Cross-Disciplinary Conversations: A Psychological Perspective on Justice Research with Non-human Animals

Social Justice Research

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 327-335

  Skitka, Linda J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Distributive justice; Equity; Inequity aversion

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866155906     PISSN: 08857466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11211-012-0161-z     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 67, 422-436.
2. Adams, J. S., & Jacobsen, P. R. (1964). Effects of wage inequities on work quality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 19-25.
3. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
4. Adams, J. S., & Freedman, S. (1976). Equity theory revisited: Comments and annotated bibliography. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 43-90). New York: Academic Press.
5. Adams, J. S., & Rosenbaum, W. B. (1962). The relationship of worker productivity to cognitive dissonance about wage inequities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 46, 161-164.
6. Austin, W., & Walster, E. (1974). Reactions to confirmations and disconfirmations of expectancies of equity and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 208-216.
7. Boldero, J., & Rosenthal, D. (1984). Equity, compromise, and competition: Effects of situational variables and type of allocation pool. The Journal of Social Psychology, 123, 207-221.
8. Bräuer, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Are apes inequity averse? New data on the token-exchange paradigm. American Journal of Primatology, 7, 175-181.
9. Bräuer, J., & Hanus, D. (2012). That's not fair-Inequity aversion in non-human primates. Social Justice Research. doi: 10. 1007/s11211-012-0159-6.
10. Brosnan, S. F. (2009). Responses to inequity in nonhuman primates. In P. W. Glimcher, C. Camerer, E. Fehr, & R. Poldrack (Eds.), Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain (pp. 285-302). London: Elsevier.
11. Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2003). Monkeys reject equal pay. Nature, 425, 297-299.
12. Brosnan, S. F., Newton-Fisher, N. E., & Vugt, M. V. (2009). A melding of the minds: When primatology meets personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 129-147.
13. Brosnan, S. F., Talbot, C., Ahlgren, M., Lambeth, S. P., & Schapiro, S. J. (2010). Mechanisms underlying the response to inequity in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Animal Behavior, 79, 1229-1237.
14. Callahan-Levy, C. M., & Messé, L. A. (1979). Sex differences in the allocation of pay. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 433-446.
15. Cropanzano, R., Goldman, B. M., & Benson, N. (2004). Organizational justice. In J. Barling, K. Kelloway, & M. R. Frone (Eds.), Handbook of work stress (pp. 63-88). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-149.
17. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social psychological perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.
18. Feather, N. T. (1994). Attitudes toward high achievers and reactions to their fall: Theory and research concerning tall poppies. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 1-73). San Diego: Academic Press.
19. Feather, N. T. (1999). Judgments of deservingness: Studies in the psychology of justice and achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 86-107.
20. Feather, N. T. (2008). Perceived legitimacy of a promotion decision in relation to deservingness, entitlement, and resentment in the context of affirmative action and performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1230-1254.
21. Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817.
22. Fiske, A. P. (1991). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations. New York: Free Press.
23. Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689-723.
24. Fiske, A. P., & Haslam, N. (2005). The four basic social bonds: Structures for coordinating interaction. In M. Baldwin (Ed.), Interpersonal cognition (pp. 267-298). New York: Guilford.
25. Fiske, A. P., & Tetlock, P. E. (1997). Taboo tradeoffs: Reactions to transactions that transgress spheres of exchange. Political Psychology, 17, 255-294.
26. Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of "voice" and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108-119.
27. Folger, R. (1984). Perceived injustice, referent cognitions, and the concept of comparison level. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 14, 88-108.
28. Folger, R. (1986). A referent cognitions theory of relative deprivation. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social comparison and relative deprivation: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 4, pp. 33-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Greenberg, J. (1982). Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 79-103). New York: Academic Press.
30. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399-432.
31. Greenberg, J. (2011). Organizational justice: The dynamics of fairness in the workplace. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
32. Hegtvedt, K. A. (2005). Doing justice to the group: Examining the roles of the group in justice research. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 25-45.
33. Homans, G. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 62, 597-606.
34. Homans, G. (1961). Social behaviour: Its elementary forms. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
35. Hopper, L. M., Lambeth, S. P., Schapiro, S. J., Bernacky, B. J., & Brosnan, S. F. (in review). The ontogeny of social comparisons in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Animal Cognition.
36. Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2010). Social justice: History, theory, and research. In S. T. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1122-1165). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
37. Lamm, J., & Schwinger, T. (1980). Norms concerning distributive justice: Are needs taken into consideration in allocation decisions? Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 425-429.
38. Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to it origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1-52.
39. Lerner, M. J., Miller, D. T., & Holmes, J. G. (1976). Deserving and the emergence of forms of justice. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 133-162). New York: Academic Press.
40. Leung, K., & Park, H. J. (1986). Effects of interactional goal on choice of allocation rules: A cross-national study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 111-120.
41. Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Fairness in social relationships. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, & R. C. Carsa (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
42. Leventhal, G. S., Michaels, J. W., & Sanford, C. (1972). Inequity and interpersonal conflict: Reward allocation and secrecy about reward as methods of preventing conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 88-102.
43. Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952-959.
44. MacCoun, R. J. (2005). Voice, control, and belonging: The double-edged sword of procedural fairness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1, 171-201.
45. Major, B., & Adams, J. B. (1983). Role of gender, interpersonal orientation, and self-presentation in distributive-justice behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 598-608.
46. Major, B., Bylsma, W. H., & Cozzarelli, C. (1989). Gender differences in distributive justice preferences: The impact of domain. Sex Roles, 21, 487-497.
47. Messé, L. A., & Callahan-Levy, C. M. (1979). Sex and message effects on reward allocation behavior. Academic Psychology Bulletin, 1, 129-133.
48. Messé, L. A., & Watts, B. (1980). Self-pay behavior: Sex differences in reliance on external cues and feelings of comfort. Academic Psychology Bulletin, 2, 82-88.
49. Mikula, G. (1974). Nationality, performance, and sex as determinants of reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 435-440.
50. Pierce, J., & Bekoff, M. (2012). Wild justice redux: What we know about social justice in animals and why it matters. Social Justice Research, 25, 122-139.
51. Price, S. A., & Brosnan, S. F. (2012). To each their own: Variability in responses to inequity in nonhuman primates. Social Justice Research. doi: 10. 1007/s11211-012-0153-z.
52. Pritchard, R. D., Dunnette, M. D., & Jorgenson, D. O. (1972). Effects of perceptions of equity and inequity on worker performance and satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 75-94.
53. Raihani, N. J., & McAuliffe, K. (2012). Does inequity aversion motivate punishment? Cleaner fish as a model system. Social Justice Research. doi: 10. 1007/s11211-012-0157-8.
54. Raihani, N. J., McAuliffe, K., Brosnan, S. F., & Bshary, R. (in press). Are cleaner fish (Labroides dimidiatus) inequity averse? Animal Behavior.
55. Range, F., Horn, L., Viranyi, Z., & Huber, L. (2008). The absence of reward induces inequity aversion in dogs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 340-345.
56. Range, F., Lietner, K., & Virányi, Z. (2012). The influence of the relationship and motivation on inequity aversion in dogs. Social Justice Research. doi: 10. 1007/s11211-012-0155-x.
57. Richards, J. C., Hof, A., & Alvarenga, M. (2000). Serum lipids and their relationships with hostility and angry affect and behaviors in men. Health Psychology, 19, 393-398.
58. Schwartz, S. (1975). The justice of need and the activation of humanitarian norms. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 111-136.
59. Schwinger, T. (1980). Just allocation of goods: Decisions among three principles. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction (pp. 95-125). New York: Springer Press.
60. Shafer, R. B., & Keith, P. M. (1980). Equity and depression among married couples. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 430-435.
61. Skitka, L. J., Winquist, J., & Hutchinson, S. (2003). Are outcome fairness and outcome favorability distinguishable psychological constructs? A meta-analytic review. Social Justice Research, 16, 309-341.
62. Skitka, L. J. & Wisneski, D. C. (in press). Justice theory and research: A social functionalist perspective. In H. Tennen & J. Suls (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology (2nd ed.).
63. Sprecher, S. (1986). The relation between inequity and emotions in close relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 309-321.
64. Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Star, S. A., & Williams, R. M., Jr. (1949). The American soldier: Adjustment during army life (Vol. 1). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
65. Thibaut, J., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
66. van den Bos, K. (2005). What is responsible for the fair process effect? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice: Fundamental questions about fairness in the workplace (pp. 273-300). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
67. Vermunt, R., & Steensma, H. (2003). Physiological relaxation: Stress reduction through fair treatment. Social Justice Research, 16, 135-149.
68. Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1976). New directions in equity research. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 1-43). New York: Academic Press.
69. Watts, B. L., Messé, L. A., & Vallacher, R. R. (1982). Toward an understanding of sex differences in pay allocation: Agency, communion, and reward distribution behavior. Sex Roles, 8, 1175-1187.