Mammography screening and trust: The case of interval breast cancer

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 75, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1746-1752

  Solbjør, Marit ^a   Skolbekken, John Arne ^a   Sætnan, Ann Rudinow ^a   Hagen, Anne Irene ^b   Forsmo, Siri ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Interval breast cancer; Mammography; Norway; Qualitative study; Screening; Trust

Indexed keywords

CANCER; MEDICINE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; TUMOR; WOMENS HEALTH;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INTERVAL BREAST CANCER; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; STATISTICS; TRUST;

AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TRUST;

NORWAY;

EID: 84866151055     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: 18735347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.07.029     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adelsward V., Sachs L. The meaning of 6.8: numeracy and normality in health information talks. Social Science & Medicine 1996, 43(8):1179-1187.
2. Autier P., Boniol M., La Vecchia C., Vatten L., Gavin A., Hery C., et al. Disparities in breast cancer mortality trends between 30 European countries: retrospective trend analysis of WHO mortality database. British Medical Journal 2010, 341:c3620.
3. Barker K.K., Galardi T.R. Dead by 50: lay expertise and breast cancer screening. Social Science & Medicine 2011, 72(8):1351-1358.
4. Broom D. Reading breast cancer: reflections on a dangerous intersection. Health 2001, 5(2):249-268.
5. Brown P. The phenomenology of trust: a Schutzian analysis of the social construction of knowledge by gynae-oncology patients. Health, Risk & Society 2009, 11(5):391-407.
6. Brownlie J. Conceptualizing trust and health. Researching trust and health 2008, 17-32. Routledge, New York. J. Brownlie, A. Greene, A. Howson (Eds.).
7. Brownlie J., Howson A. 'Leaps of faith' and MMR: an empirical study of trust. Sociology-the Journal of the British Sociological Association 2005, 39(2):221-239.
8. Calnan M., Rowe R. Researching trust relations in health care: conceptual and methodological challenges-introduction. Journal of Health Organization and Management 2006, 20(5):349-358.
9. Calnan M., Rowe R. Trust matters in health care 2008, Open University Press, Maidenhead.
10. Calnan M., Rowe R., Entwistle V. Trust relations in health care: an agenda for future research. Journal of Health Organization and Management 2006, 20(5):477-484.
11. Cancer Registry of Norway Cancer in Norway 2006-cancer incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence in Norway 2007, Oslo. F. Bray, B. Sæther (Eds.).
12. Cancer Registry of Norway Results from the mammography programme 2011, (Mammografiprogrammet - resultater), [28-2-2011 [cited 12-3-2012]; Available from URL. http://kreftregisteret.no/no/Forebyggende/Mammografiprogrammet/Resultater/.
13. Charles C., Redko C., Whelan T., Gafni A., Reyno L. Doing nothing is no choice: lay constructions of treatment decision-making among women with early-stage breast cancer. Sociology of Health & Illness 1998, 20(1):71-95.
14. Coffey A., Atkinson P. Making sense of qualitative data. Complementary research strategies 1996, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
15. Denberg T.D., Wong S., Beattie A. Women's misconceptions about cancer screening: implications for informed decision-making. Patient Education and Counseling 2005, 57(3):280-285.
16. Entwistle V.A., Quick O. Trust in the context of patient safety problems. Journal of Health Organization and Management 2006, 20(5):397-416.
17. Forss A., Tishelman C., Widmark C., Lundgren E.-L., Sachs L., Tornberg S. 'I got a letter...' a qualitative study of women's reasoning about attendance in a cervical cancer screening programme in urban Sweden. Psycho-oncology 2001, 10(1):76-87.
18. Giddens A. The consequences of modernity 1990, Polity, Cambridge.
19. Gifford S.M. The meaning of lumps: a case study of the ambiguities of risk. Anthropology and epidemiology 1986, 213-246. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht. C.R. Janes, R. Stall, S.M. Gifford (Eds.).
20. Gilson L. Trust and the development of health care as a social institution. Social Science & Medicine 2003, 56(7):1453-1468.
21. Greener I. Patient choice in the NHS: the view from economic sociology. Social Theory and Health 2003, 1(1):72-89.
22. Griffiths F., Bendelow G., Green E., Palmer J. Screening for breast cancer: medicalization, visualization and the embodied experience. Health (London) 2010, 14(6):653-668.
