Sequence Effects in the Categorization of Tones Varying in Frequency

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 416-430

  Stewart, Neil ^a   Brown, Gordon D A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEARING; HUMAN; LEARNING; LONG TERM MEMORY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RECALL; SOUND DETECTION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

HUMANS; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; MENTAL RECALL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; PROBABILITY LEARNING; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SERIAL LEARNING; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY;

EID: 1542357699     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.416     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Abeles, M., & Goldstein, M. H. (1970). Functional architecture in cat primary auditory cortex: Columnar organization and organization according to depth. Journal of Neurophysiology, 33, 172-187.
2. Ashby, F. G., & Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93, 154-179.
3. Baird, J. C. (1997). Sensation and judgment: Complementarity theory of psychophysics. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Baird, J. C., Green, D. M., & Luce, R. D. (1980). Variability and sequential effects in cross-modality matching of area and loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 277-289.
5. Berliner, J. E., & Durlach, N. I. (1973). Intensity perception. IV. Resolution in roving-level discrimination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 53, 1270-1287.
6. Berliner, J. E., Durlach, N. I., & Braida, L. D. (1977). Intensity perception: VII. Further data on roving-level discrimination and the resolution and bias edge effects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 1577-1585.
7. Braida, L. D., & Durlach, N. I. (1972). Intensity perception. II. Resolution in one-interval paradigms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 483-502.
8. Braida, L. D., Lim, J. S., Berliner, J. E., Durlach, N. I., Rabinowitz, W. M., & Purks, S. R. (1984). Intensity perception. XIII. Perceptual anchor model of context-coding. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 722-731.
9. DeCarlo, L. T. (1992). Intertrial interval and sequential effects in magnitude scaling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1080-1088.
10. DeCarlo, L. T. (1994). A dynamic theory of proportional judgment: Context and judgment of length, heaviness, and roughness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 372-381.
11. DeCarlo, L. T., & Cross, D. V. (1990). Sequential effects in magnitude scaling: Models and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 375-396.
12. Durlach, N. I., & Braida, L. D. (1969). Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 46, 372-383.
13. Garner, W. R. (1953). An informational analysis of absolute judgments of loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 373-380.
14. Garner, W. R. (1954). Context effects and the validity of loudness scales. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 218-224.
15. Gravetter, F., & Lockhead, G. R. (1973). Criterial range as a frame of reference for stimulus judgment. Psychological Review, 80, 203-216.
16. Haubensak, G. (1992a). The consistency model: A process model for absolute judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 303-309.
17. Haubensak, G. (1992b). Models for frequency effects in absolute judgment. In G. Borg & G. Neely (Eds.), Fechner day '92: Proceedings of the eighth annual meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics (pp. 93-97). Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University.
18. Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper & Row.
19. Holland, M. K., & Lockhead, G. R. (1968). Sequential effects in absolute judgments of loudness. Perception & Psychophysics, 3, 409-414.
20. Hu, G. (1997). Why is it difficult to learn absolute judgment tasks? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 323-335.
21. Jesteadt, W., Luce, R. D., & Green, D. M. (1977). Sequential effects of the judgments of loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 92-104.
22. Kiang, N. Y. S. (1975). Stimulus representation in the discharge pattern of auditory neurons. In E. L. Eagles (Ed.), The nervous system (Vol. 3, pp. 81-96). New York: Raven.
23. Lacouture, Y. (1997). Bow, range, and sequential effects in absolute identification: A response-time analysis, Psychological Research, 60, 121-133.
24. Lacouture, Y., & Marley, A. A. J. (1995). A mapping model of bow effects in absolute identification, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 383-395.
25. Laming, D. R. J. (1984). The relativity of "absolute" judgements. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 152-183.
26. Laming, D. R. J. (1997). The measurement of sensation. London: Oxford University Press.
27. Lockhead, G. R. (1984). Sequential predictors of choice in psychophysical tasks. In S. Kornblum & J. Requin (Eds.), Preparatory states and processes (pp. 27-47). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley.
