The phenomenology of trust: A Schutzian analysis of the social construction of knowledge by gynae-oncology patients

Health, Risk and Society

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 391-407

  Brown, Patrick R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; Phenomenology; Risk; Risk communication; Risk perception; Schutz; Trust; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; COMMUNICATION SKILL; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HEALTH BELIEF; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PHENOMENOLOGY; TRUST; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

EID: 70350776822     PISSN: 13698575     EISSN: 14698331     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13698570903180455     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Allsop, J. and Jones, K., 2008. Withering the citizen, managing the consumer: Complaints in healthcare settings. Social policy and society, 7 (2), 233-243.
2. Berger, P. and Luckmann, T., 1966. The social construction of reality London: Penguin.
3. Brown, P., 2008. Trusting in the New NHS: Instrumental versus communicative action. Sociology of health and illness, 30 (3), 349-363.
4. Calnan, M., Rowe, R., and Entwisle, V., 2006. Trust relations in healthcare: An agenda for future research. Journal of health organisation and management, 20 (5), 477-484.
5. Calnan, M. and Sanford, E., 2004. Public trust in health care: The system or the doctor. Quality and safety in health care, 13, 92-97.
6. Coffey, A. and Atkinson, P., 1996. Making sense of qualitative data: complementary research strategies. London: Sage.
7. Coleman, J., 1983. Recontracting, trustworthiness and the stability of vote exchanges. Public choice, 40, 89-94.
8. Dasgupta, P., 1988. Trust as a commodity. In: D. Gambetta, ed. Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
9. Elliott, A., 2004. Subject to ourselves: Social theory, psychoanalysis and postmodernity. Boulder: Paradigm.
10. Ferday, J. and Muir-Cochrane, E., 2006. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International journal of qualitative methods 5 (1), 1-11. Available from: http://www.ualberta.ca/iiqm/ backissues/5_1/pdf/fereday.pdf [Accessed 31 July 2008].
11. Furedi, F., 1997. Culture of fear: Risk taking and the morality of low expectation. London: Cassell.
12. Giddens, A., 1990. The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
13. Goffman, E., 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City: Doubleday.
14. Habermas, J., 1970. Toward a theory of communicative competence. Inquiry, 13, 360-375.
15. Habermas, J., 1971. Toward a rational society: Student protest, science and politics. London: Heinemann.
16. Habermas, J., 1987. Theory of communicative action. Volume Two: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Cambridge: Polity Press.
17. Hall, M., et al., 2001. Trust in physicians and medical institutions: what is it, can it be measured, and does it matter? Milbank quarterly 79, 613-639.
18. Harrison, S. and Smith, C., 2004. Trust and moral motivation: Redundant resources in health and social care. Policy and politics, 32, 371-386.
19. Husserl, E., 1970. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern (first published 1954).
20. Johnson, D. and Grayson, K., 2005. Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships. Journal of business research, 58 (4), 500-507.
21. Kierkegaard, S., 1957. Concept of dread. Princeton: Princeton University Press (first published 1844).
22. Kierkegaard, S., 1985. Fear and trembling. London: Penguin (first published 1843).
23. Khodyakov, D., 2007. Trust as a process: A three-dimensional approach. Sociology, 41 (1), 115-132.
24. Lee-Treweek, G., 2002. Trust in complementary medicine: The case of cranial osteopathy. Sociological Review, 50 (1), 48-68.
25. Lewis, J. and Weigert, A., 1985. Trust as a social reality. Social forces, 63, 967-985.
26. Luhmann, N., 1979. Trust and power. Chichester: Wiley.
27. Möllering, G., 2001. The nature of trust: From Georg Simmel to a theory of expectation, interpretation and suspension. Sociology, 35, 403-420.
28. Möllering, G., 2007. Trust beyond risk: The leap of faith. Risk and rationalities conference, Cambridge, 29 March.
29. Neuman, W., 2000. Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
30. O'Neill, J., 1995. The poverty of post-modernity. London: Routledge.
31. Pavlov, I., 1927. Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Poortinga, W. and Pidgeon, N., 2003. Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk analysis, 23, 961-973.
33. Porter, E. and Lassiter, S., 2004. Markers of older widows' trust in non-professional homecare helpers. Care management journals, 5 (3), 145-150.
34. Putnam, R., 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
35. Rousseau, D., et al., 1998. Not so different after all: A cross discipline view of trust. Academy of management review, 23 (3), 393-404.
36. Russell, B., 1959. My philosophical development. London: Simon and Schuster.
37. Sartre, J.-P., 1962. A sketch for a theory of the emotions. London: Methuen (first published 1939).
38. Schutz, A., 1972. The phenomenology of the social world. London: Heinemann (first published 1932).
39. Seale, C. and Silverman, D., 1997. Ensuring rigour in qualitative research. European journal of public health, 7, 379-384.
40. Simmel, G., 1990. The philosophy of money. London: Routledge.
41. Sztompka, P., 1999. Trust: A sociological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Vaitkus, S., 1990. The crisis as a bankruptcy of trust: The fiduciary attitude, human nature and ethical science. International sociology 5 (3), 287-298.
43. Vaitkus, S., 1991. How is society possible: Intersubjectivity and the fiduciary attitude as problems of the social group in Mead, Guwitsch and Schutz. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
44. Wilkinson, I., 2001. Anxiety in a risk society. London: Routledge.
45. Williams, R., 2007. Tokens of trust. London: Canterbury Press Norwich.
46. Wynne, B., 1996. Misunderstood misunderstandings: Social identities and public uptake of science. In: A. Irwin and B. Wynne, eds. Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Zaner, R., 1991. The phenomenon of trust and the patient-physician relationship. In: E. Pellegrino, R. Veatch, and J. Langan, eds. Ethics, trust, and the professions: Philosophical and cultural aspects Washington: Georgetown University Press.