23. Gummersbach E., Piccoliori G., Zerbe C.O., Altiner A., Othman C., Rose C., et al. Are women getting relevant information about mammography screening for an informed consent: a critical appraisal of information brochures used for screening invitation in Germany, Italy, Spain and France. European Journal of Public Health 2010, 20(4):409-414.
24. Hall M.A., Dugan E., Zheng B.Y., Mishra A.K. Trust in physicians and medical institutions: what is it, can it be measured, and does it matter?. Milbank Quarterly 2001, 79(4):613-639.
25. Hofvind S., Geller B., Skaane P. Mammographic features and histopathological findings of interval breast cancers. Acta Radiologica 2008, 49(9):975-981.
26. Holland W.W., Stewart S., Masseria C. Screening in Europe 2006, World Health Organization, On behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.
27. Howson A. Cervical screening, compliance and moral obligation. Sociology of Health & Illness 1999, 21(4):401-425.
28. Jorgensen K.J., Gotzsche P.C. Content of invitations for publicly funded screening mammography. British Medical Journal 2006, 332(7540):538-541.
29. Jorgensen K.J., Zahl P.H., Gotzsche P.C. Breast cancer mortality in organised mammography screening in Denmark: comparative study. British Medical Journal 2010, 340:c1241.
30. Kalager M., Zelen M., Langmark F., Adami H.O. Effect of screening mammography on breast-cancer mortality in Norway. New England Journal of Medicine 2010, 363(13):1203-1210.
31. Katapodi M.C., Pierce P.F., Facione N.C. Distrust, predisposition to use health services and breast cancer screening: results from a multicultural community-based survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2010, 47(8):975-983.
32. Klawiter M. The biopolitics of breast cancer. Changing cultures of disease and activism 2008, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
33. Kvale S., Brinkmann S. Interviews. An introduction to qualitative research interviewing 2008, Sage, London.
34. Lewis J.D., Weigert A. Trust as a social reality. Social Forces 1985, 63(4):967-985.
35. Listhaug O. Oil wealth dissatisfaction and political trust in Norway: a resource curse?. West European Politics 2005, 28(4):834-851.
36. Liston J., Wilson R. Quality assurance guidelines for breast cancer screening radiology 2005, NHS Cancer Screening Programme, Sheffield. J. Liston, R. Wilson (Eds.).
37. Mechanic D., Meyer S. Concepts of trust among patients with serious illness. Social Science & Medicine 2000, 51(5):657-668.
38. Meyer S., Ward P., Coveney J., Rogers W. Trust in the health system: an analysis and extension of the social theories of Giddens and Luhmann. Health Sociology Review 2008, 17(2):177-186.
39. Möllering G. The nature of trust: from Georg Simmel to a theory of expectation, interpretation and suspension. Sociology-the Journal of the British Sociological Association 2001, 35(2):403-420.
40. Möllering G. Trust: Reason, routine, reflexivity 2006, Elsevier, Oxford.
41. Osterlie W., Solbjor M., Skolbekken J.A., Hofvind S., Saetnan A.R., Forsmo S. Challenges of informed choice in organised screening. Journal of Medical Ethics 2008, 34(9):e5.
42. Pfeffer N. Screening for breast cancer: candidacy and compliance. Social Science & Medicine 2004, 58(1):151-160.
43. Prinjha S., Evans J., McPherson A. Women's information needs about ductal carcinoma in situ before mammographic screening and after diagnosis: a qualitative study. Journal of Medical Screening 2006, 13(3):110-114.
44. Skolbekken J.-A. Communicating the risk reduction achieved by cholesterol reducing drugs. British Medical Journal 1998, 316:1956-1958.
45. Solbjør M. "You have to have trust in those pictures." A perspective on women's experiences of mammography screening. Researching trust and health 2008, Routledge, London. J. Brownlie, A. Greene, A. Howson (Eds.).
46. Solbjør M., Skolbekken J.A., Sætnan A.R., Forsmo S. Experiences of recall after mammography screening - a qualitative study. Health Care for Women International 2011, 32(11):1009-1027.
47. Stevenson F., Scambler G. The relationship between medicine and the public: the challenge of concordance. Health 2005, 9(1):5-21.
48. Tornberg S., Kemetli L., Ascunce N., Hofvind S., Anttila A., Seradour B., et al. A pooled analysis of interval cancer rates in six European countries. European Journal of Cancer Prevention 2010, 19(2):87-93.
49. Willis K. "I come because I am called": recruitment and participation in mammography screening in Uppsala, Sweden. Health Care for Women International 2008, 29(2):135-150.
50. Zackrisson S., Janzon L., Manjer J., Andersson I. Improved survival rate for women with interval breast cancer - results from the breast cancer screening programme in Malmo, Sweden 1976-1999. Journal of Medical Screening 2007, 14(3):138-143.
51. Zinn J.O. Heading into the unknown: everyday strategies for managing risk and uncertainty. Health Risk & Society 2008, 10(5):439-450.