Online friction: Studying sociotechnical conflicts to elicit user experience

International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 62-74

  Skågeby, Jörgen ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Conflicts; Discussion forums; Interaction design; User experience

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866267059     PISSN: 19416253     EISSN: 19416261     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jskd.2009040106     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alexander, C. (1979). The Timeless Way of Building: Oxford University Press.
2. Antoniadis, P., & Grand, B. L. (2007). Incentives for Resource Sharing in Self-Organized Communities: from Economics to Social Psychology Paper presented at the the 2nd International Conference on Digital Information Management, Lyon, France.
3. Arvola, M. (2004). Shades of Use. Linköping: Linköping University.
4. Arvola, M. (2006). Interaction design patterns for computers in sociable use. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 25(2/3), 128-139.
5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
6. Bruckman, A. (2002, Apr 4, 2002). Ethical Guidelines for Research Online. Retrieved Nov 20, 2007, from http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~asb/ethics/
7. Chen, S.-L. S., Hall, G. J., & Johns, M. D. (2004). Research Paparazzi in Cyberspace: The Voices of the Researched. In M. D. Johns, S.-L. S. Chen & G. J. Hall (Eds.), Online Social Research: Methods, Issues, & Ethics (pp. 157-178). New York: Peter Lang.
8. Clegg Smith, K. M. (2004). "Electronic Eavesdropping": The Ethical Issues Involved in Conducting a Virtual Ethnography. In M. D. Johns, S.-L. S. Chen & G. J. Hall (Eds.), Online Social Research: Methods, Issues, & Ethics (pp. 223-238). New York: Peter Lang.
9. Dholakia, N., & Zhang, D. (2004). Online Qualitative Research in the Age of E-Commerce: Data Sources and Approaches [27 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], 5(2).
10. Diggins, T., & Tolmie, P. (2003). The 'adequate' design of ethnographic outputs for practice: some explorations of the characteristics of design resources. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 7(3-4), 147-158.
11. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Vähäaho, T. (1999). When the Center Does Not Hold: The Importance of Knotworking. In S. Chailkin, M. Hedegaard & U. J. Jensen (Eds.), Activity Theory and Social Practice: Cultural-Historical Approaches: Aarhus University Press.
13. Erickson, T. (2000). Lingua Francas for Design: Sacred Places and Pattern Languages. Paper presented at the DIS2000, New York, USA.
14. Fincher, S. (2000, Aug 7, 2007). The Pattern Gallery. Retrieved Jun 10, 2008, from http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/saf/patterns/gallery.html
15. Freeday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1).
16. Herring, S. C. (2004). Computer-mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Behavior. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning (pp. 338-376). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Ihde, D. (1993). Postphenomenology - Essays in the Postmodern Context. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Publishers.
18. Internet Forums. (2008). Retrieved Mar 18, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet-forum
19. Kassarjian, H. H. (1977). Content Analysis in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 8-18.
20. Kuniavsky, M. (2003). Observing the User Experience. London: Morgan Kaufmann.
21. Lerman, K., & Jones, L. A. (2007). Social Browsing on Flickr. Paper presented at the the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
22. Löwgren, J. (2002). The Use Qualities of Digital Designs.
23. Löwgren, J. (2006). Articulating the Use Qualities of Digital Designs. In P. Fishwick (Ed.), Aesthetic Design (pp. 383-403). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
24. Markham, A. N. (2004). The Internet as research Context. In C. Seale, J. Gubrium, G. Gobo & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative Research Practice. London: Sage.
25. Martin, D., Rodden, T., Rouncefield, M., Sommerville, I., & Viller, S. (2001). Finding Patterns in the Fieldwork. Paper presented at the ECSCW2001, Bonn, Germany.
26. Martin, D., & Sommerville, I. (2001). Patterns of Cooperative Design: Linking Ethnomethodology and Design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 11(1), 58-89.
27. McLure Wasko, M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57.
28. Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S., & Schwartz, H. (2000). It's Not What You Know, It's Who You Know: Work in the Information Age. First Monday, 5(5).
29. Powell, A., Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2004). Virtual Teams: A Review of Current Literature and Directions for Future Research. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 35(1), 6-36.
30. Romano, N. C., Donovan, C., Chen, H., & Nunamaker, J. (2003). A Methodology for Analyzing Web-Based Qualitative Data. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4).
31. Sharf, B. F. (1999). Beyond Netiquette: The Ethics of Doing Naturalistic Discourse Research on the Internet. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net. London: Sage.
32. Skågeby, J. (2007a). Analytical Dimensions of Online Gift-giving: 'other-oriented' contributions in virtual communities. International Journal of Web-based Communities, 3(1), 55-68.
33. Skågeby, J. (2007b). Designing Control of Computermediated Gifting in Multiple User Sharing Networks. In S. B. Heilesen & S. S. Jensen (Eds.), Designing for Networked Communications: Strategies and Development. Hershey, USA: Idea Group.
34. Skågeby, J. (2008). Semi-Public End-user Content Contributions: a case study of concerns and intentions in online photo-sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(4), 287-300.
35. Skågeby, J. (in press). Exploring Qualitative Sharing Practices of Social Metadata: Expanding the Attention Economy. The Information Society, 25(1).
36. Spinello, R. A. (1995). Ethical Aspects of Information Technology. London: Prentice-Hall.
37. Walstrom, M. K. (2004). "Seeing and Sensing" Online Interaction: An Interpretative Interactionist Approach to USENET Support Group Research. In M. D. Johns, S.-L. S. Chen & G. J. Hall (Eds.), Online Social Research: Methods, Issues, & Ethics (pp. 81-100). New York: Peter Lang.
38. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity: Cambridge University Press.
39. Zager, D. (2002). Collaboration as an Activity: Coordinating with Pseudo-Collective Objects. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11(1-2), 181-204.