and hippocampal formation produce severe memory impairment. J Neurosci 9: 4355-4370.