Including shared peptides for estimating protein abundances: A significant improvement for quantitative proteomics

Proteomics

Volumn 12, Issue 18, 2012, Pages 2797-2801

  Blein Nicolas, Mélisande ^a   Xu, Hao ^a,b   de Vienne, Dominique ^c   Giraud, Christophe ^b   Huet, Sylvie ^d   Zivy, Michel ^a  

^a INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^b CENTRE DE MATHÉMATIQUES APPLIQUÉES   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^d UR341 National Agronomical Research Institute (INRA)   (France)

Author keywords

Mass spectrometry; Protein quantification; Proteome; Shared peptides; Statistical modeling

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

MASS SPECTROMETRY; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PEPTIDES; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 84866148718     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201100660     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Domon, B., Aebersold, R., Options and considerations when selecting a quantitative proteomics strategy. Nat. Biotech. 2010, 28, 710-721.
2. Schulze, W. X., Usadel, B., Quantitation in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61, 491-516.
3. Podwojski, K., Eisenacher, M., Kohl, M., Turewicz, M. et al., Peek a peak: a glance at statistics for quantitative label-free proteomics. Expert Rev. Proteomics 2010, 7, 249-261.
4. Zhang, Y., Wen, Z., Washburn, M. P., Florens, L., Refinements to label free proteome quantitation: how to deal with peptides shared by multiple proteins. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 2272-2281.
5. Fermin, D., Basrur, V., Yocum, A. K., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Abacus: a computational tool for extracting and pre-processing spectral count data for label-free quantitative proteomic analysis. Proteomics 2011, 11, 1340-1345.
6. Bukhman, Y. V., Dharsee, M., Ewing, R., Chu, P. et al., Design and analysis of quantitative differential proteomics investigations using LC-MS technology. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 2008, 6, 107-123.
7. Jin, S., Daly, D. S., Springer, D. L., Miller, J. H., The effects of shared peptides on protein quantitation in label-free proteomics by LC/MS/MS. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 164-169.
8. Liu, Q., Tan, G., Levenkova, N., Li, T. et al., The proteome of the mouse photoreceptor sensory cilium complex. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2007, 6, 1299-1317.
9. Oberg, A. L., Mahoney, D. W., Eckel-Passow, J. E., Malone, C. J. et al., Statistical analysis of relative labeled mass spectrometry data from complex samples using ANOVA. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 225-233.
10. Plummer, M., JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling, Proceedings of DSC, Vienna, Austria, 2003.
11. Clough, T., Key, M., Ott, I., Ragg, S. et al., Protein quantification in label-free LC-MS experiments. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 5275-5284.
12. R Development Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2010.
13. Benjamini, Y., Hochberg, Y., Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 1995, 57, 289-300.
14. Paulovich, A. G., Billheimer, D., Ham, A.-J. L., Vega-Montoto, L. et al., Interlaboratory study characterizing a yeast performance standard for benchmarking LC-MS platform performance. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9, 242-254.
15. Valot, B., Langella, O., Nano, E., Zivy, M., MassChroQ: a versatile tool for mass spectrometry quantification. Proteomics 2011, 11, 3572-3577.