29. Luce, R. D., Green, D. M., & Weber, D. L. (1976). Attention bands in absolute identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 20, 49-54.
30. Luce, R. D., Nosofsky, R. M., Green, D. M., & Smith, A. F. (1982). The bow and sequential effects in absolute identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 397-408.
31. Marley, A. A. J., & Cook, V. T. (1984). A fixed rehearsal capacity interpretation of limits on absolute identification performance. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 136-151.
32. Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207-238.
33. Mori, S. (1989). A limited-capacity response process in absolute identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 167-173.
34. Mori, S., & Ward, L. M. (1995). Pure feedback effects in absolute identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1065-1079.
35. Morris, R. B., & Rule, S. J. (1988). Sequential judgment effects in magnitude estimation. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 69-77.
36. Nosofsky, R. M. (1983). Shifts of attention in the identification and discrimination of intensity. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 103-112.
37. Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity and the identificationcategorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
38. Nosofsky, R. M., & Palmeri, T. J. (1997). An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 104, 266-300.
39. Petzold, P., & Haubensak, G. (2001). Higher order sequential effects in psychophysical judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 969-978.
40. Petzold, P., & Haubensak, G. (2003). Short-term and long-term frames of reference in category judgments: A multiple standards model. In S. Kaernbach, E. Schröger, & H. Müller (Eds.), Psychophysics beyond sensation: Laws and invariants of human cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Pollack, I. (1952). The information of elementary auditory displays. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24, 745-749
42. Pollack, I. (1953). The information of elementary auditory displays: II. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 765-769.
43. Purks, S. R., Callahan, D. J., Braida, L. D., & Durlach, N. I. (1980). Intensity perception. X. Effect of preceding stimulus on identification performance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 634-637.
44. Schifferstein, H. J. N., & Frijters, J. E. R. (1992). Contextual and sequential effects on judgments of sweetness intensity. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 243-255.
45. Shiffrin, R. M., & Nosofsky, R. M. (1994). Seven plus or minus two: A commentary on capacity limitations. Psychological Review, 101, 357-361.
46. Staddon, J. E. R., King, M., & Lockhead, G. R. (1980). On sequential effects in absolute judgment experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 290-301.
47. Stevens, S. S. (1957), On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 64, 153-181.
48. Stewart, N., & Brown, G. D. A. (2003). The relationship between similarity-based and difference-based models of perceptual categorization. Manuscript submitted for publication.
49. Stewart, N., Brown, G. D. A., & Chater, N. (2002). Sequence effects in categorization of simple perceptual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 3-11.
50. Takeuchi, A. H., & Hulse, S. H. (1993). Absolute pitch. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 345-361.
51. Treisman, M., & Williams, T. C. (1984). A theory of criterion setting with an application to sequential dependencies. Psychological Review, 91, 68-111.
52. Ward, L. M. (1972). Category judgments of loudness in the absence of an experimenter-induced identification function: Sequential effects and power-function fit, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94, 179-184.
53. Ward, L. M. (1973). Repeated magnitude estimated with a variable standard: Sequential effects and other properties. Perception & Psychophysics, 13, 193-200.
54. Ward, L. M. (1982). Mixed modality psychophysical scaling: Sequential dependencies and other properties. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 53-62.
55. Ward, L. M. (1985). Mixed-modality psychophysical scaling: Inter- and intramodal sequential dependencies as a function of lag. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 512-522.
56. Ward, L. M. (1987). Remembrance of sounds past: Memory and psychophysical scaling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 216-227.
57. Ward, L. M., & Lockhead, G. R. (1970). Sequential effect and memory in category judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 27-34.
58. Ward, L. M., & Lockhead, G. R. (1971). Response system processes in absolute judgment, Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 73-78.
59. Weber, D. L., Green, D. M., & Luce, R. D. (1977). Effect of practice and distribution of auditory signals on absolute identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 223-231.